We Need YOUR Team Needs

One of the great things about the SBNation network is that we have 32, er 31 come on Chargers fans, experts from every NFL team easily at our disposal. Here is your chance to help out by commenting with what you feel are the team needs for your team.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Saints needs.
Secondary (specifically, corner), first. Offensive line depth second. Running back (just because they can't justify spending another high pick on one), third.
But really, they can upgrade at the best position available.
I liked the Keith Rivers pick from the other day's Mock Draft, because they need a monster on defense. I've also heard about Antoine Cason from Arizona, mostly from the great blogger at Canal Street Chronicles.
by Sunil on Dec 5, 2007 2:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'd give serious thought to....
...Cason in Round 1 and Frank Okam in round 2. If he's gone, Lawrence Jackson or Ali Highsmith would work as well.
I don't know the Saints well enough to know which specific defensive needs you need to fill other than secondary...but it seems to me the Saints' defense in general really needs a shot in the ass and you could do a lot worse than to draft defensive in the first two rounds.
This is just an ignorant Raider fan opinion, though, so don't take it too serious. :)
by Raybin on Dec 5, 2007 5:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
For the Bills
TE: Bills GM Marv Levy, in a recent interview, said that the team really needed a difference-maker at tight end. Someone to give the team a presence as a receiver from the position and in the middle of the field. Something the Bills have lacked since the days of Pete Metzelaars.
WR: When Peerless Price went down, the Bills were forced to use Josh Reed as the #2 wideout. It hasn't worked so well. Reed needs to play in the slot, and the Bills need a red zone threat in a bad way. Any receiver whose skills complement Lee Evans' would do; we need a variety of skills at the skill positions to fully help the development of Trent Edwards.
LB: Keith Ellison's production hasn't been great, and the Bills were hammered by injury at the position. Angelo Crowell and Paul Posluszny are fine as starters going forward, but the team really needs a quick athlete with good-to-great blitz presence to really complete this trio.
DE: Buffalo won't spend a high pick on an end, but a situational pass rusher (perhaps in the mold of Chicago's Mark Anderson) would be a welcome addition to a Cover-2 defense that can't get consistent pressure on the QB up front.
OL: The Bills seem content with their starting lineup, but depth is a huge concern. This holds true for all line positions.
DT: Buffalo is one good DT short of having a very nice 4-man rotation. They may only add one DL, so they might target a big athlete who can play inside and out (Calais Campbell comes to mind).
CB: Terrence McGee is entrenched long-term as a starter. However, Jason Webster isn't (and he's injury-prone); Ashton Youboty has not developed as quickly as we'd have liked; and Jabari Greer probably shouldn't be a full-time starter. We need a big athlete that can tackle with good ball skills; we're not overly concerned with top-notch speed, as we have plenty of that at the position.
QB: It appears that Trent Edwards is the future of the position; we'll need to add a backup if J.P. Losman forces his way out of Buffalo during the off-season. I doubt this comes through the draft, as a veteran backup to the youngster Edwards makes a lot more sense.
Honored, Mr. Miller, that you'd value my opinions on the Bills. Hope this helps.
by Brian Galliford on Dec 5, 2007 2:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Great stuff, Brian. I agree that tight end is a huge need for this team. I'd love to see them grab Martin Rucker (Missouri).
by MattMiller on Dec 5, 2007 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re:
As would I, sir. He'd bring some versatility and a red zone offense that desperately needs both.
by Brian Galliford on Dec 5, 2007 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bills
I was a big fan of Edwards at Stanford, despite his low productivity and injuries. He was just a good all-around talent and leader. I think you guys have a good quarterback there. And Marshawn Lynch is phenomenal. It will be exciting to see that young team, on both sides of the ball, gel.
by MattMiller on Dec 5, 2007 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dolphins Needs
There are a ton of them, so rather than rank them, I like to put their needs into classes from 1 to 3, with 1 being the highest priorities and 3 the lowest.
The 1s
-Defensive line, interior and ends
-Cornerback
-Offensive tackle
-Tight end
The 2s
-Offensive guard
-Safeties
The 3s
-Inside linebacker (as I'm not sold on Crowder as a replacement for Zach when his time comes)
-Wide receiver
by Matty I on Dec 5, 2007 3:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
none
It might have been easier to list the things they DON'T need, Matty. Good work. Thanks!
by MattMiller on Dec 5, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Chiefs needs
First and foremost, the offensive line. Besides veteran Brian Waters, the Chiefs could conceivably replace everyone else on the offensive line. Chris Terry and Kyle Turley have no ability left to guard the right side. Off-season acquisition LT Damion McIntosh has proved to be incapable of blocking by himself. You could make a case for keeping center Casey Wiegmann but he's 34 years old.
The next area of concern is the secondary and specifically the corner backs. Patrick Surtain's play has dropped off significantly this year. Ty Law is just getting too old, despite the occasional INT. We don't really have anyone in the cupboard for CB either.
Like a lot of teams, the Chiefs don't have a true fullback. I'm not saying we're out there looking but it would be nice to compliment Larry Johnson. FB Tony Richardson left in 2006 and the Chiefs never replaced him.
Finally, the Chiefs need another receiver to compliment Dwayne Bowe. The guys behind Bowe will never evolve into more than no. 3 type WRs.
Hope this helps!
by Chris Thorman on Dec 5, 2007 3:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Raiders
DL: Just look at the opposing team's rushing numbers. These guys are a sieve and get pushed back way too easily.
WR: They're going to need to get some better weapons for whenever Jamarcus Russell takes over full-time. Ron Curry and Jerry Porter are adequate complimentary receivers, and Johnnie Lee Higgins has some potential as a slot guy, but none of them are really suited to be the lead playmaker. There is some young talent at TE and RB, but they need to get some WRs before the passing game ever takes off.
OT: Barry Sims and Cornell Green have to be one of, if not the, worst starting tandems in the entire league. Sims has had a nice career but is no longer suited to play LT, Cornell Green just isn't very good, and rookie Mario Henderson has yet to show any signs that he'll cut it. A big must for protecting their big investment.
by AndrewC on Dec 5, 2007 4:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Beat me to this!
I was gonna do my beloved Raiders! :) Instead, I'll just offer further comments:
I think you have the priorities right. Much as leaks in WR and the O-Line need plugged, that defensive line is letting in water through a big hole and the whole ship is sinking.
Since we'll certainly end up in the top 6 or 7, I don't see how we can pass up Sedrick Ellis. He can make an immediate impact, and having Warren Sapp mentor him for a year or two would be gravy.
The second round gets trickier. There are definite needs at tackle and receiver...but which do you take?
WR's like Adarius Bowman, Keenan Burton and Marcus Henry could all concevieably be available at that point. I say Bowman first choice and Henry second.
However, given the fact that guys like Jeff Otah and Sam Baker will likely still be on the board....can you pass either one of those up to replace Barry Sims? God knows I hope (and think) Kiffin will show him the door in the offseason. Cornell Green is a non-entity at this point and I'm positive he'll be lauched as soon as the season is done.
At this point, though, I'm leaning toward Adarius Bowman. Paul McQuistan has been shockingly effective in relief of Green and if he keeps playing well, I say give him a shot to start next year. Then, you bring in Henderson and see what he can do.
However, if McQuistan's play declines, I could very easily see shifting my ground to supporing Jeff Otah as the second round pick.
Just my two cents and as always....your mileage may vary.
by Raybin on Dec 5, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good suggestions
I don't see a receiver who's really worth a high first round pick, at least where the Raiders are picking. Really depends how godawful the teams are that pick ahead of us (there are a lot of terrible teams this year). I can see them picking up WR Malcolm Kelly if they move back a few spots, or even if they are in the 5-7 range and he works out real well and Al Davis falls in love with him (which he tends to do).
Sedrick Ellis is awesome, I'm a Bruin fan but I saw him play for a couple of years at SC, and he just tears everyone up. He's not in the best shape, but he's got a great first step and would be a perfect replacement for Sapp. I would not be mad if they picked him. Chris Long, if he's there, would be a good pick too.
I'm not really big on Bowman, he's big but kinda stiff, but the other guys are good picks. Curry is already a bigger, physical possession guy so I'd like to see a guy with a bit more speed. I think Baker will probably be around in the 2nd round when they pick and I think he'd be a good fit. He's a bit overrated but fits in perfectly with the zone blocking.
It's a very important draft to fill some big needs and I hope they draft smartly.
by AndrewC on Dec 5, 2007 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Colts
If they brought back every starter they had this season and just drafted some depth everywhere, I'd feel great.
I think the 1st priority is whatever the lose in free agency. Bob Sanders and Dallas Clark are in the last year of their deals and both starting Guards are playing for the one year contract they got as restricted FAs last season. None of the other unrestricted FAs are starters (using this site http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/featu...
So, replace what is lost to free agency and pick up some depth, hopefully at , HB, WR, OL, DE and DB.
by shake n bake on Dec 5, 2007 5:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Chargers needs
Since there is no Charger SB Nation blog, I thought I'd step in.
I say they should trade all draft picks to Oakland as an effective apology for what LT has done to the team these past years! Then again, I'm biased.
by Raybin on Dec 5, 2007 5:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What's sad...
Is that Oakland would go on to draft 7 players that would be out of the league in the next 3 years. Thank you, Al Davis.
by MattMiller on Dec 5, 2007 5:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're being generous
Half of those players would have been cut by the end of training camp. Stop being silly.
by AndrewC on Dec 5, 2007 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Giants team needs
The Giants are having a surprisingly good season, but still have several need areas.
- Cornerback -- especially a big, physical cover guy to pair with Aaron Ross.
- Wide Receiver -- Amani toomer is aging and Sinorice Moss is a bust.
- Offensive Line Depth
- A run stuffing DT
- A placekicker
by ETVal on Dec 5, 2007 8:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Edwards at Stanford
Other than Cardinal fans, I'm surprised anyone actually saw Edwards play at Stanford. When he could actually stay on the field, Edwars is a decent game manager. His numbers weren't stupendous however, even when healthy. While Trent has shown he can limit mistakes and keep the Bills in games, he has yet to prove, at Stanford or Buffalo, that he can beat a team with his arm. Note, for all the hoopla around Edwards in Buffalo, he still has thrown a total of 1 TD and 5 INT's as a pro.
by CalGuru on Dec 5, 2007 11:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Packers Needs
When your team is cruising along at 10-2 there aren't a lot of needs, however, there are three positions that come to mind. First is help at safety where Atari Bigby has struggled and a rookie could battle it out with Aaron Rouse for the starting job. Second is linebacker where Brady Poppinga isn't a star and they could use a linebacker that is good in pass coverage. Third is at cornerback where Al Harris and Charles Woodson are good, but both are over 30 and it would be a good place to plan for the future. None of these are needs that have to be addressed in the first round, and given GM Ted Thompson's love of trading down I would expect him to trade out of the first round and grab more picks later in the draft. Plus he's already traded away his 2008 6th round pick for RB Ryan Grant (which is looking like a pretty sweet trade but...) so he would probably want to, at the least, replace that lost pick. He's never traded current picks for future picks, so trading a 2008 first round pick for a 2009 first round pick would be unlikely.
by Brandon on Dec 6, 2007 1:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rams needs
...because I know everyone's dying to read more about the Rams!
First and foremost, the Rams need an OT. Not just any old OT, a blue chipper ready to step in and make a difference right away, a la Joe Thomas. So, if someone could tell the other teams at the bottom end of the food chain to keep away from Michigan's Jake Long, we'd really appreciate it. Alex Barron, once thought to be O. Pace's understudy just won't cut it, and the Pacer's getting older by the second.
Obviously, there are other needs whose order can be debated. A preliminary ranking might look like:
- OT
- speedy DE
- WR
- burly fullback
by VanRam on Dec 6, 2007 10:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Eagles Needs
Return threat - For several years now the Eagles have lacked anything resembling a real threat in either kick or punt returns. The only time they've been able to create any excitement on a return is if they put Brian Westbrook back there, but it's not really feasible to have your starting RB who is already leading the league in touches back returning every punt. Two years ago they picked Jeremy Bloom hoping he would be the solution and obviously wasn't. Going into the draft I honestly think this should be the top priority.
Defensive back - I say just "defensive back" because the Eagles have multiple needs back there. The eventual replacement for Brian Dawkins needs to be here soon and generally the Eagles lack depth at safety. They went into the year with 3 safeties on the roster and all three have ended up missing games this year and Sean Considine, who started at SS, ending up on IR. Also, the Eagles are in dire need of a solid nickel corner. I think the starters are pretty solid, but guys like Will James and Joselio Hanson have just not got the job done. The Eagles play nickel so much that the third corner is almost like another starter. Plus, the fact that starter and 2 time pro bowler Lito Sheppard seems to get hurt every year is becoming more and more of a concern. Frankly, I was downright shocked when the Eagles didn't pick any DBs on the first day last year.
Defensive End - This is a position I'd prefer to fill in free agency, but it could be considered a draft need as well. Basically the Eagles are just going to need numbers at the position. In all likelihood the high priced and under performing veterans like Darren Howard and Jevon Kearse will be cut. So the Eagles will be left with just 3 DEs. It is more than just numbers though, Trent Cole has done a good job bringing pressure from one side but has rarely had any consistent pressure from the other. They are in sore need of a real pass rusher from the other side
by JasonB on Dec 8, 2007 11:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Minnesota's Needs
Well, Matt, here are the Vikings' needs as I see them:
- Safety - Darren Sharper isn't going to be around forever, and we need to seriously start looking for a replacement at the safety spot for him, particularly with 2008 being the last year of his contract. If we're picking in the late teens/early 20s like I'm hoping we are, I would love to hear Roger Goodell call the name of Kenny Phillips with our first round pick.
- Wide receiver - I loves me some Sidney Rice, let me tell you. Bobby Wade is a serviceable #3/slot type of receiver, and Aundrae Allison has some decent potential, too. But we need one more big-time threat on the outside. Troy Williamson, all the effort he's put forth be damned, simply hasn't been very good, and we can't cut Robert Ferguson fast enough for my liking. So, this is probably our next biggest need. Round 2 sounds like potential Mario Manningham/James Hardy/Lavelle Hawkins territory to me, and any of those guys would be very welcome in Minnesota.
- Quarterback - A month or so ago, this would have been an easy #1. But Tarvaris Jackson really looks like he's finally starting to "get it" out there, so this pick isn't so much for competition for the starting spot. . .it's to give us a reason to get rid of Brooks Bollinger and/or Kelly Holcomb, who both suck out loud. With two third round picks (thank you, Denver), the Vikings could stand to use one of them on a quarterback. . .maybe an Erik Ainge, or maybe even stealing Dennis Dixon should he fall that far.
- Corner - Antoine Winfield's getting up in years, too, and might actually benefit from a move to safety. I like the potential of Griffin and McCauley, but we could always use one more guy for depth at that position. Heck, couldn't everybody? But with the other third round pick, the Vikings could look for a Charles Godfrey/Jonathan Zenon type of player to fill the nickle/dime role in the defensive backfield.
Outside of that. . .MAYBE defensive tackle is a need (potential Pat Williams replacement), MAYBE a kicker (since Ryan Longwell is getting a little older), and MAYBE a defensive end.
The positions the Vikings are pretty well set at are running back, linebacker, tight end, O-line (maybe a T for depth would be a good idea), and punter.
I think that should just about do it. (-:
by GonzoDN on Dec 8, 2007 3:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Denver Broncos
We are hurting on defense, but aging elsewhere, so we have to weigh a lot of considerations.
We have 8 picks currently:
1st
2nd
(2)4th
(2)5th
(2)7th
The debate rages over at MHR about those first two picks, with everyone getting realitively settled down by the fourth round. I feel qualified to throw up two of the opinions that are getting discussed a lot.
The first argument (my own, for now) is to take LB with both picks. We need a starter bad, and taking a chance and not suceeding actually sets us back by about two years, as the only real starter we have right now is D.J. Williams and he is out of position. I would like to see us take an OLB and a MLB, and I think we could muster enough leverage to move up in the second round to help out. This gives us a better chance at securing a future starter, and if we got 2 starters we might even be able to move D.J. back to weakside where he excels.
The other argument says if a great safety drops to you in the first round take him, and then take a LB second, and if need be, insure the LB with a later round pick. I am so close to buying this argument and dropping my own. I have been following Green Bay's adoption of the Bates defensive scheme, and they pursued the safety position hard until they hit on the right combination. They also didn't turn around their defense until they got the safety position nailed and stopped giving up the big play. On the other hand, I keep thinking that if we could just put off safety for one more year, to put the finger in the dike as it were, that we could approach the 09 draft ready to get our future safeties. (We only really are looking at one, whereas we need two LBs).
The rest of the draft is getting a decent consensus, and involves depth at OL (we tend to pick these guys up sucessfully in the later rounds), a DT project (the good ones are just to expensive for us this year, and at least 8 decent stopgaps, and one perfect fit, Corey Williams in GB, will be on the market in FA), and then WR.
My own opinion is to take a WR in the fourth, and I would like to see a bigger, more physical style of player, given Denver's offensive style. To this end I created an amateurish diary that is up at MHR, and which I will put up here in hopes of garnering some input and hearing about the guys I'm forgetting, or shouldn't have included.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 8, 2007 9:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
More on the Cowboys
I posted this on blogging the boys already.
It's astonishing how consistently hole-less the Cowboys are in their current form. There really isn't any position of glaring need.
Tackles: Flo, Free, McQ, Marten, Colombo. Check.
Guards: Davis, Kosier. We could use a nice Left guard, but It's not a priority.
Center: Gurode. We just signed the dude to an extension and he's a stud blocker. (Snapper? That's another issue)
RB: The barbarian is incredible. There are a great number of backs who could supplement his greatness with 7-8 carries a game even if JJ leaves.
WR: TO will be god until the day he dies. Crayton is solid. Stanback, Hurd, and Austin are all young and talented.
TE: Witten, Fasano, and Curtis. Probably the best tightend core in the league.
DT: Tank, Rat, and Ferg. Unspectacular but solid, with two guys in their 20s.
DE: Canty, Spears, Bowen, Hatcher. One stud, the rest are servicable.
OLB: Ware, Ellis, Spencer, and Rogers+Carpenter as filler. These positions are set for quite a while.
MLB: James, Ayodele, Burnett. 3 workmanlike guys who won't lose you any games.
CB: Newman and Henry are both solid. Reeves is average, Jones mediocre. The position's older than one would like, but there's not a lack of talent.
FS: Hamlin's good, Watkins a decent backup.
SS: Roy is Roy. I can't stand him, but he's here to stay. Keith Davis is uncuttable because of his ST prowess and general awesomeness.
So, to sum it all up... this team has no obvious areas of need. If we're drafting, It'd be
A: For depth.
B: for Immediate impact.
C: For huge upside.
No more guys like Carpenter, who project as mediocre athletes in a scheme not suited for them.
Example: Under the same mindset, two drafts ago we would have drafted Antonio Cromartie ahead of aforementioned Ohio linebacker.
If there's nobody there with a pick that we see as fitting any of the three criteria, we'll probably trade down.
by Or Moyal on Dec 9, 2007 9:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Steelers' needs
Primary areas of need:
OL - Hopefully they take an OT in the first and a center in the 2nd.
DL - This is mostly for depth and guys to groom as starters in the future, considering the age of the starting DL right now.
Power RB - It's no secret that Fast Willie Parker isn't much of a power back and it wouldn't be a bad idea to pick up a guy with some power late in the draft.
Tall WR - The tallest wide out is third string Nate Washington at 6-1. Not much there to throw a fade route to.
by cgolden on Dec 10, 2007 8:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Detroit Lions. . . have the faith
Round 1 - Desperate need for a solid Cover 2 Cornerback. If the caliber of player is there with this pick--Antoine Cason, Reggie Smith, Malcolm Jenkins, Aqib Talib- it is worth spending the first round money on, especially if he can help in the return game.
Round 2 - Deep draft at the OT spot, possibly look for Sam Baker, Alex Boone, John Greco or Barry Richardson. Cannot pay for first-round talent here because of the huge salary Backus has, but moving him to RT and drafting a young stud may solve everything...
Round 3 - If Millen fails to fill the gaping hole at MLB in Marinelli's Tampa 2 in any off season acquisition (Vilma, Brooking) then an early draft choice is necessary. Maybe packaging some late picks to move back into the second round could drastically help, with Phillip Wheeler, Ali Highsmith, Erin Henderson, and wildcard Jeremy Dizon all looming in this area.
Round 4 - May have forfeited this pick to find a LB, but if not a RB/SPT man to add athleticism or TE here to fill a need. No one really knows how healthy KJ is and Brian Calhoun will attempt to return from an ACL injury, so I like Justin Forsett, James Davis, Ryan Torain or possibly Gary Barnidge. Love Eddie Royal too, but naah.
Round 5 - Still early enough to find raw athleticism and a body in a DE. With Kalimba Edwards likely on the way out (finally just inactivated against Dallas), a spot behind last year's rookie project Alama-Francis could be filled nicely with a fifth rounder. Hopefully Hilee Taylor or Darrell Robertson slide down just a bit.
Round 6 - If it weren't for Drew Stanton still basically being a rookie, a shot at QB in this deep position could be worth it...especially if Dennis Dixon is there. But with the three QBs on the depth chart likely to remain the same, a shot at another CB makes sense. Depth here can only improve with some senior talent, the likes of Marcus Walker, Jonathan Zenon, or Terrell Vinson. Jasper Brinkley is sexy too at MLB if he drops.
Round 7 - At least this year it isn't Mr. Irrelevant. Find another big body to try his efforts at OT. Who knows, maybe this guy turns out to be better than the second rounder. It is Matt Millen after all! - Matt Flynn is a fucking winner too; he could be worth it if nothing else is there.
Like the site fellas, just caught my eye a couple days ago. Can't wait for the draft after this past Sunday.
by nhillclemson on Dec 11, 2007 3:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Chicago Needs
Where to do we start? We need upgrades to QB and the Offensive Line, but I hope we address that in free agency not the draft.
Aside from that in the draft we need to look at safety and running back.
Depending on what Bernard Berrian does we may also need to look at receiver.
by Adam T on Dec 11, 2007 10:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Texans' Needs
The Texans could draft nothing but DB and OL for the next two (2) years and I'd be thrilled. That said, I look for them to address the following positions via the draft:
- LT
- CB
- FS
- SS
- RB
- C
Keep up the great work here, Matt. Can't wait until we tee it off in the SB Nation Mock Draft again.
by Tim on Dec 11, 2007 2:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bengals Needs
We need owner.
Thanks.
OK, seriously.
Contracts are solid on offense, though we have Willie Anderson close to retiring and a desperate need for a good center and a guard. Though one of our existing guards is a natural tackle so moving him out there could free up that spot and force the need for a guard. Either way, we need at least two quality offensive linemen.
On offense, I'd say center and right tackle will be good starting points.
On defense... where do I start?
At end, we have 10.5 sack in 2006 Robert Geathers that accidently became a weak-side outside linebacker. Justin Smith won't get paid his $8.5 million franchise contract again and negotiations are pretty far apart. We have Bryan Robinson (contract up), John Thornton and Michael Myers at defensive tackle. All three are long in the tooth.
So I'd say a defense end and tackle on the line.
Linebacker. Man. First, we have to figure out if Odell Thurman will (a) be back and (b) be in football shape. If he is on both, there's no doubt he plays and starts. Then we have to see what David Pollack's status is whether or not he'll play again. If so, we'll have to figure out if they'll move him back to end -- where he should have been anyway.
Then we have contracts up for Dhani Jones, Rashad Jeanty (RFA), Landon Johnson and Caleb Miller (the last two are unrestricted).
Secondary. We're close to being set in the secondary with three rookies at corner and safety. We have Madieu Williams whose contract is up and Dexter Jackson who's getting older.
So, in summation -- what you're looking for, I'd say.
- LB
- G/C
- DT
- DE
- RB (depends on Rudi Johnson and Chris Perry... both could be gone next season).
- TE (Reggie Kelly long in the tooth with no apparent apprentice)
Hope that does it.
by Kirkendall on Dec 11, 2007 5:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















