SB Nation Writers Mock Draft: Round 2, Pick #49
![]() |
![]() No. 49 |
CHICAGO |
WCG from at Windy City Gridiron had had arguably the best draft thus far, and he hasn't even made a pick.
The Bears have to descend off their franchise quarterback cloud for a moment to make another pick. We know that with the next two rounds we have three needs to address. Offensive Line, Wide Receiver and Safety. When the draft hit the #25 pick in the first round, we were feeling pretty good. Darrius Heyward-Bey was still on the board, so there was a good chance that we could see Kenny Britt or Brian Roberskie fall to us, but there was a run on receiver and we were left with the next available receiver which was Juaquin Iglesias or the next lineman which was Phil Loadholt. We wanted Loadholt, but he also went just before our pick.
So the choice now is draft Iglesias or the a guy like Eric Wood. I've never been that high on Iglesias, so I wasn't comfortable drafting him. Instead we opted for Eric Wood, C, Louisville. The deciding factor was by drafting Iglesias we would have been adding depth to a not-so good group of receivers. We already have depth there. We need starters. Or we can take Wood and get depth to our now surprisingly solid offensive line. And when some of our older guys slow down or retire in the next so many years, Wood would be ready to slide in and take over. We are projecting Wood more as a guard than a center, but him being able to play two positions is just a bonus.
MTD thoughts: This is actually a pretty tough spot to be picking in for Chicago. Wood is a little bit of a reach, but the team has no other great needs. Taking the best player available wouldn't help in this instance, either.
Mocking the Draft's Top Five Remaining Prospects - QB Josh Freeman, CB Alphonso Smith, RB Shonn Greene, TE Chase Coffman, S Patrick Chung
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
I've got to say I struggled with this pick
I had to call a conference of my cobloggers. We were really hoping Loadholt or Britt might be around. Iglesias and Wood are both reaches, but there really weren’t many other decent options. I did take a look at Patrick Chung.
In the end I just went with the best place I thought I could add depth and pick up a potential starter down the road.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Apr 14, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Eric Wood is going to be a great player at the next level. His gamefilm, Senior Bowl film, and Combine workout all were top notch. I think Eric Wood is right up there with Alex Mack as the best interior lineman in this draft.
RIP Sean Taylor (1983-2007)
by RedskinFEVA on Apr 14, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know it doesn't mean much,
but Mel Kiper’s latest mock has Eric Wood going to Pitt with the last pick of the first round (before either Mack or Unger). So it’s not that big of a reach.
by LantermanC on Apr 14, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the draft falls like is has here, I’d really expect the Bears to try and trade down. Maybe grab an extra pick to help makeup a little bit for the Cutler deal.
by Mocking Dan on Apr 14, 2009 12:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Definitley an option
but I’d prefer to see them move up. If we are going to do this, do it right. We have Cutler, now go get him some guys to throw to at all costs. If that is Holt or Harrison, so be it. Otherwise make sure you get him one in the 2nd.
Wait until the first is over and see how many receivers are left. Target the one you like and go get him. Moving up 5-6 spots in the 2nd won’t be too costly.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Apr 14, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not thrilled
As a Bears fan, I’m not thrilled with this pick. (But to be fair, I’m also not at the point where I’m suggesting we pick up torches & pitchforks and burn your house down.) Seems to me that with only one pick in the first three rounds (well…unless you consider our 3rd round comp. pick a “real” third rounder, which I don’t—more of a high 4th rounder), and with as many needs as we have on the team, I have a hard time with a luxury pick of a guy who we know isn’t even going to be a starter. Kreutz is getting old but is still very much a starting-caliber C. While I agree the Bears are going to need a center for the future, I just can’t see taking one at this point when we have positions that we need for the present that are currently unfilled.
If I were in your shoes, (or rather, in the Bears’ shoes) at this spot in the draft with the picks the way they have gone down to this point, I would have taken the best safety on our board. Likely that would be Patrick Chung from Oregon, or perhaps it would be Rashad Johnson (Alabama) or Louis Delmas (W. Mich). Any of the three (IMO) are worthy of a mid-2nd round pick.
The only thing I really agree with you about is that there is no need to “reach” here for a WR. We might get lucky and snag a guy with a lot of potential deeper in the draft, or perhaps we can sign a veteran between now and the beginning of the season. I think it’s a lot harder finding quality safeties on the FA market than it is finding quality (or at least passable) WR’s.
by JohnPaul on Apr 14, 2009 4:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I see where you are coming from
but none of the guys you mention are going to be starters either. At CB they have Tillman, Vasher, Graham and McBride at safety they have Payne, Steltz, Bullocks and Glen Earl and there are rumblings they still might bring back Mike Brown.
There is not position they can draft that would equal a game one starter.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Apr 14, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmm...
Last year the Bears were 30th in the league in pass defense. Indications right now look like that’s going to get worse, not better, if we stick with the players we currently have.
The only player in that entire list of safeties that seem to have any potential to me is Kevin Payne. As for the others? I’ve seen nothing from Steltz that leads me to believe he is a starting-caliber safety in the NFL. And please don’t tell me Bullocks is going to be the starter… the Saints had the worst pass defense in the entire NFL last year, and he was so bad he got BENCHED by them! (Why? Because he couldn’t cover anybody…)
If we were to draft Chung, I could definitely see him starting at SS and Payne moving over and starting at FS. (Payne is a real ballhawk; if he had 4 picks last year from the SS position I’d love to see what he could do at the FS position). Or you could keep Payne at SS and draft either Delmas or Johnson; either of those I am quite sure would easily beat out Steltz or Bullocks to be the starter at FS. Because right now I think we have nothing at that position. (Perhaps I’m wrong…I hope I’m wrong… but that’s how I see it.)
by JohnPaul on Apr 15, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I won't aruge on some of this
Bullocks in my opinion is horrible, but the Bears picked him up. You may have not seen anything from Steltz, but last year was his rookie year and he didn’t play a lot in many of the first games. A lot of people were very high on him last year. if you are going to draft somebody you can’t get rid of them the next year, you have to give them the opportunity.
I did say that I looked at Chung, just that the best way I could help my team immediately is to take another linemen. My line has a lot of age and a lot of youth. They are an injury away from crumbling. If we can get enough decent depth on the line it improves both aspects of our offense and most importantly it keeps Cutler from taking too many shots.
If this draft went another round, I can assure you I would have kept an eye on a guy like Chris Clemons out of Clemson. I’m not ignoring the fact that we need help at safety, just that I thought this was the best way to go on this draft pick.
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by Adam T on Apr 15, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
While we may still disagree, you argue your side well. If nothing else, it ought to be interesting to see what the Bears do come draft day. Whichever direction they go, they can’t afford to strike out. Go Bears!
by JohnPaul on Apr 15, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FS
Is much more of a need, but this pick would certainly make a lot of sense since Kreutz is getting long in the tooth. Wood may be able to beat out Garza during training camp, and suddenly the Bears biggest weakness before FA (O-line) is huge strength.
"I'm not so mean. I wouldn't ever go out to hurt anybody deliberately - unless it was, you know, important, like a league game or something." - Dick Butkus
by propheteer on Apr 15, 2009 6:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















