Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Should the Chiefs Use 5th Overall Pick in the 2010 NFL Draft on a Left Tackle? - ANALYSIS SAYS NO!

 

It is a fact that Branden Albert had a difficult year at LT for the Chiefs in 2009.  He allowed twice as many sacks as he did in his rookie year of 2008 (9 vs. 4.5) and was the worst LT in his peer group of “franchise left tackles”.

We also know about the “extenuating circumstances” he had to deal with in 2009:

-Had to adjust to a new playing weight (lost 30 pounds during the offseason at Todd Haley’s request)

-Lost his offensive coordinator two weeks before the start of the season

-Had to learn an entirely new playbook for the second year in a row

-Blocked next to an aging and declining LG in Brian Waters (and with a C, RG and RT who would be backups, not starters for most NFL teams)

-Had a new quarterback (Matt Cassel) who was less mobile and held the ball longer than the one who started for most of the 2008 season (Tyler Thigpen)

-Directly felt the loss as the protector of the “blind side” of the “safety valve” in the Chiefs passing game, Tony Gonzalez, who always seemed open in 2008 for a short pass when the opponent’s d-line was closing in on Thiggy

-Suffered for the 1st half of the season, as the entire offense did, with a feature running back (LJ aka Valdemort) who averaged 3.3 yds a carry.  Defenses waited for the inevitable 3rd and long (after a failed run and a dropped pass) and then sent everyone

-Had to master a new zone blocking scheme

 

But here’s what you may not know:

 

1.      Branden Albert allowed ZERO SACKS in the last 6 games of the 2009 season including shutouts of NFL sack leader Elvis Dumervil (TWICE) and Aaron Schobel (tied for 11th in sacks in 2009)

2.      Every “franchise left tackle” in the NFL allowed more sacks in 2009 than he did in 2008 except for Jason Peters and Duane Brown (both of whom had HORRIBLE years in 2008 with 11.5 sacks allowed each).  The avg last yr is around 6-6.5 sacks

3.      The only “Class of 2008” left tackle chosen after Albert in 2008 to outperform him by more than 2 sacks allowed was Sam Baker (3 sacks less)

4.      Branden Albert allowed the same amount of sacks in 2009 as the “no show Pro Bowl substitute himself”, Bryant McKinnie, who protected “the ancient one” for Minnesota.  Don’t forget that McKinnie has the perennial All-Pro Hutchinson at LG

5.      The two first round tackles chosen in 2009 who played in 2009 (Jason Smith was injured) allowed only slightly less sacks than Branden.  Oher allowed 8 at RIGHT TACKLE, a much easier position for pass protection

 

Check out my chart below.  I believe in "Don" Pioli and he will make the right decision.  I will be VERY SURPRISED if the Chiefs take a left tackle with the 5th pick in the draft.

I believe that it's much smarter to draft Maurkice Pouncey in the 2nd round and let Brian Waters and Pouncey compete for the Left Guard position next year with the loser sliding over to Center.  Rudy Wisenheimer becomes the Right Guard, O’Callahan is the Right Tackle (having learned the system, had a full training camp and pre-season with the team, etc.), Leonard Pope actually blocks at TE (instead of the human sieve, Sean Ryan who had allowed 5 sacks in the early season games we started him in.  In spite of the two touchdowns he scored, we couldn’t afford to keep him in the lineup - 5 sacks/2 TDs = 2.5 sacks per TD ratio!  Any doubt why he was invisible for the last 10-12 games?) and we have the makings of a competitive NFL offensive line.  Hope for development at Guard from Colin Brown, grab another interior lineman in the 3rd – 5th rounds (a strength of Pioli’s) and the Chiefs offensive line will be just fine.

 

You often read in mock drafts that the Chiefs pick a Left Tackle at #5 to “improve 2 positions with one pick – Left Tackle and whatever position Branden moves to”.  What about improving 3 positions by drafting Pouncey?  LG, C, RG (assuming Rudy’s better at RG)

 

I pray Eric Berry is available at #5 and beseech Pioli and Haley to take him if he is.  The last time the Chiefs had an “erry” at safety (Deron Cherry), we had a pretty awesome defense.  Eric Berry makes Flowers even better.  He makes Brandon Carr much better.  He even makes our mediocre inside linebackers better.  The NFL is going through a pass-happy, big play phase.  TEN, that’s right TEN quarterbacks (almost 1/3 of the league!) passed for 4,000 yards last year.  Four of the ten, Romo, Roethlisberger, Rivers and Eli Manning, shredded the Chiefs. We need Eric Berry in the worst way whether Page comes back healthy or not.

 

If Berry is gone at #5, I think Scott will try desperately to trade down and failing that, grit his teeth and reach for either Rolando McClain or Dan Williams (actually prefer Mt Cody in the 2nd over Williams in the 1st – even if we trade down).

 

Lord, hear my prayer.  BB wants EB at #5.

 

 

BBEAR'S CHART OF SACKS ALLOWED IN 2009 BY “FRANCHISE LEFT TACKLES”

 

Best performance in 2009 = 2.5 sacks by Light/Vollmer NE and Johnson/Ugoh IND

 * = PRO BOWL 2009

CLASS OF 2008                    2009 SACKS                                 2008 SACKS          DRAFT POSITION

Jake Long MIA*                          5.0 sacks                                       2.5 sacks                   before Albert

Sam Baker ATL                          6.0 sacks                                     did not start                after Albert

Ryan Clady DEN*                       6.5 sacks                                      0.5 sacks                  before Albert                    

Duane Brown HOU                     7.5 sacks                                     11.5 sacks                 after Albert

Chris Williams CHI                      8.0 sacks                                      did not start               before Albert

Branden Albert KC                   9.0 sacks (0 in last 6 games)     4.5 sacks                                                      

Jeff Otah CAR                            NO STATS FOUND/INJURED      did not start                after Albert

 

VETERAN LEFT TACKLES

Michael Roos TEN                           5.0 sacks                             1.0 sack

Marcus McNeill SD                          5.0 sacks                             3.0 sacks

Joe Thomas CLE*                           6.0 sacks                             4.5 sacks

Jason Peters PHI*                           6.0 sacks                            11.5 sacks

D’Brickashaw Ferguson NYJ*         8.0 sacks                             4.0 sacks

Bryant McKinnie MIN*                     9.0 sacks                             4.0 sacks

 

CLASS OF 2009

Jason Smith STL                              INJURED

Eugene Monroe JAX                        7.0 sacks

Michael Oher BAL                            8.0 sacks at RIGHT TACKLE

 




If it's deemed spam, it gets deleted.

Comment 40 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

dude, this is an excellent analysis!

I had no idea that all those LTs allowed more sacks in 09 than 08, wonder why…. and all the circumstances that may have lead to Alberts sophmore slump seem valid.

only ONE problems, the only way Berry makes it past TB is if a DT is still there, that only happens if ST L goes with QB instead of Suh.

So who is your plan B (not LT) if Berry not there ? (assuming no trade down) you dont want Williams at NT at #5 (understandable) , so….McClain? maybe Dez Bryant? would you concider QB if one or both avail?

by durst on Feb 25, 2010 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

Durst

My plan B (as unsatisfying as it may be) is described in the post above.

If Berry is gone at #5, I think Scott will try desperately to trade down and failing that, grit his teeth and reach for either Rolando McClain or Dan Williams (actually prefer Mt Cody in the 2nd over Williams in the 1st – even if we trade down).

by bbear200 on Feb 25, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

But Andre the Large is not playing LT. He is the second highest Guard ever selected.

Leonard Davis was taken with the #2 pick. I don’t know if they thought he might play Left Tackle, but I believe most of his career has been at Guard. Robert Gallery is the same story, although he was picked to play Left Tackle not Guard.

by NorthLeft12 on Feb 25, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

L Davis was drafted to be a tackle

Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "[my most important sabermetric stats are] runs scored and runs driven in"

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 25, 2010 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Good work bbear!

There is some kind of reflex that kicks in when a “Draft Guru” sees a team that allows a bunch of sacks [say over 40] that you replace the Left Tackle with a rookie and move the old LT to another position. VOILA! Problem solved.

Just a note about Matt Cassel’s mobility. He is actually a decently mobile QB. His problem is his indecisiveness. The New England Sacks Allowed totals for the last three years:

2007 – 21
2008 – 48
2009 – 18

Brady was the QB in 2007 and 2009. Cassel was the QB in 2008. The O line was virtually unchanged except for Sebastian Vollmer [a rookie, a good one but a rookie anyways] playing ten games at LT and RT.

Please don’t tell me that Brady is more mobile than Cassel.

by NorthLeft12 on Feb 25, 2010 10:51 AM EST reply actions  

Yep

You’re right, Cassel just holds the ball too long and that is what causes some of his sacks.

by JASiege on Feb 25, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

NorthLeft

Couldn’t agree more. Cassel holds the ball longer than Brady. Cassel is less mobile and holds the ball longer than Thigpen. Sacks can be misleading depending on QB.

Ryan Clady went from 0.5 sacks to 6.5 sacks from 2008 to 2009. He didn’t get 12X worse.

Denver changed QBs from Cutler to Orton. Look what happened to Denver sacks overall:

Denver sacks in 2008 = 12
Denver sacks in 2009 = 34

Orton holds the ball longer than Cutler.

My bottom line is that Albert is a franchise LT and we need to fill other gaping holes in this year’s draft

by bbear200 on Feb 25, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, I agree with your logic. We are having the same argument here in Detroit about Jeff Backus.

Except your guy is younger and had a good rookie year and a great second half. Not sure why people are so anxious to dump him and get the “next best thing”.

As you and other Chiefs fans have pointed out, you have numerous weaknesses that need fixing, why use a high draft pick on something that is not a big need? Its not as if you will be reaching far down your board for another player if you pass on Okung. I see you guys being able to take Eric Berry if you want. If not him Joe Haden or Rolando McClain or Dez Bryant.

by NorthLeft12 on Feb 25, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow

Scientific research has proven that you lose exactly 5.37 billion brain cells every time you listen to Todd McShay.

by TheRealSlimShady on Feb 25, 2010 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

You think Backus is a Franchise Tackle?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Feb 28, 2010 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Why are you sneak dissing? Why dont you just say what you want and not be shy?

I would waant to replace Albert just as bad if he wasn’t A) only in his second year and B) He gave up 10 sacks a year for 4 straight. He is nothing like Backus and to comepare them is ridiculous. A matter of fact, I wouldnt mind the Chiefs drafting Okung but Berry will be there before O Kung will. Okung will go in the top 4 just because of posistion value. Show me how many times in the last 10 years a LT didnt get picks in the top 5.

by darwithabar on Feb 25, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Backus did not give up ten sacks this year. He allowed eight.

He also did not accumulate twelve major penalties like Albert. Backus had three. Their sack rates [lower is better] were 1.34% for Albert and 1.27% for Backus. And Backus is a better run blocker than Albert, but I digress.

I was trying to compare the discussion, not the players. If you want to misread it that way dwb, be my guest. I guess you want to use the “replace the LT” argument for Detroit, but not for KC when the exact same logic is being used in both cases.

by NorthLeft12 on Feb 26, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Albert is a pretty damn good run blocker

but, yeah, I tend to agree that neither Detroit nor KC will draft an OT in the first.

I think Washington will, though

* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
* keep Albert at LT, upgrade the positions that NEED upgrading.C, RG, NT, S, LB

by stagdsp on Feb 26, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting

So if the Chiefs draft Eric Berry, Jerry Hughes, and John Jerry, that will be an ’erry good draft.

by medicineball on Feb 25, 2010 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

lol

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 25, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope the Chiefs draft Berry

As a Chargers fan I just laugh at the way they are building the team. Apparently no one has told Pioli or Chiefs fans that LT, QB, pass rusher, and corner are the most important positions.

Its pretty simple if you cant protect the passer (QB and LT), and rush the passer (edge rusher and CB) your squad will always be garbage even if you have 2 Eric Berrys and three Tyson Jacksons.

So keep pushing to draft a safety at 5 overall Chief fans, so I can laugh at you when they dont or laugh at your front office when they do.

by AirNorval on Feb 25, 2010 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

Keep pushing to draft one of the best players in the draft is bad?

No, instead we could draft Weddle, Cromartie, Cason, maybe Larry English. Also, We have all three of those posistions you speak of filled. Hali, Albert, and Cassel. Should we draft a QB at five? No. I wouldnt mind seeing a LT get picked but I wouldnt want that if Berry was on the board.

by darwithabar on Feb 25, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope you guys pick Berry

The funniest would be if you picked a bust NT. That way you could have paid 150mil for the entire bust that is the Dline.

by AirNorval on Feb 25, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Same for you except your secondary is actually full of busts

Dorsey was 4th in tackles among all 3-4 DEs dude. Atleast know what you’re talking about. Tyson Jackson was a rookie. Ill take both of Alphonso Boone. Considering Dorsey has over 100 tackles in his first two seasons, that must make him a bust huh? Along with Kevin Williams, Richard Seymour, and Warren Sapp huh? Get Real, Hopefully your horrible SB nation blog and horrible team gets a SB.

by darwithabar on Feb 25, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Chargers secondary a bust haha

Thats about as funny as you trying to make me care about a ring the Chiefs more than 10 years before I was even born.

by AirNorval on Feb 25, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

My Jags don’t even have a trophy case

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Feb 28, 2010 8:41 AM EST up reply actions  

When

Its the best player in the draft, I don’t see how it could be a bad thing. I agree with you that other things need to be taken care of but don’t insult us. We have the QB and LT in Cassel and Albert, pass rusher in Hali and a top 10 corner in Flowers. You think you’re on some special high horse because you’re a Charger fan, I remember when your team was terrible…Ryan Leaf anybody. Why don’t you come back when you guys have actually got the Lombardi trophy, instead of choking every time you’re in the playoffs. Sure our team hasn’t won a SB in a while but your team hasn’t won one ever.

by Green-Monster on Feb 27, 2010 5:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Great work bbear. I really like the analysis.

Do you really find Haden to be to much of a reach to help your secondary? Is a safety that much better? Maybe it feels like holding your nose to take the top WR, or the top ILB, or the top RB, or even QB. To those of us that can not hope to get the top of any position we think your crying over spilled beer when your mug as already been refilled.

Nice Post

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 25, 2010 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

spilt beer

i understand the sentiment, but the high pick also carries high risk in cap room if he’s a bust and/or not as useful as he could be.

Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "[my most important sabermetric stats are] runs scored and runs driven in"

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 25, 2010 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he'll go to KC

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
Driver of the "Cut Reggie Nelson" Bandwagon.
Winner of the 2010 Chad Pennington Award

by TheTealDeal on Feb 25, 2010 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks +1000 for this post

LT is NOT the top priority, and as soon as I see a mock with Okung at #5, I begin to dismiss it. (At least if the mocker acknowledges that they’re not really sure about the pick, I’ll give them some slack.)
They’ll take the biggest upgrade they can find, which is DT, LB, S depending on talent available for the pick.

Zapp Brannigan/Dayton Moore quote of the day: "[my most important sabermetric stats are] runs scored and runs driven in"

by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 25, 2010 10:03 PM EST reply actions  

Are you really pretended like you know what Scott Pioli will do?

You shouldnt dismiss mocks if you havent made one. That is a rule on MTD and probably the biggest one. You dont know what Pioli will do. Okung impressed today and Pioli said he would focus on O line.

by darwithabar on Feb 25, 2010 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

to be fair

Pioli said OL would be A focus, but not THE focus…

which many interpreted as him saying they wouldn’t be looking for a LT in the first…

I actually believe it is VERY likely that Pioli will NOT take a LT at #5… based on his history, and the team needs, etc.

* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
* keep Albert at LT, upgrade the positions that NEED upgrading.C, RG, NT, S, LB

by stagdsp on Feb 26, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

He did say

TE was a need though talent-wise and Depth…

Jermaine Gresham with 2A anyone?

by Green-Monster on Feb 27, 2010 5:13 AM EST up reply actions  

well, i hope not

I am thinking a Colin Peek later rounds would be fine

Not a big enough need for pick 2a…that pick may be Cody, Tate or Pouncey

* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
* keep Albert at LT, upgrade the positions that NEED upgrading.C, RG, NT, S, LB

by stagdsp on Feb 27, 2010 8:16 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

well, then... he jumped 20 in and ran a 5.64...

so, you could consider it a “wash” ?

* KC now has the best coaching staff in the league
* Pioli will make at least one trade in the offseason, and 2 trades during the draft
* I'd prefer "lightning and lightning" as opposed to "lightning and thunder" when it comes to RBs
* 9-7 is a real possibility in 2010 IF the Chiefs get 4 new starters
* keep Albert at LT, upgrade the positions that NEED upgrading.C, RG, NT, S, LB

by stagdsp on Mar 2, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Cody's Combine

Not sure that Vince Wilfork could even complete a 40 yard dash, but I lust for him all the same.

I think Cody doesn’t get past San Diego in the 1st round.

by bbear200 on Mar 2, 2010 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Mocking the Draft provides detailed information, scouting reports, mock drafts and rumors surrounding the NFL Draft

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Clash_small
Welcome to the Offseason Mock Draft
Small
Is RG3 the second best QB prospect since Peyton Manning?
Small
2012 NFL Draft Updated (1st-7th Rounds/ Trades)
Small
Giants Draft History and Future

Recent FanPosts

Small
Your Mocks Are All Wrong, Pats Will Use One and Only One 1st Rounder
Small
Updated 2012 NFL Mock Draft
994_small
2012 Mock Draft w/Trades
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
Post-Superbowl Mock Draft.
Dsc_0636_small
Colts Mock
Small
Rock out with your mock draft out: Evan Silva (RotoWorld.com)
La_la_land_small
First Round Mock
Small
*v0.4* Just another muck.. err Mock!
Small
Here's a new mock

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

OVERALL RANKINGS


Director of Scouting and Head Writer

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mockingthedraft_small Dan Kadar

Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

Burnie_small Matthew Fairburn

Writers

Mtdlogo_small Josh_D

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Small seton hall and steelers

Small KashMoney

Small pick256

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Damond_y_maga_small Damond Talbot