2010 SB Nation Mock NFL Draft: Pick 60
The second round of the 2010 SB Nation NFL Mock Draft winds down. We're having each SB Nation blogger make selections for their respective teams. John Morgan, lead blogger at SB Nation's Seattle Seahawks blog, Field Gulls, checks in to make the No. 60 overall selection in this year's mock. Take it away!
With the No. 60 overall pick in the 2010 SB Nation NFL Mock Draft, the Seattle Seahawks have selected Taylor Price, WR, Ohio
John says: From the second Seattle hired John Schneider I believed the Seahawks would draft Taylor Price. I can retroactively explain why, but there was no why when it happened. I knew a little about Price and I knew a little about Schneider and there was this intuitive coupling. Schneider’s record in Green Bay is pretty opaque. I don’t have much to draw from, but, shoot, let’s pursue this.
I think Price is possibly the best wide receiver prospect in the 2010 class. He has excellent tools. He is a good if sometimes methodical route runner. Price’s performance has been hidden by an inept Ohio passing attack. That is not uncommon. Neither Eddie Royal nor Steve Breaston ever surpassed Price’s anemic-seeming 784 yards receiving as a senior, but then none of their teams surpassed 3,000 yards of passing offense the season before they were drafted. Surrounding talent and diverse schemes make it almost impossible to properly translate college stats.
Price has speed, agility, size, power and tantalizing route running skills to build off. Seattle has a good possession receiver in T.J. Houshmandzadeh, a very good young tight end in John Carlson, Deion Branch, Deon Butler and some auxiliary hands out of the backfield, but it has nothing resembling a number one receiver. Its offense has shriveled. It needs maximum upside picks that maybe fail but could turn into something special. Price could be as good or better than any other receiver in this class.
Mocking Dan reacts: This is somewhat unexpected. But given that John went with Taylor Mays with the sixth pick, my surprise was tempered. I'm not quite as high on Price as John is, but his reasoning is sound. If another direction is taken, there are some solid guards out there – Mitch Petrus is a perfect scheme fit – and Lamarr Houston could be another good, young piece for the defensive line.
Mocking the Draft's Top 5 remaining prospects: 1 - Rob Gronkowski/TE/Arizona, 2 - Brandon Spikes/LB/Florida, 3 - Aaron Hernandez, TE, Florida, 4 - Toby Gerhart/RB/Stanford, 5 - Brandon LaFell/WR/LSU
Sound off, SB Nation! What say you of Seattle's selection of Price? Please be sure to check out Field Gulls for all of your Seahawks needs.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pretty good pick in my opinion, Maybe a little early, i think he will be there later. But i watched this guy a couple games his senior year and the kid can ball. Very good receiver. But i think he mightve been there later in the 3rd or maybe 4th being a somewhat unknown in the draft.
by gatorempire127 on Apr 14, 2010 10:26 AM EDT reply actions
'Hawks don't have a third-round pick, though.
I’d have been tempted by Lamarr Houston, but now that Seattle’s officially not getting B-Marsh this would be a good pick.
If you are looking at need, the 'Hawks desperately need a DE.
There are a few around [Alex Carrington, Austen Lane – yeah I know, a little early] who are worth a shot here.
That might not be true
Whatever you think of him, the Seahawks have USC alum Lawrence Jackson at standard DE; they very well could move Aaron Curry to Stand Up DE in the version of 4-3 defense that Pete Carroll runs. Any standard 4-3 DE drafted this year would be as a back-up to Jackson, and the Seahawks have made it clear most (if not all) draftees will be starters next season.
I’m not saying they won’t draft a DE, but they are hardly desperate to do so.
Good pick.
I love white man hustle. And sure, we need OLine help, but Alex Gibbs.
by DJ C-Raig on Apr 14, 2010 3:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Would prefer to get Houston at 60 and see what receivers fal to the 4th round
But John makes an excellent argument in taking Price.

by 




















