Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Interact: What is the worst team in the NFL?

I hate doing mock drafts this time of year because no one is ever happy with the team order. Instead of talking about the players and why they were put where, people just complain about where their favorite team picked.

So I leave it up to you, the wonderful and intelligent MTD commentors to figure out the worst team. Have at it in the comments. Try not to be too much of a homer and come strong with your opinion.

To clue you in on my thinking on the matter, I think the worst team in the league is among the following: Buffalo, Carolina, Cleveland, Detroit, Jacksonville, St. Louis and Tampa Bay. No, I will not explain why your team is in that list. That's not the point here, so get over it.

Take into account not only talent but also schedules and team needs.

Poll
What is the worst team in the NFL?
Buffalo Bills
195 votes
Carolina Panthers
10 votes
Cleveland Browns
70 votes
Detroit Lions
27 votes
Jacksonville Jaguars
13 votes
St. Louis Rams
154 votes
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
28 votes

497 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 503 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dallas

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 4:24 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Bad

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 15, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

A good case could be made for St. Louis

I can’t see them making a Dolphins like turnaround this season and I can’t see any more then 3-4 wins.

All the teams you got there, Detroit, Tampa and Carolina should get better if they get more consistent QB play. Jacksonville I can see going 7-9 again, but not the worst in the NFL.

I’d say its between Buffalo and St. Louis. If the Cardinals are gonna start Leinart or Derek Anderson at QB, they’re a dark horse to suck too, given that and the loss of 2 vets from their back 7.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Good.

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 15, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

see…an objective fan with an objective analysis can’t really say cleveland is the worst, yet we got more votes than the Lions or Bucs…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

the Bills and Rams have over double the Browns votes.

But they still got a chance to be that bad. Jake Delhomme was so bad the Panthers, a solid club even as banged up as they were, sucked. What’s he gonna do on the Browns if he starts?

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 16, 2010 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

well…he could have a better season…its not unheard of that a turnaround like that happens.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 20, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Lions have skill position players.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

every team does

if they didn’t, that’d be illegal.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 16, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know exactly what I’m talking about, no need to be a smartass

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

there's always a need fo that.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 17, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

they have 2 skill position players that are good really. There are very few players on the Lions I would objectively put on the browns.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 20, 2010 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would take Stafford over Delhomme, Johnson and Burleson are much better than Massoquoi and Robiskie, and the RBs are close and I could make an argument for eather group

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Burleson is that much better than MoMass at this point…I still like our RBs better b/c I have never been a big fan of Best and I don’t think Kevin Smith is that good…

but yes, stafford over delhomme (just for upside though I think delhomme might have a higher QB rating this year), Johnson over MoMass (maybe not burleson…I don’t think burleson is that much better and i go for upside. I take both our RBs over theirs. maybe only take 2-3 players on D (Delmas, Suh) and maybe only Cherlius on the O-Line.

So in total, maybe 5-7 total players…(maybe also pettigrew)

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think Pettigrew will be better than Watson.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree, but pettigrew will probably be better in the long run…that is why i said maybe also pettigrew, but now I am feeling most likely i would take him.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

It Has To Be St. Louis...

Except for the difficulty of repeating as the league’s worst. My sleeper pick for the top pick next year: Seattle.

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 15, 2010 4:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I keep thinking its St. Louis but then I think about Buffalo and all the reasons I have for St. Louis I have for Buffalo.

No Offensive line: check
Lack of receiver talent: check (I’m not a fan of Lee Evans)
No defensive line: check
Question at quarterback: check
General lack of talent at every position on the team: check

I don’t think I could really give a reason why St. Louis should be worse than Buffalo and vice versa. The only thing I can think of is Buffalo plays in a much stronger division. Oh, and a darkhorse pick for worst team is Seattle. Hasselbeck is on his last legs and the answer of the future appears to be Charlie Whitehurst.

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Jun 15, 2010 4:36 PM EDT reply actions  

No defensive line: check

Marcus Stoud, Dwan Edwards, and Kyle Williams are far from “no defensive line”.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jun 15, 2010 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Aren't you guys moving to a base 3-4?

If so then I have to agree at this point, with no d-line, until there is a chance to see them play.

The 5th Dimension
#29 Eric Berry

by BAMFSpecialOps on Jun 15, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK. Unproven DL.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jun 15, 2010 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

if our freaking line

could stay healthy, it wouldnt be that bad. Jason Brown at center is the only solid player who hasn’t been injured. Jason Smith should be fine if he avoids injury also.

Keith Null won't accept my friend requests.

by loyal2therams on Jun 23, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice point about the schedule

The NFC west plays the AFC west and the NFC south. That’s a good portion of the schedule playing piss poor competion. Seattle x2, AZ x2, Raiders, Cheifs, Bucs Panthers, Was, Det, Denver is basically the who’s who of suck (how Denver didn’t make that poll is a little surprising). The Bills are in the AFC East, play the AFC North and the NFC north. They have winnable games vs Jax, KC, Det and Cle, maybe they can pull something off against the Bears. If the competition is close, then a good day vs a bad one could be the difference. St. Louis can get away with lucky bounce games a lot more the Bills.

by einman77 on Jun 16, 2010 3:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Broncos, Huh?

We had a little fun here last year: the guys who thought the Broncos would suck lost gentlemen’s bets against me. How badly do you think they’ll do (W-L record, si vous plait)?

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 16, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great Minds...

I agree with that assesment, but einman77’s surprise that Denver wasn’t included in a poll for the worst record in pro football would indicate that he’s thinking of four or fewer…

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 16, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possibly

I think the philosophy changed to a defensive minded team, but then lost the D-coordinator. And a good one too. The team went from an 8 and 8 team that started well and tanked to… an 8 and 8 team that started well and tanked. I also think the draft won’t pan out this year. It’s all future stock, if that. And the bottom feeders in that division are getting stronger. Of course, I contradict myself with the schedule bit, because Denver has kind of a light one as well. Last season they could stand losing Cutler. This year, without Marshall and Clady for a long time, that offense could really hit a wall. Things could go really wrong this season for them. I just don’t see them being better than the Panthers in any kind of way, thus the reason I am curious about the list. Would I want to put that to a “gentleman’s bet”? What the heck do I care about that?

I wouldn’t vote for the Broncos being the worst, but they could be a darkhorse candidate if the stuff hits the fan.

by einman77 on Jun 16, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes on Clady

No on Marshall. When Denver was hot, as you mentioned, Marshall the “#1” WR was the leading receiver 2x in 6 games, with a 67 yarder vs OAK and a 91 yarder vs. Dallas. I truly think this could help Denver as in the losing streak my main beef with Orton was he relied on Marshall too much, and didnt utilize quality depth at the position, until the last game where he spread it around to everyone, (including Derrick Johnson) and got a 400 yd + performance.

Do I think we hav a top 10 O on our hands? No, but I dont think it will be to the point where we are THE worst team in the league. To be /the worst team, u have to have no talent whatsoever, and that is most definitly not the case.

And hearing of how good Bay bay is at route running in only his first week, I think his impact will be bigger and sooner than you think

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 16, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marshall>Bay Bay
Clady> just about every LT in the league

I wouldn’t call you worst in the league at this point, but things could really come off the rails without your anchor on the line and your best option to bail you out.

by einman77 on Jun 17, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didnt say Bay Bay is better than BMarsh

I do think though that BMarsh will be missed as much as Cutler was missed, NOT AT ALL. Fans from other teams just dont realize how detrimental to our team this guy was. Even with shanny he was just a punk who was terrible for the locker room.

And again, we heard that same thing last year when we traded Cutler, but we still prevailed. This isnt the NBA ala not a league of superstars. We will do fine, again just like last year, although I would feel safer making that prediction with Clady but last I heard he should be good for the home opener, JAX, which would ease him in due to their lack of pass rush

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

And back to Bmarsh

if he has surgery every offseason, he wont last long. He runs hard which looks awesome on tape but its going to catch up to him sooner than many might think. That and he usually hurts himself in one dumb way or another, so I am interested to see how long BMarsh will be dominant in this league

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think you guys got the better end of that deal

I think Marshall will be gone soon, whether injury or suspension. He could just keep on T.O.ing himself out of the league too. But you invested in the future, while we are talking about this season. You keep on glossing over Clady, and not acknowledging how important or serious it is is just blind optimism. He’s your left tackle. He’s as important as they come on offense. If you don’t have that, you better have a great plan B. You don’t. That’s why this could be a rough year.

by einman77 on Jun 17, 2010 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didnt gloss over Clady

“We will do fine, again just like last year, although I would feel safer making that prediction with Clady but last I heard he should be good for the home opener, JAX, which would ease him in due to their lack of pass rush”

Thats what I said, and your link proves me further, in ur link: "Since it was only a partial tear, some are estimating that Clady might be out for only 3-4 months, which would put him in line to miss the preseason and possibly play in the season opener against the Jacksonville Jaguars on September 12. "

I know they went on to say it was unlikely, but that is what the reports are coming out of Denver, and until Im proven wrong, I’ll believe it.

And our plan B is very good. If we find out Clady is done for a while, we would slide Ryan Harris to left, who is a great OT who has just been in the shadow of Clady. He was a 3rd rounder out of ND who had 1st round potential but was hurt his senior year. Although that would leave the RT up to rookie Zane Beadles, and I wouldnt want to throw a rookie in before he is ready.

But again, not blind optimism, reports say regular season opener and I’ll believe it until proven otherwise

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

You don't seem to acknowledge our upgrades at the DE, DT

positions and how they could affect greatly the “Lack of pass rush”

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not saying you'll be an easy team to beat

Just saying I dont think Clady will been thrown into the fire, like if he had to open up vs. Pitt or Indy, etc. Teams with great pass rushers.

Your pass rush probably will be improved (cant get much worse) but until your team shows the improvement on the field, I’ll stick with my “Lack of pass rush” analysis.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 19, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats fine

I just wanted you to admit the pass rush improved

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

well…there was nowhere to go but up, but I would not still put it outside of the bottom 5 in the league. So lets say it improves from 32nd to 29th…big deal.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 20, 2010 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I predict it to go higher than 29th

You don’t know how well or how poor the rookies but i believe they’ll do okay at least. Then theres a proven guy in Aaron whose ahead of schedule on his injury.

Along with a new, good D line coach I think early 20s

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 21, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t know how well or how poor the rookies but i believe they’ll do okay at least.

Define “okay”

Is it okay production for all DEs taken in the draft? I say likely not.

Is it okay production for DEs taken in the later rounds from an FCS school? then definitely.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

the definition of "ok"

1. all right; proceeding normally; satisfactory or under control
2. correct, permissible, or acceptable; meeting standards

By okay i mean, they’ll have some sacks say 4 or 5 but not more because of the learning curve.

Whats acceptable for a rookie to you?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lane and Hart will not have 4 sacks their first year. That is ridiculous.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was referring mainly to

Alualu and Hart. I think you’ll see Hart is a beast during the regular season.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

its possible, but not probable and I don’t see much evidence to support the notion.

I think Brian Robiskie is going to catch 70 passes…see I can say a guy can be a beast with no basis too…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is Robiskie's

Chance of having a semi good year next year. I hear he was sort of a bust last year since he was referred to as being the most NFL ready receiver in the draft. A lot of receivers may have slow starts to their careers, but this guy was hyped up by many as someone who could contribute right away.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear he was sort of a bust last year

yeah…because a guy is a bust after one season…and quickly getting buried in the depth chart and taking time to digest the playbook certainly helped him get playing time.

My point is (which should be fairly obvious) not about robiskie, but the fact that saying that hart and Lane will do much of anything at this point is pure speculation on no basis…

at least there is some basis for Robiskie in that he was a first few round talent AND that he has looked good so far. Now i doubt he will be that great because of what we have seen so far in minicamp, but how is it any less likely that he does well compared to these other Minicamp gems?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't

Asking about Robiskie with sarcasm. I don’t think the two new pass rushers are going to do much next year, especially Lane. Best case scenario Hart becomes a DPR type that gets some pressure.

You didn’t read my whole comment. I said he was sort of a bust because of how much he was hyped as being NFL ready. Everyone on ESPN and NFL Network said he’d be ready to be a third receiver in his first year.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

…and i understand they were saying that…but they were putting unfair expectations on a rookie WR, even if he was considered more “nfl ready”.

Mainly, I believe no receiver is truly “nfl ready” coming out of college (and all need a lot of work) and having 2 terrible QBs probably didn’t help the transition at all

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

completely ridiculous. I wouldn’t expect them to have 4 sacks COMBINED. the problem is that many jag fans seem to EXPECT every draft pick to have good production right away because it happened with Gene Smiths first draft last year.

Having that happen, even for an excellent GM, is more of an anomaly. And a 5th round FCS pass rusher contributing his rookie year would be an anomaly, let alone 2 on the SAME TEAM.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

A 5th round player from the FCS

is more than likely to be a backup and even more likely to go un-noticed.

Hart can start and replace Harvey on passing downs and eventually start later in the season.

This team has plenty of oppertunities for rookies, let alone forgotten FCS players to contribute.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

for sure there will be opportunities, but besides the fact that these guys will have a steep learning curve from FCS to the NFL and aren’t truly elite talents, Hart has something working against him

Larry Hart went to a community college to play. yes, this seems lie a weird thing to use as an example. However Football Outsiders recently wrote an article about a new stat (that is pretty accurate) to predict success at rushing the passer, called SackSEER. going to a CC counted against guys in terms of experience, especially since almost every single pass rusher that started at one was a large bust.

Lane I think has some of the physical skills needed, but he not only struggled majorly in the senior bowl, but also sometimes struggled against upper tier FCS teams…if he can’t do well against the best FCS teams, how will he make it in the NFL?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bross, I have to disagree here. Lane impressed at the senior bowl.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotta rep my Kentucky boys.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought it seemed like he was definitely overmatched at times.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since when is a 5th rounder guarunteed to be a starter?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did i say guarunteed?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you say he will have 4 or 5 sacks, yes.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 24, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not saying

He will get those sacks, but a DPR can get 4-5 sacks playing in pass situations.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

he can if he is a solid NFL player but that isn’t at all clear about Hart.

I think Lane will be the better player personally anyways.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

 Which teams do you think your D-line is better than?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

Buffalo, Carolina, detroit, st louis, cleveland, tampa bay, kansas city, seattle, oakland

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

HAHAHA what a terrible post

Maybe Buffalo, KC and Seattle, not definitely not the other teams.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Jun 22, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bow to your greater knowledge

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d say Detroit is even with you because I think Vanden Bosch will be about even with Kampman and Suh will be better than anyone you have. Plus Hill and Williams should be solid.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Suh will be equal to Knighton

D-Lineman have a learning curve and i expect over time Suh will be better but this year, Knighton’s better.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oakland has Seymour who is much better than anyone on your line, plus they added Henderson, Houston, and Wimbley. Shaugnessy (sp) should be solid in his second year.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh yippee they added Henderson

They picked up the guy we didn’t want anymore. Championship!(voice of the guy from the fantasy football commercial)

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, you are still ignoring everything else I said. And Henderson is alright.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since when are you entitled to a response to all your points

When you have constantly ignored mine on this site?

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 23, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

??

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

And even if it does only go from 32nd to 29th

It’ll be about double the sack total. So that would have to have an impact, right?

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 21, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

it all depends on how other teams go too. I think they may get like 20-23 sacks which is more than last year (I believe 12) but still leaving QBs all day to throw and still not getting good enough pressure to help out the secondary.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t say DT was a huge upgrade because you lost Henderson.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 20, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Was it an upgrade, yes or no

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 20, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

and Alualu will be a factor? Everything I see about him points to a guy who won’t make a big impact at all this year.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 20, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

well…

a) he is a DT and even elite pass rushing DTs don’t often make an impact in the pass rush

b) he just doesn’t seem to be a game changer on the NFL level in terms of his skills. I like his high energy that he brings and that he hustles on every play though.

c) Nothing about him stands out besides his motor. He has an average burst off the line from what I have seen (and this is the consensus from most scouting reports I have read too). He is slightly undersized and did get controlled by some bigger, stronger O-Lineman. He doesn’t have elite speed either and doesn’t have the strength to beat the double team (let alone the one on one guard consistently).

Basically, he could end up being decent, but I doubt it next year and I don’t see him having that high of a ceiling.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think a big problem with him

was he was asked to play 3-4 DE, and was not very good at it At the senior bowl, he played in the 4-3 and reports say he did very well there. So essentially his entire college career was played out of position.

Also in the Senior bowl he displayed a great pass rush. He was owning some of the nation’s best interior lineman (not Pouncey of course).

So my point is take his college film (if you did watch it) with a grain of salt.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

So my point is take his college film (if you did watch it) with a grain of salt.

You have to take everything with a grain of salt. How does the Senior Bowl matter more than his film..or his production…or his physical skills. I try to take them all into account and not that I think he will be terrible, i just don’t see an elite player.

He could be good eventually, I just don’t see the guy making a big impact next year. As DTs go, I think he might be a safer pick in some ways. Because of his motor, he will always have a place on an NFL team and will make some plays…I just don’t see him having a ton of upside.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well in the senior bowl

he played in his more natural position and against he nations top seniors. No slouches there

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

so we should just ignore everything else because he had one good game? think about that for a second.

yes, the senior bowl is important, but drafting is a quantitative analysis. you don’t just find one area and stick with it. You have to look at every aspect and senior bowl definitely has its place, but so does everything else.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

You make it sound like he was a slouch all through college

He had the same stats as Gerald McCoy. On that note, he had better measurables. Quantitatively, Alualu fits the mold.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

well…I thought McCoy was overdrafted too personally and may not have a huge impact in the NFL…

Still a bit different stats:

McCoy: 33 TFLs, Alualu 25 TFLs

McCoy: 15 Sacks, Alualu: 16 Sacks

McCoy: 22 QB Hurries, Alualu: 11

Yes, Alualu put up similar stats, but its clear by these and watching both on tape that McCoy had a quicker first step and that he was better at getting backfield penetration.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alualu was in a 3-4

And played a read and react style defense. Of course McCoy had more penetration. Watch Alualu’s junior year when he was in a 4-3 and I’m positive you’d see otherwise. He definitely had a great explosion off the line.

With that said, there’s a reason Alualu’s 40 time, 10 yard dash time and vertical jump are all higher than McCoy’s. All of those indicate explosiveness and first step.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

40 times do not say much about first step.

And you shouldn’t have said his stats are the same if they weren’t.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

within reason

the stats were similar

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

To make you feel better, McCoy is going to suck in the NFL too. he has Dorsey written all over him. Alualu is going to suck, simple as that. In his game tape I saw him picking himself up off the turf as much as he was getting through the line of scrimmage.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Jun 22, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your horrible man

all these opinions based on the little 5 second clips you may watch

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

So did you watch every minute of him on the field?

It’s irrelevant anyway. Alualu got pushed around playing against crappy Pac-10 teams. He’s undersized, weak, and has terrible balance. Like I said he spent as much time on the ground as he did standing, and yet you think he’s going to have an effect in the NFL?

by The Licensed Pessimist on Jun 22, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

i've watched him

however, I trust in the professional scouting of the Jaguars than you

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, back to this. You might as well just say YOU WIN!!!

How about this; I trust the Bucs staff that McCoy is better than Alualu

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well the Bucs have been doing so

well recently, its not like they’ve not been missing the playoffs every year since that superbowl

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both teams are drafting in the top 10.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

exactly…you can’t talk to these people on here sometimes…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I watched some and he got a bit more penetration, but still not as much as I saw from McCoy in a 4-3

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I did. He looks good and I like his motor like I said, he just always look like an impact first rounder.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it is a stretch to call Ryan Harris a great OT. I would say he is a solid starter at RT, but maybe average at LT…I guess you could survive with him at LT and beadles at RT, but I thought beadles was going to move to Center…thats what I heard…So who plays at center???

This injury is a significant problem that can’t just be thrown away like its nothing.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 20, 2010 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Harris I would say could be called great

Him going down really hurt us, and was one of the major reasons why we went from 6-0 to 2-8. He plays similar to Clady: really good in pass pro almost makes you forget how good of a run blocker he is. He’s not as good as Clady, but if he moved there I think I’d be more worried about what is happening at RT

Beadles played both LG and RT in minicamp. His position in training camp should be telling on how Clady is doing. Again, I am not blowing over the injury. I think it sucks and it would really hurt us if we lose him for even a couple of games. However, reports from Denver say he should be back by the opener, and until they are proven wrong, I’ll believe it

And no Beadles at C. JD Waldons there, a 3rd rounder this year. All experts say he should have no problem adjusting to the pro game as a starter, and reports from minicamp have alluded to that already, albeit limited contact. He’s a big mauler in the middle with great size and should do better against NT’s than Wiegmann.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I forgot you guys got JD. I like him. I just heard something about beadles at C or something inside.

I like Harris but I think you are overexaggerating him a bit. He isn’t at all a mauler, not that Clady is a huge mauler either (though he is definitely very solid). I would say that Harris could end up being a bit better at LT because he is not at all a mauler and doesn’t have to do as much impact run blocking.

However, his athleticism is not as good as clady’s and I don’t think he has the speed to keep up with edge rushers. He is a solid technician but he isn’t anything above league average. that is solid for a replacement, but I wouldn’t say that you should expect there to be no dropoff.

I think saying even an elite RT (like Tauscher or Runyan in their prime, or Jordan Gross) is the cause of that kind of change in record is a ridiculous stretch. maybe it contributes but there have to be a lot of other factors at play (primarily the collapse of the D). did Harris cause the D to suddenly suck? This is a ludicrous assumption.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Didnt say Harris was a mauler

Just said that like Clady, he is very good in pass pro so it people tend to underestimate in in run blocking, as you yourself are.

Yes of course Harris is no where near Clady athletically. If memory serves me right, Clady was a TE they moved to the OL.

I truly think you are seriously underestimating Harris. He is well above the league average. Many experts will agree with me here.

D didnt suddenly suck. The D was just always on the field because they couldnt run the ball or pass as well without Harris. The O was far more atrocious than the D that stretch, particularly running the ball.

It is not a ludicrous assumption, clearly I didnt say he was the reason. I said he was a major factor in it. I would like to hear anyone else who follows Denver say otherwise.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have never seen anything from harris in the 5-6 games of Denver I have watched to say he is anything special run blocking.

I didn’t say he wasn’t above league average for RT. He is definitely an above average player for that position. However, I see him at most being a middle of the road starter at LT (about league average at starter, which is still maybe better than an above average RT).

I never said that you were saying that Harris was the only factor. My only point is not even an all pro RT can have the sort of impact you are trying to say he had.

-Did the Injury to harris suddenly make orton start making bad decisions?

-How come if the offense couldn’t move the ball, they only average a couple points less per game without him, only about 30 more yards, and less than one less first down? sounds like the O was a little worse, but where is this collapse?

-The D after he was gone was giving up 5 more first downs a game, Giving up SEVENTEEN more points per game, and Almost ONE HUNDRED more yards per game.

Even if you want to assume that the correlation between Harris’ injury and a small decline in offense is causation (which there is little evidence to prove in of itself), there is nothing to suggest that Harris had ANYTHING to do with the collapse in D.

You want me to believe that because of these offensive ineptitudes, the defense got dominated in TOP and total plays. that just isn’t the case.

the D only was on the field for about 3 more plays a game after the injury, or one 3 and out series…but they gave up almost 100 more yards

-Total yards per play went from 4.3 to almost 5.7
-Sacks per game was cut in half (3.4-1.5)
-Went from an elite Run D (3.3 ypc) to a terrible one (5.2 ypc)
-Passing D let up one more yard per play
-They were even committing more penalties (1.7 more for about 20 more yards per game in penalties).

How is Harris a major cause of all of this? I dunno if even Peyton owuld have this major of an impact.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you think orton will improve when you take away what he relies on?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 17, 2010 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

he relied on him

in most of our losses. Thats a fact look it up. Not sayin it will make us better, or we will easily overcome losing BMarsh. I just think our team is better off mostly because of his antics, and also it will force Orton to spread the ball around more, which he failed to do when he got too dependent on BMarsh. In the 6-0 run, we spread the ball around A LOT more than we did going 2-8

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like making exact predictions

that’s a fools errand. I am just contending the list candidates in relation to the Broncos. I would say that the Panthers and possibly the Jags will be better. If I had to narrow it down, the Jags have a much tougher schedule than either the Broncos or the Panthers, but I would bet that the Panthers win more games than the Broncos. Gentleman’s style of course, that’s how it would have to be on the internet. of course the season opener is Broncos at Jags. That’s one game, so random chance plays a much larger part in that as opposed to the season, but again, gentleman’s style I would do it. Start it on that game, double or nothing for the Panthers vs. Broncos season. Bet we would come out even because the Broncos like starting strong. Not sure they have the gas in the tank this year though.

by einman77 on Jun 16, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well I included them in this post, does that make me a dumbass then?

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 17, 2010 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps

I’m not sure how you put them on there over teams like the Chiefs, Raiders and Seahawks, but I don’t know. He’s coming out and saying that Carolina is one of the worst teams in the NFL, which is a horribly uneducated statement to make considering they have the best running duo in the NFL, a great O-line, solid receivers, and a good defense. You’re just creating discussion.

Unless, Dan, do you think Carolina is in the bottom 5-8?

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 17, 2010 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I didn’t, I wouldn’t have put them in there.

I think the defense is going to be much worse this year losing Peppers. Without a pass rush, the DBs could be in trouble. I’m not a Matt Moore fan either. If he was good, they wouldn’t have used their first pick on a quarterback. Don’t see a great offensive line there, either. I see a great run blocking line, but an average pass block line.

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 17, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you watch Moore's last few games?

I mean seriously. Plus Clausen was considered a #1 overall pick by many, how can you pass that up at #48? And while we may not have Peppers, we do have Everette Brown, Charles Johnson, Tyler Brayton, Eric Norwood, and Greg Hardy. That group will be fine rushing the passer, run stuffing is what concerns me. And for O-line, factor in the injuries and Delhomme’s ineptitude before you judge them too harshly. Now obviously you have your opinion and I respect that, but I do believe that it is a misinformed opinion.

Good bye #43. Good luck in Chicago.

by Flowing Willow on Jun 20, 2010 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair

the only expertmade mock draft having him first overall was Walter Football…

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 20, 2010 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

...the rest still had him in the top 10-15

and with Moore being an unrestricted free agent after this season, Carolina couldn’t pass Clausen up at #48.

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 20, 2010 2:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Most

Had him going top 5.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 20, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

the Panthers are gonna be good this year

if they can avoid the rash of injuries they had last year of course, which of course Thomas Davis going down is not a good start.

Even with that, I would not be surprised to see them back at their 2008 form.

That opening day matchup between the Giants and Panthers should be a good one.

KEEP LEE!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 20, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

because a few games takes away all sorts of question marks. Countless QBs have had a couple good games, got a starting job, and then been terrible. A couple that come to mind are Derek Anderson and Brady Quinn.

Also consider the pressure Peppers takes off of others. you have to double team peppers and he STILL gets double digit sacks a season. this leaves mediocre players like Tyler Brayton open to rush the passer efficiently. When a guy like peppers leaves, you can’t just take away his sacks and say that will be the # your team gets. Look at the chiefs after Jared Allen…they plummeted, though Tamba Hali was a solid young player. that is the best example to this situation too. When a guy like peppers leaves, sack #s and pressure on the QB plummet.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Moore

Yes, it was only a few games, but he played extraordinarily well in those games, and it wasn’t by accident. In the 5 games that he started after he took over for Delhomme, he played the Giants, Vikings, and Patriots, among others, and threw no interceptions in those games, and 3 TDs in the domination of the Vikings and Giants. Coupled w/ the good OL, one of the most dependable receivers in the league and an overall improved receiving core, and the league’s best running attack, he can’t fail. If he does manage to pull a Delhomme, there’s a more than capable QB in Clausen who already knows the offense waiting in the wings.

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 21, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow…so many things wrong with this statement.

and it wasn’t by accident.

yes, there may be something there, but he still hasn’t proven anything…5 games in the grand scheme of the NFL is nothing. thats not even 1/3 of a season. If he can piece together 16 games of solid play, then he has proven something…It wasn’t on accident, but is it a valid cross section of what he will be as a QB? probably not

one of the most dependable receivers in the league and an overall improved receiving core

he is dependable but aging…Improved because of one unproven, 3rd round rookie? That isn’t much of an improvement. I still see an aging steve smith an nothing else.

and the league’s best running attack

Nope…did you not watch Chris Johnson? End of story.

he can’t fail.

I have never heard that an unproven guy Can’t fail. You could say the same with sanchez last year…but he had a better O-Line and better Receivers, but he still was pretty sucky (and has more talent than moore). He can obviously fail and it isn’t that unlikely

there’s a more than capable QB in Clausen who already knows the offense waiting in the wings.

Huh? So a rookie QB, especially one drafted in the 2nd round is already a more than capable backup and already knows this offense? there is no guarantee with young QBs, especially drafted outside the first round.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is dependable but aging…Improved because of one unproven, 3rd round rookie? That isn’t much of an improvement. I still see an aging steve smith an nothing else.

Yeah, he’s aging, but he’s still extremely quick with amazing hands, dedication, and probably the toughest player in the league. Yes, the receiving corps are improved, as well. Brandon LaFell is Moose V2, with his great blocking ability, but with much better speed and similar hands. Armanti Edwards has shown a lot of potential through OTAs as well, and Dwayne Jarrett capped off last season very well in the Saints game.

he is dependable but aging…Improved because of one unproven, 3rd round rookie? That isn’t much of an improvement. I still see an aging steve smith an nothing else.

Titans (CJ and LenDale) – 2,228 yards, 16 TD
Carolina (DeAngelo & Stewart) – 2,250 yards, 17 TD

I have never heard that an unproven guy Can’t fail. You could say the same with sanchez last year…but he had a better O-Line and better Receivers, but he still was pretty sucky (and has more talent than moore). He can obviously fail and it isn’t that unlikely

I obviously didn’t mean he can’t fail, I meant it in the sense that with all of the weapons around him, good defense, and strong finish last year, I don’t see anything that would make him fall off. Having the 2nd easiest schedule in the NFL, I believe, just helps the cause.

Huh? So a rookie QB, especially one drafted in the 2nd round is already a more than capable backup and already knows this offense? there is no guarantee with young QBs, especially drafted outside the first round.

Why does it matter when he was drafted? In every single mock draft, Clausen was projected in the top 15. All of them. Just because he fell doesn’t mean his obvious skills diminish. Yes, he already knows the offense. Jeff Davidson (Carolina OC) coached under Charlie Weiss, Clausen’s college coach, and Davidson brought almost the exact same playbook to Carolina as he used at Notre Dame, so Clausen does already know the offense.

I don’t see why you keep bringing up the “especially drafted outside the first round” stuff. Some of the best QBs in NFL history were drafted outside of the 1st round, and still, Clausen is 1st round material.

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 22, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

but he’s still extremely quick with amazing hands, dedication, and probably the toughest player in the league.

but he IS aging and may not be elite anymore…plus, I dunno if you heard, he just got injured.

Wow…so you have a 3rd round receiver who is definitely going to contribute in 2010? I dunno if you have been living under a rock, but WR has one of the steepest learning curves for the NFL.

So you guys drafted an FCS QB and are going to put him at WR? Who cares what he does in OTAs. I dunno what you guys in Carolina have been watching with your ridiculous optimism, but us realist fans in cleveland understand that how a guy looks in OTAs doesn’t mean squat, especially since the offense ALWAYS looks better.

I obviously didn’t mean he can’t fail, I meant it in the sense that with all of the weapons around him, good defense, and strong finish last year, I don’t see anything that would make him fall off. Having the 2nd easiest in the NFL, I believe, just helps the cause.

well, more talented players have failed in even more favorable conditions. Well, who knows how the teams will do in 2010 that they faced.

Why does it matter when he was drafted? In every single mock draft, Clausen was projected in the top 15. All of them

same logic Michael Crabtree used to hold out. MOCK drafts. Well, i would take the views of all 30 GMs that passed over him over the scouts.

Just because he fell doesn’t mean his obvious skills diminish.

No, it means 30 NFL teams saw something that mock drafters and fans didn’t.

Jeff Davidson (Carolina OC) coached under Charlie Weiss, Clausen’s college coach, and Davidson brought almost the exact same playbook to Carolina as he used at Notre Dame

wow…you have seen the whole of both playbooks?

Just from watching Weis at ND, the offense did look different than in New England. Davidson also does not run the exact same playbook that he ran in New England. He coached under Carthon in cleveland and while Carthon did coach on some Parcells teams, his offense is not the same as Parcells’ which isn’t the same as Weis’. Davidson’s has some carthon influences…yes some terminology will be the same, but saying he will be great in the offense is like saying the browns should start Seneca Wallace because Holmgren is bringing some of the terminology he used in Seattle.

I don’t see why you keep bringing up the "especially drafted outside the first round" stuff. Some of the best QBs in NFL history were drafted outside of the 1st round

What is the success rate of QBs drafted outside the first round? Yes, QBs outside of the first do well, but that is more of the exception than the rule. Most of the good starting QBs in the league were drafted in the first round. QB does not have a good success rate but it gets even worse outside of the first

This is an article written on DBN about how QBs do: http://www.dawgsbynature.com/2010/2/12/1301776/how-to-beat-the-house-qb-edition

For every Tom Brady there are 9 Ken Dorsey’s. It is a nice idea to get a QB late in the draft, but for a team to count on that player being a good QB is a horrible idea.
and still, Clausen is 1st round material.

says you and self proclaimed “experts” like Walter Cherepinsky. If he was first round material,

why did the Browns (twice) , Minnesota, Buffalo (twice), Arizona (twice), Seattle (twice), San Francisco (3 times), Jacksonville and Washington all pass on him…I will trust these GMs opinions over yours because the General Consensus was that he wasn’t a first rounder.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

but us realist fans in cleveland understand that how a guy looks in OTAs doesn’t mean squat, especially since the offense ALWAYS looks better.

That is ridiculous. You are predicting Delhomme to be solid and Cleveland to win 8 games. Don’t give us this “everyone is a homer but me!” bs.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are predicting Delhomme to be solid and Cleveland to win 8 games. Don’t give us this "everyone is a homer but me!" bs.

when Did I say the browns would win 8 games? I would be happy for 7 but I think many things would have to go right. I am thinking maybe 6 games for the browns.

When I say solid on DBN (if I in fact used those words), a lot of it is compared to our other QBs. If he can give us stats like we had from Jeff Garcia and Dilfer in cleveland I would be happy. i would be happy with a 78 QB rating and a 1:1 TD/INT ratio. IF I had to put an over/under on his QB rating at 76.5 I would take the under. So I think he might be average, but not at all that good.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Clausen wasn’t a Ken Dorsey 7th round flyer, he was a 2nd round pick most thought would be a first.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, 30 teams decided he wasn’t a first rounder. what scouts say doesn’t matter, its what GMs say that matters more. these guys have the most info so I will go with the GMs that didn’t think he was a first rounder.

I don’t think clausen will be bad, in fact I think that he has a better chance than most at being a successful QB outside of the first round. However, the success rates outside of the first are low and we are talking about production as a rookie too…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

who is going to rush the passer on D? Julius peppers commanded a ton of pressure and let guys like Tyler Brayton get to the QB better than they did on other teams. There are some decent talents (everette brown, Hardy, Norwood) but no one who is proven and no one without major question marks. The Pass rush is the backbone of any D and its hard to have a good D without a solid backbone. The only position I would consider “good” are the linebackers and possibly the Corners, though the latter always benefitted from peppers’ pressure.

I see a team with an average defense, average receivers (one aging star and a very subpar cast around him), Solid line (maybe good, but definitely held back because they aren’t elite at protecting the QB), and big question marks at QB. They can probably win 3-4 games with their RBs, but I dunno how many more wins the rest of the team will give the…could be 5, could be 1-2.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would select St. Louis. The unlikelihood of the team who got the number 1 pick last year getting it this year is mostly related to the unlikelihood of any given team getting the number 1 pick from the beginning of the season. Sam Bradford and co aren’t going to magically turn St. Louis around. Consider the most recent teams to pick a QB number 1 overall, and how they fared. Detroit -2, Oakland – 4, SF – 6. The teams that did perform well the year after taking a QB with a number 1 pick, did it with a different QB than the one they picked, SD with Brees and Cincy with Kitna

by math_geek on Jun 15, 2010 4:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I could go with the easy answer and go St. Louis...

but I’ll say Buffalo.

Their offensive line is weak, the quarterback is questionable, an unproven rookie (Spiller) is their best offensive weapon, they have a question marks along their DLine (in a 3-4 no less)…….Jairus Byrd’s great, but, aside from his wild 5 week stretch, he didn’t do a whole lot else. They play in a tough division….and I don’t see a whole lot of wins.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 15, 2010 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Buffalo

for the above reasons…

No Offensive Line or QB and instead of grabbing one in the draft, they get a RB to compliment (or replace) another 1st round RB. They’ll get beat up on quite a bit in their division and will be lucky to win 3 games.

St. Louis at least gets to play a rebuilding Seattle and Arizona team. They also have the answer to their QB questions. They should win about 5 games.

Detroit may not even be the worst team in their division. If they can keep Stafford standing up they should finish ahead of Chicago.

My order:
Buffalo
St. Louis
Cleveland
Jacksonville
Chicago
Tampa Bay
Detroit
Carolina
Oakland (Campbell is a much much much better option than anyone they have had recently)

by BlueVol03 on Jun 15, 2010 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

oh yeah

and don’t forget about the Titans (they may be missing a QB for the first few games). I’d put them 10th on my list

by BlueVol03 on Jun 15, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

how is detroit that high? is Matt Stafford suddenly going to become Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

no,

he’s suddenly going to become Peyton Manning

by beef99 on Jun 16, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I vote for Cleveland mainly because I think Jake Delhomme is that bad. Worse, even, than Trent Edwards. They have two guys calling the shots in Holmgren and Mangini instead of a top-down structure.

But I won’t be mad if it’s Buffalo. Underestimate them. We’ve got you right where we want you.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jun 15, 2010 5:30 PM EDT reply actions  

but at least delhomme can get loyalty in a huddle from his players…I don’t see anyone who can be significantly better statistically AND do that in Buffalo, St. Louis, or Tampa at this point.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would take Freeman over Delhomme.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would take freeman eventually…but not at all right now…Freeman was somewhat a project guy coming out of college and I didn’t see much last season from him.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

He was inconsistent but had good games.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

*some good games.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats true. He had a couple decent games, but so did Derek Anderson in 2008. He was pretty bad most of the time and IMO, is not even an average NFL QB at this point.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Delhomme is MUCH better than Edwards

He actually has experience and has proven he can get it done. People over-exaggerate how bad he is. Yes, he had a horrible season, but it’s not like someone shot him in the head. He can still play.

And this is coming from a Panthers fan. Y’know, the team who Delhomme killed last year.

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 16, 2010 4:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

As I continue to say in other places, experience and “proven” only get you so far until you become Gordie Howe playing in the minors. Delhomme CLEARLY lost his skills last year. It’s why the Panthers went with Matt Moore despite owing Delhommme a boatload of money.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jun 16, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

It really isn’t CLEAR what caused the diminish last season. Many believe it was a lack of confidence and that he tried to force bad throws and make decisions he didn’t make earlier in his career. Watching him, this theory makes more sense. If he can come in with little to no pressure on him and not be forced to do too much, I think him turning it around wouldn’t be that hard. all that is CLEAR is he had a bad season.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Everybody's going to give the Rams first look

and rightfully so, but Rams fans know we were painfully close to winning a handful of games last year. And while many of us pined throughout the season that it didn’t happen (and up to the draft, for those in the DT camp who wanted either Suh or G. McCoy), we ended up with a franchise QB, so not too much love lost.
  We also had a tough opening schedule last year, and that isn’t the case for 2010. I doubt we’ll improve by too much record-wise, but I wouldn’t be overly surprised to see us finish with up to 6 wins if injuries don’t play a huge factor (although early nagging injuries to the O-line have everyone worried).
  As for my vote, I’ll take Buffalo. Sorry MRW.

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Jun 15, 2010 5:33 PM EDT reply actions  

By your argument, the Bills were also painfully close from winning a few games last year including against the Patriots. :-)

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jun 15, 2010 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

That argument of close games applies to everyone

Even the Lions in 08. I understand ur point, but the same can be said for every team as well

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bills

No QB, No O-linemen, No WR’s

by Yankees10 on Jun 15, 2010 6:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Cleveland by far

Not only the worst, but the most pathetic franchise in the NFL.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 15, 2010 6:55 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

The Driver of the Sweed Bus - All aboard, next stop 70 Catches 900 Yards 7TD's
^ Ooooops did I jinx it?

DaMon Cromartie Smith to make the 53 Man Roster!

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jun 15, 2010 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

And they beat you last year.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 15, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

We also have 6 Lombardi Trophies whereas they are constant bottom feeders

therefore the most pathetic franchise in the NFL.

The Driver of the Sweed Bus - All aboard, next stop 70 Catches 900 Yards 7TD's
^ Ooooops did I jinx it?

DaMon Cromartie Smith to make the 53 Man Roster!

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jun 15, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

And up to that point we had beaten them 8 straight times

I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
We just dumped a problem WR just so we could draft another?

by Steel in FL on Jun 15, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

strawman much?

how does a good franchise beating the browns prove they are the worst team in the league?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

the strawman below applies to you too…

how “pathetic” they are and how many lombardi trophies the steelers have has nothing to do with how many wins the browns will get and therefore proves nothing.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nor was it supposed to

While the Browns belong on this list they aren’t the going to be in the running for first overall pick. they have a good O-line and they finally got a RB. Mohamad whatishisname is a decent receiver. They finally got somebody who resembles a QB. And they address their weakest point with Haden.

Compared to St Louis who is getting rid of their best D player. Or Buffalo who who’s greatest asset thier RB’s require good performance from their weakest.
Clevland will be top ten. But probably wont be below 5th

I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
We just dumped a problem WR just so we could draft another?

by Steel in FL on Jun 16, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

and I can definitely agree with this…finally a sensible fan from the steelers or Ravens. The reason this was even brought up was incessant trolling from Steelers/Ravens fans…not just on here but on DBN too…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

and this is where the intelligent arguments (extreme /sarc) by these ravens and steelers fans hijack the thread with their truly insightful wisdom.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I have plenty of insightful wisdom for why Cleveland is the laughing stock of the NFL. What does it matter to you? You are a Jets fan. The pole asked who the worst team in the NFL is, and I stated who I thought is the worst.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 16, 2010 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

What does it matter to you? You are a Jets fan.

Never mind that. Guess you just have a Braylon crush still.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 16, 2010 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow really? I have a picture of braylon MISSING A CATCH…I think it is pretty clear by the picture that it is braylon edwards making a bad play and it pleases me everytime he does that in a jets uniform…

but please, give some insightful wisdom for once. i have never heard it from you. you are always on DBN and all you say is stuff like " browns suck" or “browns are the laughingstock of the NFL” or “you guys will be terrible this season”

Troll: someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response
Trolling: what Mr. MaLoR does on every SBN website besides the ones for his favorite teams

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t really see Carolina being bad. They have a very good O-line and the beat RB duo in the NFL. It is very reasonable to expect at least 1 of the QBs on the team to do well. They also drafted 3 WRs so the defenses can’t just key in on smith

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 15, 2010 7:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Are they your new favorite team because JimmyClausenIsBeast now?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 15, 2010 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 15, 2010 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thought you were now a Broncos fan lol

Lead organizer of the annual 7 round live mock draft at MtD and Moderator

by TheAngelsColts on Jun 15, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope Clausen never takes a snap.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is Jacksonville on this list?

This was a team that went into December in control of it’s playoff destiny. Sure it $hit the bed, but it was a more entertaining ride than the 2008 campaign.

The team has the most complete RB in the NFL, one of the best LB corps in the NFL, and an offensive line that should be among the best in the league this year. Is David Garrard a mediocre QB? Sure. Will he be gone by this time next year if Gene Smith has his way? Yep.

The one unit that could qualify the Jaguars for this list, the defense line, was effectively nuked this offseason. Between releasing Coach Ted Monachino, adding Joe Cullen, Aaron Kampman, and Tyson Alualu, the unit will at least be respectable in 2010.

Big Cat Country, The #1 Jaguars blog on the net

by Jonathan Loesche on Jun 15, 2010 7:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Same can be said for Carolina

They have no business being on this list. Best RB core in the NFL, great O-line, solid QB, solid receivers, good secondary, 2nd best LB in the league. Yes there are some question marks (DL and LBs (due to Thomas Davis being out for the season again)), but they’re not nearly parallel with the other teams on this list.

by Ol' Uncle Munnerlyn on Jun 15, 2010 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would have to agree...

Jacksonville’s competitive. I see a lot of their games coming down to one possession. It’s not a roster riddled with all-stars, but Jacksonville’s better than, say, Denver.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 15, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Word

We almost beat the Colts twice. The second Titans game was in our grasp until the secondary dropped two interceptions and our third string safety missed an easy tackle on the fastest runningback in the league. Cardinals game we sucked but Garrard was doing well. (Irrelevant, but I don’t miss a chance to defend Garrard.) Seattle game was a fluke. Dolphins game came down to a few plays. And the Browns was a given up effort.

In my eyes we could have easily won 3 more of those games and ended up with ten wins. Say one of the Colts games, the Seattle game and Browns.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 15, 2010 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

you could say a team almost wins a lot of games but that stuff doesn’t count and really doesn’t matter in an objective analysis.

you can always point the blame but if your team loses, they lose. I used to not be able to accept my teams losses when i though they should have won for some reason but the were robbed/blew it/sabatoged by a bad call…

you accept losses, you don’t make excuses.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not making excuses

We played downright horrible at times last year. 49ers game we couldn’t do anything. The Browns game came down to not being able to stop the Browns run game.

Not trying to say we were a ten win team, but I am saying we had the chance to get there. No matter what, Jacksonville shouldn’t even be in consideration for worst team in the league.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 16, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

why shouldn’t they? how have they significantly improved? If anything, they overachieved in many’s eyes last year..they improved IMO much less than teams below them, AND the fact that they may have overachieved leads me to believe that they could drop from an average team to a below average and possibly a pretty bad team.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Jags

Are more talented than the Rams or Lions or Browns. Sorry, they just are. Team isn’t over flowing with pro bowlers by any means, but they have a ton of solid players, underrated players, and players that are going to get better.

The younger players getting better is how we have/are going to improve. We were in a rebuilding stage last year.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

but they have a ton of solid players, underrated players, and players that are going to get better

I bet you rams, Lions and Browns fans would tell you the same thing.

Are you telling me that there are not solid players, underrated players, or guys going to get better on these other teams?

I still agree that they are better, but this is irrelevant to the point that I started about. A lot of teams lose close games and can make an excuse for certain games. Plus, a team can still have a bad season without being the worst team.

Best case scenario for them I see this year as being 7-8 wins…If injuries start to happen and things go wrong, then I can see them getting only 5 and being among the worst…

Yes, younger players get better…but guys also regress, and teams that were almost as bad (5-7 win teams like the browns, raiders, 49ers) have young players two, plus also improved more with acquisitions IMO.

The jags are at a crossroads. they need garrard and some other people to step up and be leaders. they could win 8 games, or they could win 4…that is how much variation there is. The jags are a team without much of an identity or leadership and without either could falter.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

No

The Lions have Calvin Johnson and Kevin Smith. The Browns have Josh Cribbs and Joe Thomas. The Rams have Steven Jackson and James Laurinaitis. Jags have more of those than the other three.

I agree with you about close games. I was just saying above how we could have been better, but could have been worse also.

I think our best case scenario could be 10 or 11 wins. If things go wrong of course we could win 5 games. Thats any team in this league.

Thats the point. We have a very young team at most positions. Guys regress, but there aren’t too many starters or even backups that are in the twilight of their careers on the Jags roster. I’d take our rookie class from the last two years over the class of the Raiders, Browns or 49ers any day.

Maurice Jones-Drew and Daryl Smith are two leaders, each in their own way. Montell Owens leads by example. Marcedes Lewis emerged as a leader who just wanted to win, and as a result, he even played better, late in the year. Jags don’t lack leadership. Just because they don’t have a linebacker dancing out of the helmet or a safety crawling out of the tunnel pre-game doesn’t mean they lack leadership

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Lions have Calvin Johnson and Kevin Smith. The Browns have Josh Cribbs and Joe Thomas. The Rams have Steven Jackson and James Laurinaitis. Jags have more of those than the other three.

i think now you are now looking at this in an obvious biased and homer tone.

The lions just have Smith and CJ? What about Delmas? Suh? Backus is at least solid and definitely underrated. Scheffler?

We are talking about solid players, and underrated players. I don’t see any more of these on the Jags than other teams really…or at least not a significant number.

I just don’t see where the talent is to win 10 games…The jags to me have a ‘meh’ defense that gives QBs all day to throw and is somewhat soft up the middle…they have a ‘meh’ passing game but a great running game. You can’t win 11 games with just MJD.

I’d take our rookie class from the last two years over the class of the Raiders, Browns or 49ers any day.

I would take the browns and 49ers drafts of this year in a heartbeat over the Jags. the browns are under new ownership and a new regime so previous drafts are not very relevant.

Just because they don’t have a linebacker dancing out of the helmet or a safety crawling out of the tunnel pre-game doesn’t mean they lack leadership

yes, the team has leaders, but I believe the season hinges on the leadership of the more veteran players and establishing an identity. If this team doesn’t establish an identity, doesn’t have leaders step up, I see a very blase that wins about 6 games.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on man

Obviously I’m not going to name every solid or underrated player on each teams roster. I was just giving examples.

A lot of people may say they don’t see where the talent is. I’m not trying to over hype the team, but we do have some potential playmakers next year on the offensive side of the ball, and studs on defense. Zack Miller, Mike Thomas, Tiquan Underwood, and Troy Williamson are all guys who have shown flashes that will finally get an opportunity this year. Like I said, not sayin they are pro bowlers next year, but they have potential to be sweet.

The passing game will improve, barring serious injuries. The two tackles will be in their second year and they, especially Eugene Monroe, should stand out. The interior is improved as well.

I would take the browns and 49ers drafts of this year in a heartbeat over the Jags. the browns are under new ownership and a new regime so previous drafts are not very relevant.

I can see the 49ers draft. They got two tackles, and I really like Taylor Mays and Anthony Dixon. I can see the Browns too. Keep your opinion. Five years we can look back and see the best class. Our class last year, what I was really getting at when I said past two years, has already proven to be special and will be further proven special. I’ll take our 2009 class over any of those teams.

Whatever you say about leadership. Can’t speak anymore about that and the teams identity until the season starts.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

obviously you aren’t going to name every player, because if you did, it would show that the Jags have no better players or you would skip an obvious good player because of this higher standard you hold other teams players to. A player at a similar level on another team is somehow not as good in your eyes it seems.

Please don’t say troy williamson will be anything good. that is just foolish. At this point, I would rather have an unproven guy than him. Saying troy williamson could be a good player this year and solid loses you some credibility.

has already proven to be special and will be further proven special. I’ll take our 2009 class over any of those teams.

wow…jumping the gun? Now, the rookies in the Jags draft made a good impact their first year. However, you cannot accurately judge a draft until after 3 years. Because guys from a draft make impacts as rookies does not automatically make the draft “special”. I think it would be a good draft, but it definitely has NOT proven to be special…it has proven it has the potential to be special, but you can say the same with a lot of drafts.

You know what, I would take the browns team over the Jags 2009 Draft class.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

You haven't watched the Jaguars 2009 draft class much

At this point in time, I think any GM in the league would take the Jaguars class from last year over their own.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would say that so far, their draft has maybe performed the best and I would definitely take it over the browns draft…but he was saying he would take it over certain teams, which I wouldn’t.

I also think its early to call a draft proven to be special.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we're going to say we can't count a draft

becuase its too early then you can’t count anyone elses draft class. Ndamukong and company along with any other 1st or 2nd player

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. So far, the draft looks great but I still say its too early to tel with anyone’s class.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats sensible

I agree and we can debate it after this season.

And i guess thats one of the points that i usually agree with is that it’s too early to say this team is the worst because of the weakness here and here and because of their draft class.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see

How you can argue the Jags roster is the same talent wise as the Lions. The Lions have had two good drafts the past two years but the Jags roster is more talented at every position except maybe LT, WR, and select places on the defensive line.

Troy Williamson had a great pre-season, and I named him as a potential factor in our offense. If you saw his pre-season last year you would see why I have hopes for him.

Yeah you can’t judge a draft until three years. But a class that has that many rookies step up is special in my books. Most, if not all, of them are going to improve and build on what they did last year. If a few of them turn out to be one year wonders, that still makes the class good. After Jags fans have struggled through questionable and sometimes horrible drafting, last years class was special

What do you mean Browns team? Like, their team they have? Because if so you’re crazy. If you mean their class, I don’t see it.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 22, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you have seen any regular season you would see why everyone knows Williamson sucks.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’ve seen it. He used to suck. But his pre-season he caught the ball well and proved to be a good deep threat. Not saying the guy is even going to be our third receiver targets wise, but he can still be a good deep threat if he catches the ball like he did last year.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 22, 2010 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Preseason is still preaseason.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

exactly…how our the people at DBN the only ones that seem to understand that training camp fodder is training camp fodder.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats what I said

If he performs like he did last pre-season, he could be a good deep threat. I named him as a potential factor if he stays healthy.

You guys are really just picking things apart to argue. I’ll go along with it as long as you want, but its getting ridiculous.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he performs like he did last pre-season, he could be a good deep threat He performed well in the preseason…so what?

Like I said, what he did in the preseason doesn’t matter…last year OR this year. He has never shown to be anything special in the regular season…he is not the only preseason all star either…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

You used

The term “training camp fodder.” Jaguars have seen plenty of OTA and Training Camp stars(see: Charles Sharon and Chad Owens). But both struggled in pre-season games. Williamson did not, which gives him a greater chance of contributing in the regular season.

Yeah, he could always become a non-factor in the season like Jon Broussard did(except for the Tennessee game in 07).

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess training camp fodder is a phrase I use for any general talk before the season starts or before a guy has proven himself.

Many guys light it up in the preseason but struggle when games count.

Production in the preseason does not always (or even often) translate to production in the regular season.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

The pre-season doesn’t always carry over. In the beginning all I said was he has the potential to be a contributor.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

and I do understand he has the potential, but the way you said it and the language implies that you expect him to be better than just someone who has the potential to contribute

Troy Williamson had a great pre-season, and I named him as a potential factor in our offense.

there is a difference between contributing and being a factor. Josh Cribbs contributed to the receiving corps last year but he definitely was not a factor…now Massaquoi was. There is a large difference between contributing and being a factor. it is the language that throws me off.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

When I say factor

I mean as our deep threat. If he contributes, it would likely be in that area. Deep threats don’t have to have a large number of catches to be a factor. Devery Henderson in New Orleans catches about 3 passes a game, but is a factor that teams have to worry about.

To be clear, I think he can “contribute.” I don’t expect him to be a “factor.” If he does, even better.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 25, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes. I can agree this shows the potential to contribute, but I am not sure at this point if he will be a factor.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 25, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not ready to say Williamson is a savior

I wouldn’t at all be surprised to see him fizzle out. But keep in mind, he missed all last season after hurting himself week 1 last season on his first catch of the season which was a long 30 or 40 yard play. He performed all preseason and at least started the very very beginning of the regular season the same way.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

keep in mind, all he has done is perform in the preseason. We have a backup QB who will likely not make the team who always lights it up in preseason and has some skills…big deal…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Troy Williamson had a great pre-season,

So he has been great in OTAs and minicamp where all ofensive players look good…big deal…I can’t believe the blind optimism some people have because of some solid play this early…This is why most people tune out a lot of training camp fodder. If these things were any sort of indication, our 4th QB, Brett Ratliff would be All Pro because he always does well in stuff like minicamp.

Yeah you can’t judge a draft until three years. But a class that has that many rookies step up is special in my books. Most, if not all, of them are going to improve and build on what they did last year

well, special is a very loose and subjective term, and you can’t have any sort of objective viewpoint about a draft until 3 years later…so you can make a point about the draft, but it has no objectivity in most people’s eyes until 3 years down the road.

If a few of them turn out to be one year wonders, that still makes the class good.

so its okay if a few guys turn out to be one year wonders because they were good for a season? i would rather have guys who gradually improved to be pro bowlers. One year wonders do nothing good for how good a draft class is.

After Jags fans have struggled through questionable and sometimes horrible drafting, last years class was special

See…this is the problem. It is not that it is special in general, but it is special compared to previous drafts because you guys have had a bad front office. Now that is what leads to people not taking your opinion as seriously because they think you are just being an extreme homer.

The browns have had some terrible drafts…but I am not calling this one special because I don’t see a large “miss” anywhere in it. To call it that purely compared to previous drafts would not be objective at all.

What do you mean Browns team? Like, their team they have? Because if so you’re crazy.

So I am crazy to say I would take proven guys like Eric Steinbach, Joe Thomas, Eric Wright, Sheldon Brown, Scott Fujita, DQwell Jackson, Ben Watson, Floyd Womack, David Bowens, Robaire Smith, and Shaun Rogers over the 2009 draft class from the jaguars. if you are willing to take a handful of young players, a couple you admit may be one year wonders, over a whole TEAM of players who have proven to be Legit NFl players, you are crazy.

I would not take our 2009 draft class over yours at this point though, but ours has potential. I would take our 2010 class over yours though.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay

When I say Troy Williamson had a great pre-season, I mean he performed in games, early in games, against the starters of other teams. I’m not saying he is going to be great this year, but he has potential to make an impact.

Fine, I’ll wait your three years to label them special. A class that has every rookie play except one is a special first year class. I don’t know why you are obsessing over this.

When I say the class will still be good even if a few of the guys fizzle out, I’m admitting that it is possible that not all of them build and improve on their rookie seasons. Lets say Jarrett Dilliard washes away and never catches another pass for the Jaguars again. Eugene Monroe, Eben Britton, Mike Thomas, and Zack Miller, however, become recognized players. That still makes the class good.

Yeah, its a special class to us. All Jag fans I know really like the 2009 class. Those that aren’t Jags fans also have to acknowledge we drafted well in 09. That doesn’t cause most people to lose respect for what I say. If it does, you took me wrong. I was more defending Gene Smith from above comments than anything else there. I won’t even say it was a top three class one year later right now. Just saying it was a great draft.

Your deal here doesn’t make any sense. Taking a whole NFL team over a rookie class? How is that logical. You can’t do it obviously, but it also doesn’t do well conversation wise. Of course a team of proven NFL players is going to be better than our class. Didn’t quite understand what you were saying.

 

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

When I say Troy Williamson had a great pre-season, I mean he performed in games, early in games, against the starters of other teams

so what? What evidence is there to show guys that light it up in the preseason end up haing good seasons?

A class that has every rookie play except one is a special first year class

yep. for a first year, it is no question special, but you were saying this draft class was special in general, but there is not yet enough evidence to warrant that.

That still makes the class good.

yes, that would make the class good, but it is nowhere guaranteed that all of those players will end up being good players in 3-4 years…the chances are decent, but there is still a good chance at least one of those guys doesn’t turn into anything great.

Just saying it was a great draft.

and so far, I agree but it seems like some jags fans on here seem to be overreacting because they have had terrible drafts in the past and are just putting this one up on this waaaay high up pedestal…maybe this isn’t what you guys mean, but this is what it comes off as.

Didn’t quite understand what you were saying.

but it started with

I’ll take our 2009 class over any of those teams.

and then I respond (somewhat jokingly because I though I knew what you meant to say)

You know what, I would take the browns team over the Jags 2009 Draft class.

then you said

What do you mean Browns team? Like, their team they have? Because if so you’re crazy. If you mean their class, I don’t see it.

and it is CLEAR you made the distinction between the Jags draft being better than the browns draft and the Jags draft being better than the browns TEAM. and you STILL said you would take your draft over the browns team…

now that it looks foolish because you realized you had a very limited knowledge of how many solid players the browns have, you are backtracking

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

We agree

On the first four, pretty much. We are just going back and forth on the same point.

For the next thing, I’m not sure why you are obsessing over this. I got that you were saying team, yes. I guess that was CLEAR. I think I made it clear that I understood it two of my comments up. I was saying I would take our class over your team, yeah. The Browns were a pretty bad team last year, especially offensively. Joe Thomas is better than Eugene Monroe, we can’t yet judge if Derek Cox is better than Eric Wright, we can’t judge yet if Knighton is better than Shaun Rodgers, Eben Britton is better right now than your right tackle. Mike Thomas and possibly Jarrett Dilliard will end up better than most of your receivers(most likely, we can’t judge it yet of course). Browns don’t have anyone like Zack Miller, and he hasn’t hit his potential yet anyway.

I’ll take my younger class. If we were swapping teams, I’d go with the Jags. If we were swapping class for the Browns, I’d of course go with the Browns. Hope that clarifies for you.

I have to say I have a pretty good knowledge of NFL teams. I know the Browns have solid players. Not trying to backtrack, your scenario was just so strange. I’m not sure why you are so hellbent on proving I don’t know much about the Browns. You obviously don’t know a lot about the Jaguars.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Massoquio is better than Thomas, that is obvious. I don’t see Dilliard being better than Robiskie. Rogers is better than Knighton.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait Judgement

On Thomas. He did really well in the role he was given last year. He could become the second option in our offense this year.

Dilliard and Robiskie are similar players apart from their size and Dilliard has much better jumping ability.

Rodgers is better than Knighton right now, yes.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well Robiskie has better size and is faster

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dilliard

Has a great vert though, and isn’t slow. Robiskie may be faster, but not much. In no way is he a burner.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dillard may have more potential, but he is much farther away from reaching it.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree, I'm not very high on Dilliard

I haven’t seen much from him and at the later part of the regular season he was improving but had an injury.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 26, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am not sure if Thomas will ever be able to play on the outside. Even though he has elite speed, he never seemed to get great separation downfield or make big plays in the passing game. He is small and although he has good leaping ability, it will still hamper him. He also needs to get stronger to beat the press.

Maybe in a few years, but not right now I can’t see him in the outside.

And yes, Knighton in a few years may be better…but you have to consider we are talking about a 24 year old player as opposed to a 31 year old player.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

We agree here

I don’t like Mike Thomas outside either. I love him in slot though. He could be second in targets from the slot, plus he gets gadget type touches and screens.

I like him working underneath and catching the ball in space. The guy is built like a running back, and he ran well last year.

Yeah, we gotta wait on Knighton.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah. I think Thomas would be great in the slot but I think you have to have a legit #1 receiver next to him. if MSM can stay next to him, in a few years he can be that #1 guy. Thomas is great in the welker role, but he is limited because he may only be able to do that.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah
Thomas is great in the welker role, but he is limited because he may only be able to do that.

Yeah, just like Welker.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 25, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes, but its highly unlikely that Thomas, or anyone would put up those kind of stats, purely because Welker is in the best possible situation.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 25, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats a good point

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 26, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

We agree here

I don’t like Mike Thomas outside either. I love him in slot though. He could be second in targets from the slot, plus he gets gadget type touches and screens.

I like him working underneath and catching the ball in space. The guy is built like a running back, and he ran well last year.

Yeah, we gotta wait on Knighton.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really liked Massoquio pre-draft

How did he do last year?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

well he put up about as good of numbers as Thomas, maybe better (34 catches to thomas’ 48 but almost 200 yards more and almost double ypc) with quite possibly the league’s worst QB play…AS A ROOKIE. At least Garrard is usually accurate…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

oe Thomas is better than Eugene Monroe, we can’t yet judge if Derek Cox is better than Eric Wright, we can’t judge yet if Knighton is better than Shaun Rodgers, Eben Britton is better right now than your right tackle. Mike Thomas and possibly Jarrett Dilliard will end up better than most of your receivers(most likely, we can’t judge it yet of course). Browns don’t have anyone like Zack Miller,

how is it not too early to judge Monroe vs. Thomas but too early to judge players at the same position compared to our other players…or is it that its not too early when the guy is a superstar.

At this point Shaun Rogers IS much better than Knighton and Knighton will be lucky if he gets that good. Wright right now IS better than cox and is still young (will turn 25 next month) and has never had anyone next to him to take pressure off of him like Brown or Haden can…I disagree on WRs because WRs have a steep learning curve and Robiskie has a shot at improving. you can’t judge receivers objectively at this point, but MoMass is at least as good as thomas…we don’t have a solid TE? How about Ben Watson, Alex Smith, and Evan Moore and Moore is our Zach Miller. Miller has a bit more speed but Moore is dangerous too, he is an antonio gates type in body…huge with great leaping ability.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think

Eugene can become a top ten tackle in the league, but I don’t see him ever being as good as Joe Thomas. He is really athletic and surprised with his run blocking last year, but Thomas is going to be the best tackle for the next 10 years.

Where did I say you don’t have a solid tight end? I just said the Browns don’t have a player like Zack Miller, and you don’t. Ben Watson is fast and a pretty good receiver as long as it hits him in the chest. Alex Smith was okay as a receiver with Tampa, but isn’t near Miller’s speed or athleticism. Evan Moore is a good H-Back type. His ESPN catch last year was nice(pretty sure that was him). But Miller is literally a wide receiver in a small tight ends body. He may play receiver next year.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely agree on Monroe and if he is a top 10 tackle, thats still great

yes. We do not have the exact mold at TE that Zach Millers is, but if we are talking about a young guy with a similar amount of skills and talent, I would say Evan Moore is that guy, though he is a different style.

You guys do not have a Mohammad Massaquoi but you have a guy who is at least as good (this is coming from a browns fan) in MSM…You don’t have the style, but the similar player in how great they are at the position.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats any team in this league

No, I can’t see teams like the Packers, Vikings (with Favre), Cowboys, Saints, Colts, etc. doing something that makes them only get 5 wins.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty simple scenario for you

Packers: Aaron Rodgers get injured=5 wins
Vikings: Favre doesn’t come back+AP gets injured=5 wins
Cowboys: Romo gets injured=7 wins
Saints: Drew Brees gets injured=5 wins
Colts: Peyton gets injured=4 wins

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Packers…Nope. They would get at least 6, maybe 7. Grant is a great back and there are great weapons and a terrific D.

Vikes: Possibly .500. That defense is stellar and the O-Line can make gerhart look good and rush for 1000 yards

Cowboys, yeah, 7 wins…but I think the cowboys

I could go on, but I will just say this:

When I said things going wrong, I was talking about a few things, not a clusterf*$#…I was more talking about how if Garrard starts throwing a few more INTs, the rookies don’t do much, MJD has a bit of an off year, and the pass rush isn’t there. That is a 5 win scenario and nobody had to get injured for it.

Now if we are talking about an injury to MJD…good luck. Feel lucky if you win a game…The thing with him is you guys have ABSOLUTELY NO backup and the passing game is predicated on building the run first to set up the pass…without the run, there is no O, and the D can even be decent, but you can’t win games without scoring.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha thats what you think

I can honestly say the offense could go on with Rashad Jennings or deji karim

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Were you the same person arguing Jones Drew is the best RB in the league?

He is your whole offense and he can’t be replaced by two 7th round nobody’s.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

We can struggle through

keyword struggle. Its not like we’re going to lay down and die.

I also have a feeling like you want us Jaguar fans to just accept every harsh and usually unfair criticism of the team. I mean really when the last time you’ve noted a success of the Jags instead of nick picking a fault or an over zealous homeristic reply.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Without MJD you would have the worst team in the NFL, that’s what I’m saying.

And no, we don’t hate the Jaguars, we just don’t think they are very good.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think you hate the Jaguars

I just think you’re completely ignorant when talking about them.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 23, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ignorance is bliss

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

and being, as TheTealDeal says an “overzealous homer” is also an accurate way to go about talking about a team?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm a homer in the fact that

I believe the Jaguars aren’t as bad as people think. I wouldn’t predict a 16-0 season because i’m not going to ignore the facts nor the positives.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

but at the same time, you do seem to expect unreasonable production from players, especially some of the later round rookies, just because people who played from the ’09 class generally did well.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its not like we’re going to lay down and die.

yeah, because the team would just give up…

I was commenting that the team would have extreme struggles and you respond with

haha thats what you think

and talk about how you will be fine because you have unproven backups.

instead of nick picking a fault or an over zealous homeristic reply.

which is a characteristic of many of the comments from Jags fans I see here.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

opinion

Which is almost as good a fact around here

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

are you saying that what I just said is an opinion? because the fact that your backups haven’t proven ANYTHING is a fact and can be proven.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whats the point

You have your opinion and i have mine and neither will win.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

how is an opinion that the Backups to MJD are unproven?

An opinion would be “The backups to MJD have some talent and I think they could do fairly decently and pick up some of the slack if he gets hurt”

a Fact is “The backups to MJD have proved Nothing in the NFL. Both are from FCS schools. One is a rookie, and one is in his second year but only rushed 39 times last year. Neither of them faced stiff competition (like the NFL) in college and neither has significant experience facing NFL competition”.

You have your opinion, I have my facts. Just because the facts don’t agree with your opinion (and someone else is pointing them out) doesn’t make them not facts!

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

every player on the jags is ridiculously better than people think…at least according to him.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

noo

The main point is that they aren’t as bad as people think either

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, but overrating someone just because others are underrating them just causes more of a mess.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

the fact that you think the offense would be good with a 7th rounder…in his second year…from an FCS school…with Marginal NFL Talent…and ONLY 39 career carries would not be a huge step down from MJD shows how much of a ridiculous homer you jag fans are sometimes.

and Karim, a 6th round rookie…from an FCS school…who only had one good college season…and didn’t even get playing time on a FCS team until his junior year… will also be good?

the step from a Mid Tier FCS conference to the NFL after only having one full season is a lot and it would be ridiculous to expect him to be all that good.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

If our

Running game didn’t completely suck, it would be because of the offensive line. They are good run blockers as a unit.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, they are pretty good run blockers. Overall Football outisders ranks them in the top 15 run blocking Lines, but ranks them average at stopping negative yardage plays and plays on the 2nd level. excellent yardage in the open field, but partially from MJD.

A lot of O-Line stats do depend on the RB too. With an average RB in there, I think you would see the Jags drop out of the top 15 Run Blocking units statistically..so maybe slightly above average.

what happens if you put sucky running backs behind an average O-Line? You get Houston last year, who had a solid Run Blocking line with a terrible Running game…but at least they had an elite QB-WR tandem…Without that, I don’t see them winning a lot of games, which is the same scenario for the Jags without MJD.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

We could

Finish 32nd in rushing if Drew went down. Easily. Our backs don’t have experience, like I said. They are a talented group however. They could suck, or they could hold it down enough to at least keep it respectable. Only way to find out would have to happen for real, which I pray doesn’t, at least while those two are so young

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

. They are a talented group however

Not really. Name one RB group they are more talented than.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

This

Is mostly on opinion, because they are so unproven. When I say talented I mean talented. They are athletes who do a lot of things well.

You could argue our guys, without experience, are more talented backups wise than Green Bay, St. Louis, Cleveland, etc.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, I’m talking about if Jennings and Karim were your starters who would they be better than.

And plus I’d take Hardesty and James Davis over those two.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hardesty is as unproven as Karim

Though I do like Hardesty.

I’d rather have them than Steve Slaton, Ryan Moats, Lendale White, just of the top of my head

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hardesty is as unproven as Karim

not really…technically at an NFL level yes, but Hardesty performed well playing in the SEC against some of the stiffest college competition whereas Karim faced teams that were middle of the road FCS schools. the difference in level of competition is huge and at least Hardesty has shown he can perform well against a level of competition in the same realm as the NFL…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

True but

Technically not at the NFL level.

Yet.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 24, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes, if you truly want to be technical…both are unproven.

However, I do consider an FCS guy more unproven than a guy who produced in the SEC

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah i could agree with that

FCS players are also less known than SEC, PAC-10 etc players

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 24, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

being known is irrelevant. this isn’t known vs. unknown…it is proven vs. unproven. Neither Karim nor Jennings has proven they can have any sort of consistency in decent production against a very high level of competition. both were from FCS schools from Midlevel FCS conferences…

OVC and MVC are not the CAA…its been 13 years since either has had a FCS championship (back when Jim Tressel was creating a Dynasty at YSU)…

but back to the point, the competition level between OVC/MVC and the SEC is like Jumping from AA to the MLB in baseball…those elite, talented few can do it but most can’t succeed…at least right away.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some players slip through the cracks

because they are unknown commodities. They are called Gems

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 26, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but its a longshot that either one of these guys are those “gems”. its entirely possible but the odds are against them.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 26, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Steve Slaton alone is much better than Karim and Jennings. He had a good rookie year but then they tried making him a player that he is not; an everydown RB.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 24, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

So he's a complementary back

and the other two are unproven complementary backs, who in my opinion have more upside

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 24, 2010 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

What gives them more upside?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 25, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

We've seen the peak

when it comes to Steve Slaton and I don’t think he will repeat his good year.

Whereas our rookies has not seen their peak and have the possibility to go higher in their peak.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 26, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

How do you know that’s his peak?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 26, 2010 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you know it that isn't his peak?

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 26, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said that?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 27, 2010 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

You implied it by saying what if it isn't

his peak.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 27, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

the point is, What EVIDENCE is there it IS his peak.

All TRSS said is what evidence is there he has hit his peak. You are asking TRSS to prove that he hasn’t hit his peak. you can’t prove a negative…its just a logical fallacy.

the only evidence I can see that it is his peak is the fact that he didn’t improve his 2nd season in the league (even though he was injured).

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 27, 2010 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

terrible logic. you are asking to disprove a negative (also known as the negative proof fallacy).

I cannot even believe this logic that not even a 3rd grader would use.

-You make a blanket statement as fact and do not back it up with evidence (he hit his peak)

-TRSS questioned what proof you have (how do you know he is at his peak)

-then, you point out how TRSS must prove you, and by extension your argument false (how do you know it isn’t his peak).

this is great logic…if you want to prove something that has no evidence.

-“I believe unicorns exist and are secretly hiding under the ocean? How can I prove it? Disprove it! Prove they don’t exist and don’t live on the ocean floor”

-“I believe manbearpig is real. Can you prove he doesn’t?”

See, trying to prove something with this logic doesn’t work, unless you want to try to attempt to prove something ridiculous. Just because something can’t be directly disproven, does not make it valid or make it exist.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 27, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess they are somewhat talented for backups, but I still think there are groups of backups that are much more talented in the league. These guys really are Marginal NFL players at this point.

yes, they could be respectable (respectable meaning at least 4.0 ypc and not in the top 5 worst rushing offenses) but it is not a likely scenario. Its not about whats possible but what is the most likely scenario given the facts and evidence in front of you, and at this point I don’t see any evidence to say that being respectable is that likely of a scenario…the evidence points much more to worst running Offense…I would say the RBs behind MJD are worse than the RBs were last year in SD or Houston (talent wise).

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

What

Packers rely on Aaron Rodgers more than you realize. Their offensive line is horrible, though they did draft Bulaga to address that. If Rodgers goes down, I don’t see Matt Flynn winning any more than five games.

Grant is a great back and there are great weapons and a terrific D.

Not sure how you call Ryan Grant a great back. He is a pretty good starting running back who benefits from Rodgers throwing 4,000 yards. Pretty average numbers for a starter. In my mind there are only three great backs in the league: CJ2K, Adrian Peterson and MJD.

With the Vikings: I’m not a Tavaris Jackson hater, but most are. I like him in a ball control offense that allows him to use his big arm, but he hasn’t been effective in Minnesota’s west coast scheme. And we both know that offense wouldn’t be anything without Peterson and a backup QB.

I understand what you are saying about bad things. But if all of that you are saying happens I consider that more of a clusterf*$k than one guy getting injured, a much more likely scenario.

MJD is a huge part of our offense and team, but with our receiver talent I think we could get by. Rashad Jennings improved enough last year, and Deji Karim, so far, is looking pretty good. Our offense would take a blow, but there isn’t no backup.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 22, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

MJD is a huge part of our offense and team, but with our receiver talent I think we could get by. Rashad Jennings improved enough last year, and Deji Karim, so far, is looking pretty good. Our offense would take a blow, but there isn’t no backup.

Jennings and Karim would be by far the worst RB group in the NFL.

Earlier in your post you say MJD is as good as Johnson and AD but then you say he is replaceable. You can’t have it both ways.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said

Our offense will take a blow, a major one. MJD isn’t replaceable.

And what, you disagree that he is a top three running back?

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 22, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I say he is in the second tier. He isn’t as good as Johnson or Peterson

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would say the backs in the 2nd tier would be Steven Jackson, MJD, AND MAYBE Rice and DeAngelo

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just my opinion

But I don’t think CJ2K will run for 2K again. He’ll be a great back for a while barring injury, and his speed is unmatched at his position, but I don’t see him improving his seasonal yardage further.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea but he is still better than MJD.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 23, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

is that based on statistics

or the Jaguars offensive scheme (or sometimes lack of one)

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stats + watching their games

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 24, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea but he is still better than MJD.

His speed is unmatched. But MJD is a much better blocker(not saying CJ is bad, but MJD is the best pass blocking running back in the league) and better pure receiver. I know CJ does damage out of the backfield and release passes, but MJD literally lines up at wideout sometimes and catches the ball downfield.

Not saying MJD is better, but they really are on about the same level.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

but MJD is the best pass blocking running back in the league

I would have to disagree…He is definitely one of the better ones, but I would still rank Marion Barber, addai, and Clinton Portis when healthy…plus the Edge in his prime. Forsett is probably about as good of a back blocking too…He is definitely good, but its maybe a stretch to call “best”…but definitely better than CJ (who is maybe just average)

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats cool

Comes down to opinion. But the past four years I’ve never seen Drew miss a block and lay plenty of linebackers out.

If not the best, definitely top three. Barber, Drew and Addai.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 25, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I disagree on him being top 3, but I would most likely say top 5…

In general, we do agree he is definitely good.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 25, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

you seem to really be contradicting yourself. you say you guys will be okay with unproven backups, then say that MJD isn’t replacable and is All Pro.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

He isn't

Replaceable, and our running game would really struggle, but it wouldn’t be last in the league because we still have a good run blocking offensive line.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like I said above, the stats show its an above average offensive line, but isn’t terribly good…and the Line also benefits statistically from blocking for MJD.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I consider that more of a clusterf*$k than one guy getting injured, a much more likely scenario.

A: how is a few guys playing slightly worse than before more of a Clusterf*$K than one guy getting injured?

I am talking about a few more INTs for Garrard which would put his QB rating in the high 70s (like 78-79) instead of the low 80s…

How is the Rookies not doing much a Stretch? Most of them are Mid-Late rounders and a lot from Smaller schools. Alualu and Smith could have an impact, but its not likely since not often do DTs have a large impact their rookie year (and just because Knighton did, doesn’t mean they are guaranteed to)

I am not talking about MJD being bad, but not having as good of a season…I am talking still 1000 yards but not him carrying the Offense as much…Its entirely possible…I dunno if you know this, but last year was his first year as a full time starter…

The pass rush not being there is in fact a likely scenario since it happened LAST YEAR>

but there isn’t no backup.

obviously there is a backup…teams have to keep a certain amount of RB on their roster. HOWEVER, when it comes to backup RBs, very few teams have as little experience and talent backing up their RB.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bro

I think its more likely for one guy to get injured than all of those things you described playing out. The offense should continue to pick up with the offensive line and receiver experience. Not saying Garrard can’t have a worse year, but I’d bet he has a better one. All things are lining up for him, unless he just fails.

Yeah, on paper our backups are weak. If Jones-Drew went down for an extended period of time the running game would plummet. Experience is definitely low for our two backup true runningbacks, but we have to wait for the season to start to judge their talent. Pretty sure Jones-Drew was an underrated back coming out too, had a big impact his first year.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think its more likely for one guy to get injured than all of those things you described playing out.

so its more likely for a guy with no injury to get a freak injury than things that have happened before (like Garrard being Mediocre, no pass rush, rookie DTs not making an impact) to happen?

This isn’t some far fetched scenario…this is a couple of little things going wrong.

Which is more likely, a freak injury to a QB or slightly worse play out of your QB, and RB, with the addition of Kampman not coming back healthy from the injury?

That would lead to that sort of scenario which is not far fetched (considering a: Kampan is past 30 b: So is garrard and he isn’t anything special c: this is MJDs first year as the feature, every down back) compared to a freak injury.

Pretty sure Jones-Drew was an underrated back coming out too, had a big impact his first year.

yeah, so are you implying that we should expect great things out of these guys too? MJD came from the PAC-10 while these guys come from FCS schools and have little experience. Yes, we have to wait for these guys, but lets not have heightened expectations just because we need to wait.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I think an ACL, MCL, PCL, shoulder injury, broken throwing arm is more likely than those three happening. Not saying they can’t, but all three have opposite things going for them. Garrard should improve with the improvement of the offensive line and receivers. The pass rush should improve with Knighton in his second year, Kampman is better than anyone we had at right end last year, even slowed down. We also have Reggie Hayward back incase Kampman tanks. Derrick Harvey should do better with someone better than a traffic cone at the other end, and if AluAlu can passrush in his first year thats a bonus. Even if Jones-Drew has a down year, he is still gonna score a lot of touchdowns because of the redzone touches he gets.

Playing level really doesn’t matter. You find players where you find players. For the third time this thread, I’m not over hyping. They may be great players for the Jaguars. Not saying they are going to be, especially not in their rookie years. Could, but probably not. We need to wait.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Playing level really doesn’t matter. You find players where you find players

but name me a player at RB, taken from an FCS school, that had an impact in their first couple years. It just doesn’t happen. Counting on a guy from that kind of school to surprise people like MJD did is somewhat ludicrous so the comparison should just not have been made. they could be good players eventually but ludicrous comparisons like that hurt credibility of arguments…

plus the knock on MJD was not Skills, Production, Competition, or Intangibles, but his height. That was the thing that kept him down (no pun intended).

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I said they could be great players for the Jaguars. Probably not in Deji’s rookie year. I agree, its really unlikely.

Who knows why Karim didn’t play at a higher level college. Maybe he didn’t have his grades together out of highschool, or maybe his height hurt him in the recruiting game. For the record he is the same height as MJD.

But yes, he still played against lower level competition at two FCS schools.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record he is the same height as MJD.

I think thats the 2nd time you have tried to compare the two but MJD is just on another level. Karim is not a bad player, but not at all the player MJD was coming out (even if you disregard competition)

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Drew is sweet. I was just using that as an example of maybe why he played on a lower level.

But thats just a possible scenario. If the player has good enough production, he can play anywhere he wants. Michael Dyer going to Auburn next year is only 5’8". War Eagle

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 25, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually

They’re not. Sorry, they’re just not. The Jags will probably have a better record this year, but that’s due to experience and team cohesiveness, not talent. Obviously I’m biased because I’m a Lions fan, as you are as a Jags fan, but we are more talented, we’re just very young. I promise you, in a couple years the Lions will be fucking the league up. For real.

by motown313 on Jun 21, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

well…I think denver is going to stink this year…so not that relevant IMO.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Better than Denver?

Really? we had the 15th ranked O while u guys were 18 even with the “NFL’s most complete back,” and we only had 2 games with a 100 yard rusher. We also had the 7th ranked D while you had the 23rd!

I mean, c’mon if your gonna take a stab at someone elses team at least back it up with something. I guess will just see opening day

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 16, 2010 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just believe that Denver was an average team last season who hasn’t gotten better this offseason.

Losing Mike Nolan’s a big factor. Marshall, regardless of how much you hate him, is a top 5 WR. Thomas and Tebow won’t have any impact this season….if at all (although I loved their picks of Walton and Decker….really like Decker actually). Elvis is unhappy, who knows if he gets run out of town. Clady’s hurt. The offense doesn’t really have anyone that scares you. Dawkins and Bailey are getting up there in age. Williams at the NT is a question mark.

 I’d be a bit surprised if they won more than 5 games.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 17, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Havent gotten better?

I tend to disagree. WR is really the only position we have regressed at. We went to a very below average DL last year to a good one this year. Orton is in his second year in what Casey Wiegmann called the toughest O he’s ever learned. Orton also has a history of improving every year as a starter. The secondary has great vets in front and good youths behind in case of injury and ready for the future. Nolan is not as big of a factor as you think. Look at my response at the bottom of this page, it explains why.

Elvis is not unhappy, not sure where you heard that but it is completely false. Reports say the deal should be done before the season, and possibly before training camp. Clady’s hurt, but reports from Dove Valley say he should be ready for the opener, against the worst pass rushing team in the league (will allow him to ease himself back to form), so until that report is proven false, I’ll believe it. Even if he is gone for a while, it will hurt, but it wont be the apocolypse as Ryan Harris could easily slide over and be effective on the blindside.

Offense has noone to scare? No offense, but I dont really care if anyone on our O scares you, our O has actually won more games the less of a factor BMarsh was. Williams may be a question mark at NT, but Fields did a decent job last year so if williams is hurt, I’m not too worried. Dawkins and Bailey, yea heard that last year, they heard u 2, yet they both went to the pro bowl.

5 games? well at least thats an improvement from last year. What was your prediction last year? 0-2 wins? Lets see how close you are this year. Seriously, the only people who are doom and gloom about Denver are people who either do not follow the Broncos closely or are Mike Klis, beat writer for the Post.

For the record, put me at 8-9 wins this season. I think it’ll be tough for them to make the playoffs, but by no means should they be in this conversation.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

When Marshall wasn’t a huge factor, he at least forced double teams.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 17, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Point taken

but if Gaffney builds on his 213 yard performance v KC, Royal returns to form, and Decker and/or Thomas step up, I think the loss of BMarsh will be the equivalent to the loss of Cutler.

I understand what you are saying, but as a Denver fan I heard these same doomsday predicitions when Cutler departed, and at least he was a QB. Now were talking about a possesion WR saying he was our entire team?

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 17, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possesion receiver? That’s cute. He is still a top 5 receiver no matter what you call him.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 17, 2010 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uhmm... No

Ask ejruiz, one of MHR’s prominent authors. I believe he posted it here on why Marshal is not a top 10 WR.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 18, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

so if THIS and THIS and THIS happen, then it might not be that bad? that is banking on a lot.

Gaffney is not a #1 WR and if he was gonna be one, he would have ben already.

Royal was somewhat of a one trick pony. He has elite speed and was able to break free and get open when defenses double teamed Marshall. Even with the double team last year, he regressed because teams ACTUALLY focused on him somewhat and accounted for him. plus, they played press against him and he got dominated on the LOS.

Its hard to count on a rookie WR for a lot since they have one of the biggest positional learning curves to the NFL. Plus, Bey Bey was considered extremely raw, especially areas (like route running) that have large learning curves into the NFL.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gaffney is not a #1 WR and if he was gonna be one, he would have ben already.

Such a true statement.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 21, 2010 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

so they have a #2, a Slot guy who is a pure speed, downfield guy and can’t beat the press, and a rookie who is big and has some speed but is a terrible route runner.

So basically, they have at best Nate Burleson, Donte Stallworth (not at his best, just average stallworth) and Maurice Stovall…stovall is a good comparison to Bey Bey…big with speed size. good blocker, solid hands, but not a good route runner or playmaker.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not a good playmaker? Now I know your full of it!

Please watch some GA tech games for the love of GOD. Thats all that kid did when he touched the ball, as shown with a 25 YPC!!!!

You can say it was an option O, but that proves my point further! He didnt have a true throwing QB and still amassed great numbers by anyones standard. Maurice Stovall is actually quite a terrible example, and Im an ND fan.

But again, I dont think the Broncos success hinges on him. They have a solid and deep WR corps, and the only way to take advantage of that is to spread the ball around and make everyone accountable. If they can do that, BMarsh will not be missed as much, and it will (hopefully) end stupid dinky passes to BMarsh where over half the time we dont even get a first down.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maurice Stovall is actually quite a terrible example, and Im an ND fan.

Exactly what I meant to say.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I meant to put that in qoutes, not marked out.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep..you completely avoid the point that they have no one that will scare a D or consistently get open and instead decide to point out how one comparison isn’t valid.

Point being, even if Bey Bey is a decent slot guy, you have a #2 WR, and another slot guy who can’t beat the press. There is no one on that team who has consistent hands or can get open consistently. You can’t put everyone in the slot, but Royal and Gaffney are much more effective there and likely so will be Bey Bey.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am talking about purely this year. I don’t see him as being a first or second option in a passing offense at this point…granted i don’t see royal as that either but he has more experience and I would rather throw to him at this point than Bey Bey.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Bey Bey makes stride in camp (ie: no hold out, improvement in all around game)

He could be the #1 or 2 option. He is not as raw as you and Mel Kiper think. IGil Brandt has said he thought he shouldve gone top 20, and could very well make an impact. My point is your opinion, despite what you think, could be quite wrong. First you compare him to Stovall, then say he is a slot player, but only for his rookie year? You also called Ryan Harris pedestrian? I’m sorry, but I seriously disagree with your opinion and at this point I think we should leave it at agree to disagree, cuz this is going no where.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

My point is your opinion, despite what you think, could be quite wrong.

and your opinion is equally as likely as being wrong…so lets just stick with the facts.

-Even when he ran routes at GT, he wasn’t very good or polished

-Even the best rookie route runners have a steep learning curve to the NFL and often don’t produce their first year.

-When you are doing 7 on 7 drills with no contact in minicamp, everyone looks good running routes because they run fairly straightforward ones and there is no contact. Minicamp fodder has to be taken with a major grain of salt, especially on offense.

First you compare him to Stovall, then say he is a slot player, but only for his rookie year?

Yeah, I don’t think he will play as much on the outside as in the slot. I may be wrong. However, I think out of all the broncos receivers, he is the most natural outside of the slot.

You also called Ryan Harris pedestrian?

what I mean by that is that He would be league average for a starter. League average is something like Jason Peters, or LJ Shelton when he was with the Dolphins, or Ross Verba with the browns…a guy that isn’t going to hurt you but isn’t that amazing.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldnt say Bey Bey's route running was sloppy

really didnt see enough of it to make sucha statement

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I did watch a handful of games and it looked sloppy…plus many reports other places have said the same (just confirming what I saw).

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I mean he ran 3 routes in college

a curl, a streak, and bubble screens. I dont think they were sloppy when I saw them, kinda hard to run em sloppy anyway

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 22, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

kinda true about how its hard to run them sloppy, but still…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

still what?

I really didnt see route running I’d call “sloppy.” Some streaks he tailed a little but he did hav an option QB throwing deep to him, so I imagine he adjusted his route to benefit his QB. Obviously it worked because the two had a good repertoire. But again that was only some of them, not too many where I’d say its a problem.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why put Bey Bey in the slot? He is huge.

I would put him on the outside to take advantage of him being a deep threat.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

My thoughts exactly

And he is strong as well, so I dont see the press being a huge problem for him

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he can beat the press…I just though he would be their third option which is often the slot guy…but I do feel he is better on the outside.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

You think Welker's the 3rd option in NE?

Royal wil take the slot but he can very well be the 1st option more often than not

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 22, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

which is often the slot guy

Did I say that the slot guy is ALWAYS the third option? No I said often. England has a slot guy as the second option but most offenses can’t survive like that…plus most offenses don’t have Brady and Moss.

I don’t see Royal at this point as a first option on most teams in the NFL. He just doesn’t get open enough.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know you said often

But who was the OC who used Welker correctly and helped him unleash his potential? Thats why I used that example. McD did that, and I dont see why he wont do it again.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

McD did that, and I dont see why he wont do it again.

come on…seriously…Welker was in the PERFECT situation to succeed. It is ridiculous to compare the 2010 broncos to the 2007 Patriots…A few reasons.

a) Tom Brady

b) Randy Moss

c) Powerful Running Game

Wes Welker had a future HOF QB throwing to him. I like orton, but Orton can’t even carry Brady’s jockstrap.

Randy Moss constantly drew double teams, yet he was still great. However, those double teams opened up the offense for welker to get open. There is NO ONE on that team who can draw defenders like Moss…Not even Marshall could have done it that well.

Finally, the Pats were excellent at pounding it out when needed and keeping safeties and LBs on their toes. They had a good running game and better O-Line than Denver.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like Stovall, but that is a bad comparison to Bey Bey.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

In size and skils, though i think Bey Bey will be probably better.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not this and this and this

You think the Pats SB winning teams had what you call a “#1 WR,” the most misused statement by NFL fans?

Gaffney is good, not great. Royal is good, can be great, but not likely. There might not be a “#1 WR” (not like your team has one either) but if Orton spreads the ball around as he did the first half of the season, this O should be fine. In most of our wins Marshall was not as important as you think.

The one win I can honestly say he made great plays was the Giants game, and we ran all over them anyway. His best game was against the Colts and it was clear although his stats were helped, our O wasnt. We just moved the ball about 3-5 yards a catch.

Not counting on a rookie WR. Actually think our run game will do more, as Buck is back, Moreno is fresh (and has a full year in a system he can now grasp) and the OL is bulked up.

Im sorry we dont have your “#1 WR” but plenty have teams have done fine without it (as evident by your Jets).

And who are you that you know everything about the Broncos? How many games have you watched? Cuz its clear you and I have not been watching the same games. Royal was less of a factor because Orton stared down BMarsh all day. Royal was not dominated. Even Orton and McD said that there werent enough plays drawn up for him and Orton didnt have a connection with him.

Bey Bey might seem raw, but his biggest knock, route running, seems to look pretty good so far in minicamps. Although I know it probably isnt fully true until training camp/preseason, Im not as worried about it as I first was.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

When I wrote this, I saw your picture and thought you were a Jets fan, now I can just see your helplessly in love with Braylon Edwards. You are seriously confused

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow really? I have a picture of braylon MISSING A CATCH…I think it is pretty clear by the picture that it is braylon edwards making a bad play and it pleases me everytime he does that in a jets uniform…

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess no one here knows what a dropped catch feels like or why someone would have a picture of him dropping a pass.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

You think the Pats SB winning teams had what you call a "#1 WR," the most misused statement by NFL fans?

I have a few other questions:

Is the Denver O-Line as good as the Pats great line back then?

Is their Defense as good or even close to being as good?

Did Kyle Orton suddenly become Tom Brady?

Plus, I would take their WRs/TEs over Denver’s

And who are you that you know everything about the Broncos?

I guess since i only watched 6 or so games of them last year, i have no reason to talk because I know nothing…plus I am not a fan of them so I have no basis to talk.

Royal was less of a factor because Orton stared down BMarsh all day.

yes, that was a factor…so was the fact that he isn’t particularly good at creating separation without using his speed, and so is his struggles at beating press coverage. He could be elite but he needs to become a better route runner and needs to get bigger and more physical to beat the press…or he will just end up being donte stallworth.

route running, seems to look pretty good so far in minicamps

but most players look good in route running in minicamps…everyone on offense looks at least pretty good…so I take everything there from a grain of salt.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are somethings that look better in minicamp

and you can either route run or you cant, even if it just is in minicamp. And what people dont realize is that Bey Bey never ran the routes in games, but he has said he ran different routes in practice. Granted You’d be more comfortable if he ran it in games, but this notion people have that route running is like a foreign language to Bey Bey is ill conceived

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one said route running was a foreign language to him…at least no one truly trying to make an intelligent argument. there is a difference between that and needing a lot of work and polish on his route running. I still think you have to wait and see on this, because if Training camp is any sign, Brian Robiskie is going to have an 1,000 yard season.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Route running is definitly something you can evaluate in minicamp

And if he’s looking good so far, and keep improving, thats great right? I mean, it goes from a weakness to no weakness and we got ourselves a player

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 22, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats great right?

yeah. its nice to see improvement and its a good sign, but I have seen guys who ran decent routes in minicamp but didn’t run them at all as well when it came to game time.

I mean, it goes from a weakness to no weakness and we got ourselves a player

I think its a large stretch to say the least, that because Bey Bey has looked solid with route running in Minicamp, it is no longer a weakness.

Why does everyone seem to get so excited over minicamp? it happens every year and most of minicamp fodder like this doesn’t mean anything…but people still do it.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, have you though of being a politician?

You can manipulate quotes with the best of them. I said IF Bey Bey keeps improving on route running in training camp and through the pre season, it might not a weakness anymore, thats what I said. Im not basing anything on minicamp, Im just saying if the progress Bey Bey has reportedly made continues when it counts (training camp and preseason) then his route running might not be a weakness

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im just saying if the progress Bey Bey has reportedly made continues when it counts (training camp and preseason) Regular Season

the Regular season is when it counts. plenty of guys look good in TC and in Pre Season but can’t put it together in the regular season…too bad TC and PS don’t count…for most analysis of players and statistically.

yeah, it might not be a weakness even if he keeps the improvement going in the regular season, but it still has a strong likelihood to be. even if he improves, that will not automatically make it not a weakness. I see the chances of him totally making it not a weakness just in this year slim, though I do think its pretty likely he may improve.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

We went to a very below average DL last year to a good one this year.

average at best for any objective viewer.

-you have a banged up, past his prime NT (Jamal Williams) who is maybe above average at his position at this point
-A rotational 3-4 DE who is a marginal starter at best but mostly a career backup past 30 (Bannan)
-An occasional starter at 3-4 DE who can make a decent impact but isn’t anything better than an average starter (Jarvis Green)

but it wont be the apocolypse as Ryan Harris could easily slide over and be effective on the blindside.

define “effective”…is it not completely sucking, then yes…is it giving similar production to the clady, then absolutely not. Clady is elite and although Harris at LT may be better than several starters in the league, he is by no means anything above pedestrian at the position.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Banged up?

NO! Williams was fully healed by week 9, but SD made the choice to put him on the IR week 2.

Yes, he has an injury history, but as of now he’s full go, and has been so for quite some time

Why all this hate on Harris? What do you have against this guy? What do you actually know about him that you keep making these statements?

Harris was actually projected to be a first rounder, but then got hurt his senior year. Shanny drafted him in the 3rd round (absolute steal), but he also got hurt his rookie year. He bounced back his sophmore year and won the RT job from Chris Kuper, which led him to slide to a more comfortable position at RG. He, and that entire OL, had an awesome year in both the run and pass. Then, Again in 09, he suffered a serious toe injury, and although it sounds minor, it is not. He tried to come back against KC but could not finish the game, and ended the year on the IR.

The one true knock you can say is he is injury prone, and that is true. But as long as he is healthy he is much more than a “pedestrian” LT. Again, he’s not Clady, but if we do have to shift Harris to LT, which reports say probably wont happen, I wouldnt be worried with the Left as much as the right, as Zane Beadles, although a good rookie, might be forced to play RT, when reports say he is much better suited for OG in the pros.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

es, he has an injury history, but as of now he’s full go

but he is also in his mid 30s and even before the injury was fading pretty fast

Why all this hate on Harris? What do you have against this guy?

I have nothing against him. i think he could be a capable starter, but it seem like you think he is some all pro player and that they won’t miss a step between him and clady. I don’t see that, though I see a pretty solid player, though Pedestrian might not have been a good word.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont agree with that

There is this new crusade against age in the NFL. I understand it partially, if its blamed correctly. For example: Its quite obvioius Flozell Adams showed his age, so to say his age is an issue is well found. But to say a guy like BDawk or Darren Sharper has an age issue is false. Nothing about their game suggests their age is a negative.

Harris I continue to say is not an all pro player, but is very good. I will say this for the last time. If he moves over to the left, I’ll be more worried about the right. Harris is a proven OT, albeit on the right side, and if he move and we dont have Clady we will have an unproven guy on the right more likely than not. He is good in pass pro, and I don’t think it will be night and day IF CLADY IS GONE!

Another factor you refuse to consider. Clady is scheduled to return by the season opener. You can doubt it if you want, but that is what the sources closest to Denver say so I’ll believe it till its proven false.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is this new crusade against age in the NFL. I understand it partially, if its blamed correctly. For example: Its quite obvioius Flozell Adams showed his age, so to say his age is an issue is well found. But to say a guy like BDawk or Darren Sharper has an age issue is false. Nothing about their game suggests their age is a negative.

I was NOT talking about Dawkins or Sharper. Safeties usually age quicker than other positions and show their age but these guys are Iron men on the field.

all I was saying is that there had already been a significant decline in the level of play of Jamal Williams even before the injury. Before the injury he was a good to very good starter at NT, but not at all pro bowl caliber anymore. You have to consider the fact that he just tore his ACL at a pretty old age for a football player, so i think he’ll still be solid, but nothing amazing.

Harris is a proven OT, albeit on the right side

Yep…on the right side which is a whole different monster than on the left side. The thing is, when guys don’t have the skills to play LT, they are bounced to RT, then inside. Harris physically has average at best skills to play LT (and that may be a stretch) but he can still give some decent play…however, if clady is gone more than a few games, it definitely could hurt the team.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know you didnt say them, I was using them as an example of how saying age isnt always negative

I seriously feel Wiliams play has not deteriorated as much as you believe.

Harris, I mean c’mon it doesnt end with you. you seriously do not read what I write. you feel you can never be wrong, so whats the point of talking to you?

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

you may feel that way, but what I have seen from him is that he is not the player he was in 2007…The players and coaches in the league must agree because he didn’t make the pro bowl in 2008 and wasn’t all pro in 2007…

Harris, I mean c’mon it doesnt end with you. you seriously do not read what I write

well…you try to bring Harris into every conversation…do you seriously have this big of a man crush?

I have never said he is a bad player…please find where I say that. I just am pointing out there WILL be a noticeable dropoff between clady and him.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not saying there wont

what Im saying tho is it wont be a problem, or at least as much as you think

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 22, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I can see how you think there will be less of a problem, but anytime you lose an elite player at a position, it will be a problem.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

There we go

finally we agree on something, somewhat. Obviously we wontget the same production but we’ll have at worst decent protection there. But still you fail to acknowledge the fact that all reports coming from Denver say he will be back in the preseason

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

And maybe he will. I heard he would miss time in the regular season but I have not kept up with the issue…and if he is back in time and 100% ready for week 1, this is not at all an issue.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

What is your definition of a good DL?

Seriously? Granted Green and Bannan were backups from their old teams, they played for teams with very deep DL’s and received plenty of playing time. Actually, I believe Green did start in NE after Seymour left (not 100% sure though)

Like Harris, Williams I feel will be fine as long as he is healthy. Yes he might be old, but you were probably one of those guys who said BDawk and Champ were too old werent you? And what did they do?: Pro-bowl?!?!?!

The DL, our weakness from last year, is so improved our starters from last year are now our backups and rotational guys. Maybe we dont have a Wilfork or Ngata on our line, but it is most definitly improved and should help against the run. Our D, I can honestly say, is much better, and thats a good feeling when they were 7th in the league, 3rd against the pass in this modern passing NFL.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

My definition of a good DL is someone who can significantly impact games or make plays. I don’t see that.

Jarvis green is a decent starter and has nice skills, but isn’t very consistent and even when he started, he just didn’t seem to make plays…basically an underachiever who is average at best against the run.

Bannan is a decent player against the run and is a nice, smart, high effort player. However, he doesn’t have good physical skills and just doesn’t make many plays when given time, especially when rushing the passer which is his weakness.

you were probably one of those guys who said BDawk and Champ were too old werent you?

wow…you got me…I criticize all broncos players…/sarc…I have always been a fan of those guys.

Williams will be a fine starter if healthy, but he is not going to singlehandedly turn that line into a good line.

The DL, our weakness from last year, is so improved our starters from last year are now our backups and rotational guys

that is like a Jacksonville fan saying that they have improved their pass rush because the guys that started last year are now backups. The guys that were starting last year weren’t good. All you have really are backups who lack a major characteristic to help them become a guy who can make some plays with any sort of consistency. Just because you went from bad starters to slightly below average or average starters, doesn’t mean you have good starters…maybe in comparison to before, but not good overall.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

But the difference between us and JAX

is that we have proven guys on or DL, while they have rookies from small schools and a player who is rehabbing an injury that can take 2 full years to come back 100% from

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

they have rookies from small schools and a guy coming off a major injury.

the Broncos have a couple rotational D-Lineman and a player who was once good but is old and coming off an injury.

Your line is improved, but its still not good…that was the main point (which you seemed to have missed). Just because a unit improves from being bad, doesn’t make them good..

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

According to you

this is all according to you, and its simple not as much fact as you think.

And to say our DL was bad is not a good assesment at all. It was a bunch of no names that performed very admirably, and I’d say they played about close to average. But of course, since you dont agree with that its wrong right?

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow…you have gotten snippy…at least I am trying to keep my head on here.

this is all according to you, and its simple not as much fact as you think.

Fact: Broncos were not very good at stopping the run up the middle

Fact: Broncos ranked 30th on D for runs left of center (behind LG, LT, the responsibility of the RDE)

Fact: The broncos ranked 27th on D for runs right of Center.

Fact: The Broncos were not able to stop teams in short yardage situations and were also not effective behind the LOS.

I do not believe Green and Bannan are enough to bring those 27th and 30th even into the top 20

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Big problem last year was

not enough depth. didnt get a good rotation on the DL, and led to the DL wearing down. Talent wasnt as big of a deal as lack of depth, which led to being winded.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

which i can see. Maybe they can improve to being middle of the road, but maybe not. It remains to be seen, but they definitely did not perform well, which in the grand scheme of things is much more important than talent…just ask Jamarcus…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Again, they werent as bad as you think

How do you think Doom got so many one on ones? There job in our D is to eat blocks, not get penetration. If they hold their ground, the LB’s make the tackle, thats how our D is designed. I feel the DL did an OK job at that for the most part, and really had trouble with it down the stretch because they were worn down

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 22, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

There job in our D is to eat blocks, not get penetration.

Its also to push the pile which stats showed they struggled at doing and they also struggled at times at opening lanes by eating blocks.

For their talent level, i have to give them credit, but the DL still wasn’t that great.

How do you think Doom got so many one on ones?

How often did he get one on ones at the end of the season? I didn’t see it that often. in ‘08 he had 5 sacks and at the beginning of the season, offenses weren’t keying on him much and weren’t atempting to double him that much. Then he got 10 sacks in 5 games and all of a sudden, teams had to pay attention to him. Once offenses started to recognize him after that, he struggled a bit more…and he had 7 sacks in 10 games. Still a factor, but not by as much.

If teams don’t try to double team a guy, then how is it a credit to the DL when the guy gets one on one matchups?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Push the pile,

not as important as holding their ground and allowing the LB’s to make the tackle. Again, I’m not sure what your defense does with their DL, but Denver’s just holds ground and allows others to make plays. Maybe that was because the coaching staff realized the lack of talent, and gave them a job they could realisticly do. One of the biggest problems against the run as well was our OLB’s, if not pass rushing, must maintain the edge. They really struggled with that down the stretch as well which led to huge off tackle runs. So this doesnt fall on just the DL.

Doom had a down year in 08, but so did everyone else on the D that year. I know once he came to show how elite his skills were, he got more double teams. But still he did manage 17 sacks and most of those I have seen are one on ones, sometimes with an RB or TE chip.

You fail to see the point of a 3-4 DL, at least in our scheme. They draw blocks, so if that means the threats on the outside get one on ones, they are doing their job. Why did they give Doom one on ones, with inferior tackles? I dont know, and I dont think Tony Romo or Brady Quinn do either. Maybe teams were actually threatened our DL could flush the pocket on one on ones.

And you prove my point, yes he had more sacks in the beginning of the year because the DL was fresher then, and later in the year they wore down. Thats why the 3 big additions will be huge because they will be able to keep our DL fresher and hopefully allow our DL to perform like they did the first 6 games and not the last 10.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

and most of those I have seen are one on ones, sometimes with an RB or TE chip.

but this does not inherently mean that it is a great credit to the DL. like you admitted, he got less attention when he was getting his first 10 sacks, and one missed assignment by an O-Lineman can cause a sack…plus there were maybe some plays where they didn’t really account for him as much as they should have.

I do see the point of a DL in a 3-4. I do not think its about penetration but controlling the LOS and if possible pushing it back

And you prove my point, yes he had more sacks in the beginning of the year because the DL was fresher then, and later in the year they wore down.

can we prove that it was because the DL was fresher? or was that merely just a correlation…There is no Causal evidence that I saw when I watched his sacks on tape to suggest that it was because of a fresh DL as opposed to a worn down one. I did see a bit more evidence that it was because Offenses sent more blockers his way (though not true causal evidence for that either)

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Deal!

You think the Broncos won’t win five? Put a FanPost where your mouth is. TheRealSlimShady and I have a little gentlemen’s wager between us on the Broncos 2010 win total. Even though he said they’d win 5-6 games, he was budging on taking the bet, so I set the line at 7.5 wins and took the over. I’d be more than happy to offer you the same deal. All the loser has to do is post a FanPost announcing their failure and whatnot. If I lose, then be prepared for something over-the-top from me! It’s all in good fun and I think it’s better than going back and forth with ever more hostile comments in threads about what amounts to opinions without absolute truth. So, TexansDC, you in?

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 18, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I will promote said FanPost to let the humiliation flow.

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 19, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks!

I was a lot more confident last year (when all my Broncos had to do was beat out teams like the Rams and Bears for the bets, plus the Seahawks and Browns for giggles) but I still think Denver’s got an 8-8 team that is more likely to be better than that mark than worse…

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 19, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Deal....

I’m in. All in good fun, right?

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 20, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would be in for the under…I think 7 is the max with this team.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m in

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don't have a defense

period

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Taker?

What’s your guess for the Broncos record in 2010?

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 19, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mediocre, like the Jaguars of last year

I would agree with slimshady about the under 7 wins.

Orton is like Garrard, he’s okay but he isn’t very good. Tim Tebow may play later but he’s a rookie so he might be Alex Smith or successful

We’ve talked about Marshall and i think its still a lose more than a gain. Eddie Royals is alright but I don’t think he’s Marshall good or will command a double team.

Champ Bailey is up there in age and I think his play will tamper off.

What should make me think elsewise? And unless convinved elsewise, i’m a taker

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sweet!

So, I’ll write you in on our little wager, then. Man, I’m going to have to make a FanPost for this just to get everything down!

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 19, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alright

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW I really hope the Broncos do good if Quinn plays.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 20, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

To everything except for David G. I’ll say average to above average on that one ;)

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 15, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

when did they get one of the best LB corps in the NFL? this was news to everyone outside of jacksonville (including pundits on TV, analysts, and some scouts). Just because everyone in jacksonville thinks they have the best LBs doesn’t mean they do…plus the secondary is terrible and there will be no pass rush. teams will destroy you passing…and you play against the pass happy texans and Colts twice a year, and other good passing offenses (eagles, cowboys, giants, chargers, etc…)

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Look at Pro Football Focus’ rankings.

Daryl Smith is one of the 3 best LBers in the NFL, while Kirk Morrision and Justin Durant are both above average/good.

Big Cat Country, The #1 Jaguars blog on the net

by Jonathan Loesche on Jun 16, 2010 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pro football focus sucks.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Daryl Smith?

ehhh… i don’t think so lol

by vitzeng on Jun 16, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh, hell yeah

Smith is one of the most underrated players in the league.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 16, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, one of the most underrated

but not way in HELL he is a top 3 linebacker in the league. That is absolutely nuts. I know you guys are homer Jaguars fans, but come on be realistic.

by Yankees10 on Jun 16, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Top 3

In the league is a really broad statement. I don’t agree with in the league. But he is one of the top three 4-3 linebackers in the AFC.

Like I said, he is probably the most underrated defensive player in the league.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 17, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can agree with 4-3 in the AFC

but in the entire league including 3-4 and NFC, then no way top 3.

by Yankees10 on Jun 17, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Four comments up I was just saying he is really underrated, not top 3 in league.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 17, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I thought you agreed that he was a top 3 in the league

by Yankees10 on Jun 17, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

that I could live with…(which would put him maybe 6-8th in the NFL in just the 4-3 which is where I would maybe put him).

but just because a guy is underrated like you say, overrating him doesn’t help much.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

and then a guy gets underrated and talked about as being this underrated guy to the point he becomes overrated…it happens ALL THE TIME in draft talk. Daryl smith is a good to very good starter, though some may underrate him I agree. However I think he has been considered underrated (and then rated higher because of it) for so long that soon he may be overrated.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I see what you are saying

But that doesn’t apply to Daryl Smith at all. ESPN reporters probably don’t even know who he is.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

ESPN reporters probably don’t even know who he is.

wow…thats a stretch.

Smith isn’t some unknown guy. People do know about him but he doesn’t always get enough credit. However recently, he has been touted in some media sources as a great underrated player.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe top 3 on the Jaguars

or maybe top 3 in the AFC South

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 16, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see there LBs being one of the best groups.

The O-line definitely isn’t one of the best. Monroe should be pretty good, but no one else really stands out there.

Garrard is below average.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

And a secondary

welcome to the modern NFL Jags

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 16, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't let your pre-existing opinions cloud the facts

If you have been paying attention and aren’t just spewing opinion, you would see the Jaguars have a plethora of new players of defense. After all they spent 4 draft picks on lineman. If you tend to think those picks were grevious reaches then look at the proven people: Aaron Kampman and company. IF you add all these, you’ll see a better pass rush. However, i admit a weak secondary besides Derek Cox and possibly Rashean Mathis at CB.

  Signed,
Someone who doesn’t listen to pre-existing opinions

P.S. You’ll know our players by the end of the Jaguars win, Week 1.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uhmm, no

Seriously who knows how well Kampman returns from a severe injury late last season. Even then, he has to bounce back from a down year (albeit, in a bad scheme for him). Kampman could be good, but relying on rookies and pointing to that as the reason ur team will improve is not a good strategy.

Yes, ur secondary is still weak. You’ve done a good job to improve your DL, but a lot of those guys are rookies and Terrence Knighton is only a 2nd year player. Kampman may not be the same player. For the future, yes, your DL looks good, but I refuse to change my “pre-existing opinion” because you drafted 4 DL and signed one who is nursing a bad bad injury. And I will not change my opinion on your secondary until Mathis bounces back to form or there is someone else worthy to change my “pre-existing opinion”

And your making a regular season prediction before training camp? Everyone, Nostradamus is reborn!

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 19, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am, just like the knee-jerk reaction that Denver is better than Jax

I wish you could explain how you are because I can’t see it. My question, which is better, A Rookie or Derrick Harvey. If the answer is a rookie then thats an upgrade albeit small or big. If you add if that question to all the weaknesses, then you’re seeing upgrades. There was not a big turnover this year and logic would say that rookies get better after 1 year of playing, so last years rookies should maintain or excel their excellance.

 Look on Kampman and how he’s been doing lately. He’s ahead of schedule to say the least. You can get over his kind of injury. Relying on rookies along with his is not a negative thing. Rookies make big impacts and despite the popular, espn driven opinion that our Draft class is full of reaches, if you remember last year, people were questioning our GM. Our GM delivered and until he proves elsewise, you can believe he knows what he’s doing and will do it again.

I ask you to specifically tell me how the Broncos are better.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

A Rookie or Derrick Harvey. If the answer is a rookie then thats an upgrade albeit small or big.

well, harvey sucks and I don’t see Hart or Lane overtaking him for a job on the end…

Relying on rookies along with his is not a negative thing

…unless you are relying on two 5th round DEs to come out of FCS schools and make an impact…or to expect your rookie DTs to have a large impact on the pass rush, especially one who isn’t really a pass rusher…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I expect big things from Harvey this year

If you watch the tape, he battled double teams almost every single play last year. Mostly because whichever guy was opposite him was so terrible that teams didn’t have to worry at all about isolating that player against a tackle. Harvey has been very strong against the run, but that never did much because every team ran the other way.

So give him someone even halfway decent that will at least demand respect and I think we’ll finally see what we actually have in Harvey. Maybe it’s not much, but at the very least he’s a very strong run defender even against doubles.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 21, 2010 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Harvey could explode this year with help inside and at the opposite end spot.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

you may be right. I haven’t watched much tape on him…maybe Kampman can help but we’ll see.

I still don’t expect big things from him, but I think he could surprise.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alualu isn't a pass rusher?

That’s news to me pal. That’s what he was drafted for.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 21, 2010 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

He isn’t a pure pass rusher. He is a DT which isn’t a premium pass rushing position. DT can make an impact, but not at all like a DE. Plus nothing about Alualu excites me. He looks nice on tape at times and I like his motor, but I am not sold on him being a standout NFL player.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please don't take offense to this

But I’ll trust Gene Smith’s scouting skills over yours.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 21, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, if the Jaguars made a certain move, it’s gotta be right. That’s why they have been so great recently.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Slim

Seriously? Not sure how you can make an argument that Gene is a bad GM/Scout

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, there isn’t enough evidence to say yes or no on whether he is a bad GM, and it is not clear exactly what players in the Jags Organization he scouted…so lets just say he is neither good nor bad…at least for right now.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

So far

The evidence says he is a good GM.

Fair enough. Two more great drafts from him and it shouldn’t be debatable. Guess we just have to wait.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 22, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am not arguing evidence so far…I am arguing that there is not ENOUGH evidence. Yes, if he is able to have 2 more great drafts (and 3 years later they look great) and build a great team, then he will definitely be a great GM in my opinion. He is definitely off to a solid start.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Word

Thats all I’m sayin.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 23, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

He took over as GM last year

The only draft class you can judge him on is 2009 and so far he’s off to a great start. Do your homework before you talk bruh.

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes…but its too early too call him even a success…we gotta wait at least a bit but its not lookin bad.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 22, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

no. I agree the draft class is great so far, but its waaay to early to judge in any objectivity.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

In scenarios like this,

you just have to bring up the example of Bush and M Williams. after the 06 season ppl said the Texans made the wrong pick, 2 years later ppl said they made the right pick, and Bush was a bust, now they are saying both teams made good picks and that Bush is living up to his draft status again.

Point is we don’t know about draft picks until we know

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 23, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 24, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bush still isn’t living up to the #2 selection. Mario is having a much bigger impact.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 24, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

He hasn't proven

To be worth the #2 selection, but it has to be said that what Bush provides when healthy can be invaluable to a team.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 24, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

So he makes 1 promising draft and everything he does HAS TO be the right move?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

“I’ll trust Gene Smith’s scouting skills over yours.”

“He took over as GM last year….and so far he’s off the a great start.”

You’re stretching a bit, don’t you think?

Follow me on Twitter

by Adam Stites on Jun 22, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well from now on, anytime you make a comment about a pick being less than great, I’ll say I trust _____’s scouting over yours.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t take offense…but scouting is somewhat irrelevant to the point. DTs are not solely drafted to rush the passer…that is the job of the DE. Rushing the passer is a secondary priority for a DT after all the things they do against the run.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

You still havent answered how your team is improved

Im not saying you draft class is bad, never said that. What I am saying is going into a season and throwing a rookie into the fire is a bad policy to have in the NFL. My opinion on rookies is let them play once they’ve earned it, because either they could not be ready or they could then take their job for granted because its handed to them. Also, by making them compete for PT, you make them strive to become better, and not be content. Finally, rookies tend to make plenty of mental mistakes, which on the DL can mean a TD or a big play.

Your GM delivered. Delivered what? 2 young unproven OT’s? I mean, you dont see me going around saying McD delivered, and I can honestly say he has done more in this league than Gene Smith.

How have the Broncos improved? Well, its pretty much all over this page, I’ve typed it about a hundred times, and ejruiz has done it almost as much as I, but to humor you, I’ll do it again:

1: Addition by subtraction: Pretty obvious what I mean here. For the 2nd year in a row, we have done this, and for the 2nd year in a row, people are predicting the worst for us. I fully believe the NFL is as far from the NBA (superstar league) as possible. This is a team game, and by getting rid of cancers, our team is much improved. We will prove the doubters wrong once again.

2: OL: We couldnt run the ball last half of the year. Partially due to losing RT Harris and also because we were too weak up front. We added a lot of beef up front, and have also injected depth as well. There will be a lot of competition on the OL, which should lead to improvement and the best players playing.

3: DL: Now we might have not have perenial pro bowlers on this line, but we have added guys seasoned in the 3-4 and guys who are at least good. Up in years? yes but we have young depth in the rotation who will gain experience for the future. Also, like the OL, have added a lot of beef as well, which should help plenty.

4: WR’s: Did we lose BMarsh? yes. but is our WR corps deeper? Most definitly. I know you probably dont believe me, and thats fine. But remember this name: Matthew Willis.

QB: Orton has improved his numbers every year he has started in the NFL, and now that he is in the 2nd year in what has been called the hardest O to learn, I dont see that stopping. He’s not great, but he is pretty good. He really just needs to spread the ball around more, like he did in the beginning of the year

Finally, RB should be improved as well. Moreno goes into his full first year with a full grasp of the O, Buck returs healthy (for how long IDK) and we have some options for the #3 RB, much more than last year (Lamonr Jordan)

Let me make tisclear. I dont think this team is great, I think they are pretty good. I am near EJ’s prediciton for the Broncos, with 7-9 wins being my expected range. however, I am leaning more towards 9 than 7. I honestly dont expect better from your team. Now that I have explained why I feel the Broncos have improved (even though we boast a statistically better O and D then you) can you explain to me why you think the Jags have improved and improved over my Broncos?

BTW, one question: do you honestly believe Garrard deserved the pro-bowl? I honestly think HELL NO, and although I dont like him as a QB, I think Orton was a much better QB than Garrard, and deserved the pro bowl more.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kampman may be ahead of shcedule

but ACL’s are real bad. Look at Shawne Merriman. 2 years later he still isnt what he once was. Most doctors will tell you its 2 years before your 100% with a torn ACL

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 21, 2010 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kampman may be good but the problem with the logic is considering him being good a GUARANTEE…he is far from it…he is older, and coming off a down season and a major injury. he could give solid production, but he could just as easily have a clunker season.

For a team that had a desperate need at pass rusher, 5th round is pretty late to address the issue of a pure pass rusher…especially when addressing it with 2 FCS guys and those guys don’t often pan out. They got Alualu who could make an impact, and Smith who isn’t much of a pass rusher…so what did they do really?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

They also had to go to overtime at home

against the Rams last year. So maybe the most inconsistent team? The most underproductive?

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Jun 16, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

For sure, we'd be in the running for Most Inconstistent

but i’d sat the reason being would be on significant roster turnover that had many rookies playing as starters.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted for Buffalo but just remembered that Cleveland’s schedule is tough(if I remember it correctly) and they are probably going to have Jake Delhomme as there QB to start the season.

by The Legend on Jun 15, 2010 8:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I am surprised no one has mentioned the Buc's

Lead organizer of the annual 7 round live mock draft at MtD and Moderator

by TheAngelsColts on Jun 15, 2010 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

they're probably in the top 10 picks

but they’re probably along the lines of Detroit. They could surprise. I don’t see how they could be the worst, at least not the worst instead of Cleveland, Buffalo or St. Louis. Freeman seems like something, at that’s more then those 3 teams can say (at least for now with Bradford, tho I think he stinks anyway)

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

You seem to think all the Rookie QB's stink. lol

Lead organizer of the annual 7 round live mock draft at MtD and Moderator

by TheAngelsColts on Jun 15, 2010 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

not really

just Bradford.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

But what about Clausen?

Lead organizer of the annual 7 round live mock draft at MtD and Moderator

by TheAngelsColts on Jun 15, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

what about him?

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is far from guaranteed.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Moore has to really suck (as in Delhomme last year bad)

I don’t think he’d do that facing the 2nd easiest schedule (Delhomme had 2nd toughest last year)

by vitzeng on Jun 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bradford is garbage

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 15, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

freeman showed flashes but he is still extremely raw and will have to adjust even more in the offseason now that there is a season of data out on him…

freeman showd much less than stafford or sanchez and I am not sold on either one of those two as being at least solid players in the future.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 16, 2010 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I actually think the Bucs will be decent this year. Not good, but certainly not the worst. I think they had a good draft and are building their team from the Lines out. Of course, they might perform better if they spent a few pennies here and there…

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Jun 16, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

As far as the worst team

I know I’ll catch some flak, but how about Seattle. I don’t think Carroll’s return to the NFL will work out, plus they’re either too young, too old, or just not very good at most spots.

Big Cat Country, The #1 Jaguars blog on the net

by Jonathan Loesche on Jun 15, 2010 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

You won’t catch any flak from me. They had a good draft, but I have no problems seeing that team as a total disaster.

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Jun 16, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I Agree!

I said it above, the Seahawks are my sleeper pick for the #1 pick.

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 16, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they are in a funny place

The team needs direction, and whether Caroll gives them that or not is just unforseeable (much like debating if Kolb will be a winning NFL QB, not enough to go on at this point). They have pieces here and there. They don’t have much along the D-line, which hurts. The best players are getting pretty old (Housh, Hasslebeck) or too young (Allen, Okung, Curry). But they could surprise one week and flop the next. I think this season will be lots of ups and downs, though not all downs. I would think hitting the floor wouldn’t be terrible at all though. They draft Locker and they would have a solid young foundation to build on.

by einman77 on Jun 17, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

the rams will repeat

       And until we get busier with our off-season we shall become a dynasty in this regard. Our draft picking has sucked pretty hard for too long now and it appears to be contagious from one regime to the next.

by dbcouver on Jun 15, 2010 11:09 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

carolina also has the 2nd easiest schedule in the NFL i believe

i voted bills, but i’m thinking it could just as easily be the browns… being a carolina fan, i know that delhomme likes aiming at #1 receivers and needs a solid o-line/RB for support. I would say that the browns don’t really have either

by vitzeng on Jun 15, 2010 11:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I think the Browns have at least a solid O-line with Thomas, Steinbach, Mack

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

lol, to specify

when i meant either, i meant “o-line/RB” or “receivers”

i grouped o-line/RB because RBs can’t do anything without a good o-line and a good o-line is negated if there is no one to throw to or hand off to

by vitzeng on Jun 16, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Harrison and Hardesty could be solid.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hardesty will be an upgrade

because there was no one’s shoes to fill there.

by einman77 on Jun 17, 2010 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

i'm not counting really counting rookies in this

or else I would have given more credit to the bills with CJ Spiller

by vitzeng on Jun 18, 2010 3:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

but what can CJ spiller do between the tackles or in cold weather?

Even if you have spiller, their line is still one of the worst in the league…

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

I think Buffalo was the worst possible place for Spiller to be drafted to.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah. He needs a warm weather place and buffalo needs a grinder and some Nice O-Lineman. I guess for now it was the best option at RB for them because Spiller is a guy who can make plays outside the tackles and doesn’t rely as much on good blocking at times…However he is a bad fit long term.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

and the browns O-Line can make even jamal lewis last year at times look decent…There are definitely major question marks, but Harrison definitely showed promise, and hardesty is a sleeper kinda guy that was passed on by a lot of teams because of injuries but is a legitimate feature back.

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't even care about the voting options the main concern is that the Chiefs are not on the list :D

I don’t think we are a top 15 team in the league but i believe there’s only one way that we finish last and it can be said about most teams. If our QB just absolutely plays horribly and i mean 65 passer rating bad then we could pick first but outside of that i like our team getting 7 wins from our weak schedule.

You can draft defensive line to stop a player at the line.
You can draft linebackers to stop a player 3-4 yards down the field.
Or you can draft a safety to tackle him 15 yards down the field.
I'll take the first two any day.

by ChiefsfanJon on Jun 16, 2010 1:45 AM EDT reply actions  

It wont be Denver

The D is much more talented, the O and D are going into their 2nd years in what have been called the hardest systems to learn. They also have a much easier schedule then last year.

Granted, there not world beaters, and they may have trouble making the playoffs, but I dont think they are or should be in the discussion for worst team

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 16, 2010 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

They lost their D coordinator though.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 16, 2010 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nolan, albeit helped

but games such as Colts, Chiefs round 2, Eagles, Nolan had a huge hand in those losses. Yes, he was good for the most part, but people have christened him a DC god after one year. I would contend to say without McD, Nolan would have not had the same success at all. Nolan came in here wanting to bring his 4-3/3-4 hybrid debacle that failed miserably in SF, and McD stopped him and gave him the guidelines to a D he wanted. I believe Nolan strayed from what McD wanted in the aforementioned games, as the first three series in the Colts game, Nolan kept helplessly all out blitzing the best QB in the NFL, which caused our D to let up 3 straight TD’s. After that, reports said McD was furious, told him to blitz less and use the 3-3-5 against Manning, and voila! in 3 quarters of play, Manning and Co. had 1 TD and 3 INTS.

Now that part I believe to be true, as I have read reports that Nolan lost his job in Denver because of that game. Nolan was good, but I like the new guy Wink because he will blitz, but when the time is right, and he wont try to bring in 3-4 4-3 hybrids with incorrect personnel. McD believe it or not has some NFL coaching experience on the D side of the ball, and although I think his O playcalling responsibilities take him away from his D more than he’d like, I think he has more of a hand in the D than people give him credit for.

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 16, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could you expand this to all 32 teams then everyone could use this as the norm for their mock drafts?

Do two polls best team in the NFL and worst team in the NFL then average the two scores by subtracting the “worst” score from the best. The higher the score, the better the team. If you can do 32 options in a poll, then do 4 polls splitting up the AFC and NFC.

by rws591 on Jun 17, 2010 10:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Interesting Concept...

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 17, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ditto.

"The never-ending search for a truth never told."

"God I'm excited for those two to fail miserably." - SBNation writer Andrew Sharp on Josh McDaniels and Tim Tebow.

Quitter's People United Member #18

by Tempestuous Binary on Jun 18, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

even though opinion is a big factor, it would be interesting

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you include two teams who've won the Super Bowl in the last ten years?

Tampa and St. Louis shouldn’t be on the list. Neither should Carolina.

by CelticPride on Jun 17, 2010 1:24 PM EDT reply actions  

This is about what they’re going to be in 2010, not a lifetime achievement thing. If they shouldn’t be on the list, why did Tampa and St. Louis have such bad records in 2009?

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 17, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then it's a stupid headline

“What is the worst team in the NFL?”

And I’m just feeling pissy in general right now – so don’t mind me.

by CelticPride on Jun 18, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would feel pissy too

if my team blew a 13 point lead in game 7 of the NBA finals, lol. GO LAKERS!!!!!

by Yankees10 on Jun 18, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bandwagon much?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 20, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't say it

when you switch teams at a moments notice cuz they pick the latest ND QB

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 20, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why would I even be such a big ND fan if I was just a bandwaggoner?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

to your credit, at least you have a logical system behind it

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 21, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats fine but this is the NFL

Being a ND fan in the NFL is being a bandwagoner

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 21, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, not really. That is your opinion.

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 21, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just an opinion

It seems lately opinions have been touted as facts

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 22, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

huh? what about your homerism touted as a fact?

I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.

by bross09 on Jun 23, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

ridiculous

I have to say you’re the biggest homer in this thread, and it’s not even close. You try and state, as undeniable truth, that every move made by the Broncos was absolutely right and should work out perfectly for the team. Before I read your over involved arguments, I could give a crap about the Broncos. Now I just want them to suck so can eat your words and maybe learn to look at things a little more objectively.

by einman77 on Jun 27, 2010 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah CelticGuy, that just sounds really foolish/dumb

You don’t think the Rams should be included on the list for worst team of 2010 because they won a Superbowl in 1999, even though they only won ONE game last year? That sounds extremely ignorant.

by motown313 on Jun 17, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re right. This site only writes about things in the past. This site encompasses every year of the NFL, ever. We’re launching an off-shoot AFL site soon!

Mocking the Draft: Talking NFL Draft all year.

by Dan Kadar on Jun 18, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

yea..

I got the Bucs and Raiders in the Bowl this year too. Good to know a Celtic fan agrees with me…

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 19, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Bears hands down.

I can’t see more than one win.

McShay, Todd McShay you hear me boy? It's me TJ and I'm coming for your damn job boy! Oh be scared, be very scared McShay.

by tj.hendricks on Jun 19, 2010 12:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Come On, Now!

The Bears will win six, at least, don’t you think?

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 19, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe two

it depends on if Favre comes back as well. I can see us beating Detroit once and maybe, MAYBE Buffalo, other than that who? We’ll beat Detroit at home, lose at Dallas and Green Bay. That starts 1-2. Next four is at Giants, at Carolina, home for Seattle and Washington. I could see 1-6. Seattle depends on Hasselbeck’s health. In November we got Bills in Toronto, home for Minny, at Miami, home for Philly. Buffalo is a toss up to me and if Favre retires I might MIGHT give us the Minny game. Then we finish at Detroit, home for New England, at Minny, home for Jets, at Green Bay.

I see us a 1-15 or 2-14 team maybe 3-13.

Will Peppers upgrade our pass rush? Or pack it in since he got paid? Can Urlacher stay healthy? Does Tommie Harris even care? Our offensive line is still the most horrendous in the league and add to that Jay Cutler in Mike Martz system he very well could throw 30 TDs and 45 INTs. But who is he throwing to? Early reports suggest that Hester and Knox are our starting two then Aromoshodu and Bennett are the 3rd and 4th WRs.

I don’t like it, I can’t see six wins, no way.

I'm just a dude who likes talking to other dudes about other dudes.........in a straight way.

by tj.hendricks on Jun 20, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why the heck did you all not sign Tra Thomas?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 20, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

How

Did Earl Bennett do last year? I only got to watch three Bears games. He had a decent number of receptions and yards. I remember coming out of college everyone labeled him as the perfect number 2 wideout. Good routes, good hands, knew how to get open. Did he flash at all last year?

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Jun 21, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Umm...
We’ll beat Detroit at home

I don’t know about that. All of a sudden our D-line looks like it will absolutely demolish your guys’ O-line. And believe me, I’ve seen Martz’s offense firsthand when he was our OC, and it’s really not impressive, and will probably be even less so when you consider how complex it is and how lacking in the talent department the Bears offense is.

Of course, I am talking about the Lions, and we seem to have a knack for losing games we shouldn’t. But don’t fool yourself, this is NOT the same Lions team you’ve been shitting on for the entirety of Matt Millen’s reign.

by motown313 on Jun 21, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

and we seem to have a knack for losing games we shouldn’t

You all have been favorites?

"Young men, I have no doubt that you're gonna do well today. But I have 1 favor to ask of you... SAVE JIMMY JOHNSON'S ASS FOR ME!" Lou Holtz

by TheRealSlimShady on Jun 22, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course not

we’re talking about the Lions, here. I was referring to games where we had a lead and blew it.

by motown313 on Jun 22, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

If there OL somewhat improves

they shouldnt be in this. Cutler has a quick release and good mobility and still cant even have marginal success with that pop warner line. D they should be OK, O they really need a line for both Forte and Cutler, 2 player who were great in 08 and had trouble in 09, largely due to the lack luster OL

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 19, 2010 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like saying whose team is the worst yet

cuz it’ll enact a bewildered why from those of differing opinions.

But if i had to in this list from best to worst:

Jacksonville,
Detroit,
Carolina,
Cleveland,
Tampa Bay
St. Louis
Tampa Bay
Buffalo

If you want a reason, just ask

Tampa Bay

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Just throwing this out there

But i think a good idea would be if a knowledgeable fan wrote a fanpost explaining why their team will not be the worst team next year would be good for debate. Especially for the teams listed here.

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 19, 2010 3:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I like that

Great idea, of course though no one will ever admit that there team will be the worst or anything close to it lol

by DBroncs1414 on Jun 19, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can fit mine into a comment.

Double Trouble.

Good bye #43. Good luck in Chicago.

by Flowing Willow on Jun 20, 2010 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree even without Peppers

And btw, hows tony Pike doing? He was a favorite of mine as a college football player

"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"

Real fans don’t need a reason.

Gamertag: xXTealNinjaXx

by TheTealDeal on Jun 23, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

So far he's behind all our other guys.

But he missed time because he hadn’t graduated yet. Still, our coaching staff really likes him, they did add him even though they already had Clausen. Personally I think he could lose out to Hunter Cantwell for a rsoter spot.

Good bye #43. Good luck in Chicago.

by Flowing Willow on Jun 30, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

its got to be between the Rams and the Bills

2009 NY Phin PhansFantasy League Champion
2009 Best Regular Season Record in NYPPL.
2010 The Jim Mandich NewsFlash Award Winner.

""It only ends once. Everything that comes before is just progress"

by Patssuck456 on Jun 19, 2010 4:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Mocking the Draft provides detailed information, scouting reports, mock drafts and rumors surrounding the NFL Draft.

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

OVERALL RANKINGS


Site manager

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mockingthedraft_small Dan Kadar

Editors

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

Burnie_small Matthew Fairburn

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Writers

Mtdlogo_small Josh_D

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Small seton hall and steelers

Small KashMoney

Small pick256

Damond_y_maga_small Damond Talbot