Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Colts first round pick: lock to be OL?


Most mocks this year have the Colts picking an offensive tackle like Sherrod, Costanzo or one of a few others.  On the surface this may seem like a slam dunk safe pick and it may be, but I think there are few reasons why it may not be.

First we have to understand what went wrong for the Colts line last year.  Johnson in my opinion is a underrated left tackle and was one of our better linemen in 2010 while never being 100% healthy.  You could definitely do better than Johnson but you could do much worse.  I'm not convinced that any of the tackles in this class could step right in and do a better job in 2011 than him on the blindside.  Kyle DeVan at left guard quietly had a decent year both in pass pro and run blocking.  He was not great but he was consistently adequate and is still developing at 25 years old.  Saturday may no longer be an above average pure blocker but his mind and teamwork with Manning in setting protections gives him great value.  The right side of the line was not quite as effective as the left.  According to Football Outsiders our YPC over the LT was 4.46, 3.65 up the middle and 3.29 over the right tackle.  As you can see our running game got progressively worse towards the right side.  Mike Pollak at right guard is a good technician and is very smart but was simply physically outmatched at guard.  His brain will make him a good replacement for Saturday someday but his guard spot for now needs upgraded.  Ryan Diem has been a solid player for the Colts for while but its a shame that he seems to be finished as a starter.  He got beat consistently by speed rushers and couldn't move well enough in space to be an effective blocker in our zone blocking scheme.  I don't think he will be brought back at his current salary and will be replaced.

Star-divide

From comments made by Polian himself and watching these guys play myself it seems the Colts plan on replacing a guard (Pollak) and a tackle (Diem) with two players already being developed in the system.  UDFA Jeff Linkenbach from Cincinnati seems pegged to be that replacement tackle.  At 6-4 311 and 23 years old he has the frame to work with and is in the propper time of development at 23 to emerge as a solid starter.  He played both LT and RT this year because of injuries to Johnson and Diem and played well.  He locks on well and maintains his blocks in pass protection moving well laterally and even though he isn't a mauler run blocker he stays with blocks and can maneuver defenders away from the play.  I think he could be a substantial upgrade over Diem and has a chance to be a solid RT or good enough LT in the NFL.   

Description from Stampede Blue of what Polian said about Linkenbach and his future:
"Jeff Linkenbach played well against Jets, and Polian can can count on him as a tackle, which is a gigantic
plus'[said Polian]."

At guard the plan is more clear.  From the quote below Polian has already made up his mind that Jaques McClendon will be our starting guard (or center if something happens to Saturday) next year.  At an athletic 6-3 324 and and one of the strongest players anywhere on the roster, he would would be a sure upgrade if his development is up to par after being our fourth round selection from Tennessee in 2011.  If he is as good as Polian thinks he should very well be better than any of the current crop of C/G in this draft during the 2011 season.      
 
Direct Quote about Jaques McClendon from Polian:
"I don't know where he'll end up ultimately.  I think we'll find that out over next spring and training camp but its going to be somewhere as a starter, of that much I'm sure."

Another linemen Polian thinks highly of is Jamie Thomas.  He is listed as both a tackle and a guard and his 6-3 330 frame should allow him to do either.  He is more of a wildcard than Linkenbach and McCLendon but if either of them should fail on the new right side of the line Thomas would be a prime candidate, being in the system for three years now, to fill in as a starter.

Direct quote about Jamie Thomas from Polian:
"[Thomas] is scratching the surface of his potential...hes going to play alot of football for us before its over and he going to play very well."

Description from Stampede Blue of what Polian said on his show about our first round pick:
"Polian says that at pick #22 in the first round, the Colts will not get a ‘stud’ player. He did say, however, that 22 is a good position to move up or done from.  If the Colts take an offensive or defensive lineman, that player will not make impact right away. The players will be like Fili Moala."

Sorry for such a lengthy explanation but I needed to clearly lay out why I think Polian is not going to pick an offensive linemen in the first round in the intent to play him as a starter in 2011.  He likes his internal options as legitimate upgrades on the line and at the same time doesn't like his options in the draft.  As for where he might go I have a few ideas:

Best available pass rusher: Kerrigan would be a good fit because he could become along with Hughes the next tandem of edge pass rushers that the 4-3 Tampa 2 HAS TO HAVE to work.  While he develops behind Freeney and Mathis he could fill the role of 'extra pass rushing free radical lineman' that Raheem Brock filled on passing downs as they are of nearly identical size at around 6-4 270 and can shoot gaps while moving in space.  He could also take Aldon Smith as a 1-2 year developmental pick based on his potential to become an elite pass rusher we would never have access to in normal situations not ever drafting in the top 5-10 picks.  Other than Manning, the Colts rely on pressure from only four down linemen more than anything else so its hard to ever fault a first round pick on an edge rusher.

Best available 1-tech:  Polian could draft what could be the biggest immediate need on the defense in a 1-tech overtackle.  Round one players that would best fit this role would be Paea, Casey and maybe even Bailey.  In this scenario the player drafted would be brought along slowly like Moala and paired with in 2011 with a resigned Antonio Johnson or a FA like Mebane(SEA).

Trading up: Polian mentioned this as an option so maybe they like guys enough even if they don't fit a need like J. Jones, Baldwin, Amukamara, Quinn or someone unexpected to move up and get them.  I find this to be the least likely option.

Trading down:  A bit more likely that trading up would be getting another second and third rounder for our first (proper value?) and coming away with something like Sash or Black in the second, Fua in the third and then two other BPA or project OL along with another project OL in the fourth.


The Colts very well could draft one of the top OL in the first and/or the second but I don't think its as much of a slam dunk that most others do.  How likely do you think at first round OL is and if they don't take one what other directions with that pick should they go?

If it's deemed spam, it gets deleted.

Comment 9 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Don't see Casey or Balley as 1-techs

TAC, a Colts/USC fan thinks Casey might even be best off moving outside as a LE and Bailey would be the 2nd smallest DT on the team next to Eric Foster (who pretty much only plays passing downs the last 2 years).

I can’t see them going for Kerrigan either. Putting another 1st rounder into a DE who won’t start for his first 2 years? (Freeney is signed through 2012 and still playing on an elite level). There isn’t even the potential to get use from him before then as a backup/subpackage player since Hughes should be fully taking over those rolls next season.

Paea on the other hand I see as a very viable alternative to a first round O-lineman. I think the Colts believe the could go into next year with what they have and be a contender, but I expect they’ll look hard into ways to upgrade the OL. The price/pick will just have to be right.

Choke/Clutch is the fetishization of the small sample size.

"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." -Isaac Asimov

by shake n bake on Jan 17, 2011 6:36 PM EST reply actions  

You are right about Casey. I get him and Jenkins mixed up but he is a 2-3 rounder anyways not a first round option. Bailey while lighter than most might be stronger than any of the 2-3 round 1-tech options like Jenkins or Fua while maintaining top notch speed. He wouldn’t be your usual option at 1-tech but if he can use his power to anchor, shed and then make tackles or start pursuit then he could play 1-tech.

I also see Kerrigan as a guy who could be used in different situations than Huges, just like Brock used to be used.

Jason Heyward wins at baseball.

by bbxxj on Jan 17, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I could see them maybe taking a DE if someone they loved was around for them

but not early.

In fact the last time I was playing around with the Draft-Tek sim I had them grab Romeus in the 5th round. I don’t think you can have two 1st round picks sitting behind Pro Bowlers though. That’s just poor resource allocation.

Choke/Clutch is the fetishization of the small sample size.

"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." -Isaac Asimov

by shake n bake on Jan 17, 2011 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

DE

Re: Kerrigan,

I think I mentioned this before, but I am sure the Colts absolutely love Kerrigan. To the extent that I wouldn’t be surprised one bit if he is the top-ranked player on their entire board.

I do think he has potential to contribute, namely in replacing the role of the departing Keyunta Dawson (unrestricted free agent). But as you said, that’s not a starting role barring injury. And teams in the bottom third of the first round are generally looking for starters where needed.

Still, Robert Mathis is entering the last year of his contract and my guess is the Colts let him sign elsewhere after this 2011 season, to be replaced by Jerry Hughes. And I’m all for that. Mathis is a Classic Colt, he’s a future inductee in the Colts’ Ring of Honor, but there’s no way in hell I would pay him a premium DE contract or anything remotely close to it. Especially not when the Colts were fortunate enough to get Hughes last year.

And it slipped my mind Freeney was only signed through 2012, he could be gone in two years.

by project geo on Jan 19, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

very well though out arguement against taking OT...

Indy, NE, and Pittsburg have been the best teams over the last 5-10 yrs. All three have the same achilles heal, OL.
Polian blamed the Oline for the Colt losing the superbowl against the Saints.
The Pats lost against the Jets this year, and the Giants in the superbowl due to the Oline.
Other than rookie Pouncey, the Steelers have ignored their Oline, and it shows with constant pressure on Big Ben.

by durst on Jan 17, 2011 9:00 PM EST reply actions  

I’m not saying we shouldn’t upgrade our line, I’m just saying that the upgrade(s) will come from within.

Jason Heyward wins at baseball.

by bbxxj on Jan 17, 2011 9:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Def. agree as polian basically said it for the G. I think they still need to get an OT.

However I don’t think (polian basically confirmed) that we are going to draft someone and expect them to start right away. Many fans will expect that but I wont be. What I would expect is he would get some play time but just not a ton in first year.

Site Moderator on MockingtheDraft, AnaheimCalling, and Coltzilla.

Lead organizer of the annual 7-round live mock draft at MtD

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2011 2:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Brady had between 3 and 5 seconds to throw on every sack

With that OL, Manning would have at most 5 sacks on the year.

by Ty46 on Jan 18, 2011 6:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I expect the Colts to go left tackle in the first round, they need a starting left tackle

1. Left Tackle

Charlie Johnson is not good enough (despite your attempt to argue the opposite), plus he cannot stay healthy. The Colts kept him through his relatively cheap sixth round contract, but he’s now an unrestricted free agent and now the Colts move on. Having already moved on from Tony Ugoh a few months earlier.

I’ve been thinking it over, and it’s still very early so it’s all very fluid, but I’m thinking Nate Solder as the top-ranked tackle for the Colts. I’d have to say he’s the prospect I want the most, with his athletic ability and the smarts, among other attributes. His issues look to be largely correctable (technique issues, upper body strength).

After Solder, I’m guessing Sherrod, Castonzo, and then maybe Tyron Smith.

I was a little more bullish on Castonzo recently, but I’ve tried to step back and think it over. His performance against Nevada might have been too fresh in my mind and maybe he’s not as athletic as I thought him to be. Plus of all the tackles, he’s very likely to have been exposed to the best coaching. I was a big fan of former BC Eagles center Matt Tennant last year who is very, very similar to Castonzo in many respects, I overlooked his faults then (he went much later than I expected) and wondered if I was doing the same with Castonzo … as I’ve said, it’s all very fluid and I’ve been (re)thinking things.

But that’s why I bumped Derek Sherrod ahead of him in the second spot, for what it’s worth.

I have Tyron Smith as a tentative fourth because, although he has great athletic ability that could very well see him as a Top 15 selection to come teams, I have concerns about his work ethic and the head on his shoulders. He’s a 20-year-old kid who missed the 2010 Emerald Bowl because of academics. He hasn’t played any left tackle. He may come into the Combine around 300 lbs but I wonder if his time at USC didn’t mainly consist of him coasting by on his physical ability. Some players at USC work hard and have the right attitude, but some others don’t (some of which have been termed “dogs” by scouts). I had very similar concerns about Charles Brown last year, although Smith is a better prospect than Brown. Too much of a risky project for the Colts to really consider imo.

I’m hoping Solder reaches the Colts’ pick, because I think they are definitely going to go offensive tackle in the first round.

2. First-Round (or Second-Round) Defensive Tackle?

For all of those Polian quotes you provided, you neglected to include the two most important ones. The first, during the season in I believe one of his Polian Corners, where he basically outright disparaged the play of the offensive tackles and the need to improve there. (See #1 above; also applies to Ryan Diem who will we return to in a bit.) If you want to include the quote about Rodger Saffold as an addendum to this, feel free.

The second, the very most recent quotes/comments by Polian, on the JMV show or whatever it’s called, where he said he was essentially fine with the defense returning next year and his greater aim is on the offense. He also added that they have to look to certain players on the offense with respect to their age, injuries, effectiveness … ie. more fuel to the fire that Polian will make the right move and cut the grossly overpaid, injury-prone Ryan Diem who is not a good enough NFL starting tackle either. There are no cap acceleration concern with releasing Diem, he’s in the last year of his deal and cutting him outright saves the Colts $5.4M that is much, much better off spent elsewhere.

Like say the defensive tackles. Polian’s comments above indicate the Colts aren’t likely to look at DT in the first two rounds, but both Antonio Johnson and Daniel Muir are unrestricted free agents. Presumably, for Polian to feel that way, he thinks he can get one if not both of Mookie and Muir re-signed.

3. Improving the OL from within?

Not sure I see this either. But I do think Polian’s aim is to finally improve the offensive line, especially as they now have contracts off the books, opening up roster spots.

I agree with you that Mike Pollak’s best fit is at center, I think he can be great there, but I think he’s turned into a very good guard. He dealt with injuries his first two years and then this year the Colts’ coaches made the moronic decision to bench him for Jeff Linkenbach (stupid beyond belief). To me he’s the best offensive lineman on the Colts right now. And he could move over to Left Guard if need be.

DeVan I don’t see as the ideal starter, but he’s incredibly value as a back-up who can step in at either guard spot and perhaps even center as well, he’ll go out there and battle to try and get the job done. He’s definitely a keeper in that regard, and maybe a candidate to be the starting center in 2012.

But the Colts need to upgrade their interior run-blocking-wise. Part of it is Jeff Saturday, he was never a road-grader but at times he looks to have declined/diminished to the point where he’s getting dominated physically more than ever. Yet I expect the Colts will give him his last year of his contract, he’s still a good if not great pass-blocker, SB XLVI is in Indy, and the Colts are likely working in at least two if not three new starting lineman this upcoming year already.

McClendon could be the center of the future. The Colts’ website has him listed at 6-3/324, but the Colts’ website is a joke and this is likely yet another example why. At the Tennessee pro day last year, McClendon measured in at 6-2/308. The Colts’ website also lists Jeff Linkenbach as 6-4/311 when he measured in at 6-6.5 in height. Don’t trust the Colts’ website.

Jamey Richard is terrible imo, although unfortunately I expect him to stick around because Polian loves the shit out of him. There’s that Polian comment above about Jaimie Thomas, but really he hasn’t shown anything. Those are two roster spots that could be better used on guards who can upgrade the future offensive line if not the current offensive line too, although if may end up as only one because of Polian/Richard.

All of which is why I’m thinking someone like John Moffitt to the Colts in the second round, especially if the Colts aren’t going defensive tackle/line in the second round. Moffitt steps in at one of the guard spots – I’m thinking of keeping him at left guard next to Nate Solder, that is the position Moffitt has been playing plus it’s looks like a strong combination of run-blocking and pass-blocking. Moffitt obviously gets the pub for his run-blocking (think I saw Gabe Carimi end up on the ground more than him), but I also think he does a good pass-blocking as well. Would prefer to see him lose a few pounds, but he’s an intelligent kid.

So yeah, I’m thinking/hoping for Nate Solder in the first and John Moffitt in the second, which would boost the Colts’ offensive line in a big (literally and figuratively) way. The Colts must improve the offensive line, and if they do that, then they are as serious as any contender in the league.

by project geo on Jan 19, 2011 1:48 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

Mocking the Draft provides detailed information, scouting reports, mock drafts and rumors surrounding the NFL Draft.

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

OVERALL RANKINGS


Site manager

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mockingthedraft_small Dan Kadar

Editors

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

Burnie_small Matthew Fairburn

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Writers

Mtdlogo_small Josh_D

Baby_drinking_becks_small 3k

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Small seton hall and steelers

Small KashMoney

Small pick256

Damond_y_maga_small Damond Talbot