Jeff Fuller NFL Draft prospect notes
Jeff Fuller
6'4, 215 pounds | Wide receiver | Texas A&M
First word: In a conference with wide receivers like Justin Blackmon and Ryan Broyles, Fuller still manages to stick out. He may not put up stats like his Big 12 predecessors, but he projects to the NFL just as well. He's a big target who knows how to get open using his strength and frame.
Fuller really grabbed the attention of talent evaluators against LSU in the Cotton Bowl last season. Against the Tigers' Patrick Peterson, Fuller had a solid game with seven receptions for 83 yards. Statistically it wasn't his best game, but probably his most important of the year. Fuller worked a lot in that game on comeback routes and showed he can quickly find the ball.
As good as he was against Peterson, he was bad against Nebraska's more physical corners. That inconsistency is ultimately the greatest knock on Fuller leading into his senior season. To string together an entire great season, Fuller needs to sharpen his routes and work after the catch better.
Bold statement: Although he's probably not a true No. 1 at the next level, Fuller is one of the 2012 draft's best possession receivers.
Games viewed: (All 2010) Oklahoma State, Arkansas, Nebraska, LSU
6'4, 215 pounds | Wide receiver | Texas A&M
Notes:
• It might not be fair to categorize Fuller as a possession receiver, but that's what he is until he gets better after the catch.
• One of the reasons he returned for his senior season was to refine his route running. Is mostly used on flies, outs and quick comebacks.
• Can flip his hips and turn his head fluidly and quickly to make a play on the ball.
• For a bigger receiver, Fuller struggles at times to get off the line of scrimmage against press coverage.
• Has been knocked for being inconsistent. Finished four games last season with more than 120 yards receiving, but had less than 40 yards in four his last five games.
• Because of his size, Fuller is a good asset in the red zone. He can camp in the corner of the end zone and wait for the ball. Has solid leaping ability, which allows the quarterback to place the ball only where he can get it.
• Fuller has displayed great flashes of ball skills and playmaking ability. He got much better during his junior season at high-pointing the ball, especially working down the sideline.
• May be more of a No. 2 receiver than a No. 1 because he doesn't have top athleticism or playmaking ability after the catch.
6 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree wholeheartedly with your eval Dan. Definitely seems like more of a possession guy than a true #1. Hopefully people don’t see “possession guy” and think less of him. Very few truly #1 WRs and a possession WR is a very valuable asset, both in moving the chains and working the red zone. In fact, my favorite WR ever was Chris Carter, a “possession” WR, and he’ll be in the HoF soon.
I would however, try to temper any “He beat Patrick Peterson” talk. LSU played off coverage and Fuller would run comebacks in front of Peterson and then immediately get tackled. A great offensive strategy to keep Peterson from making plays, but Fuller wasn’t beating Peterson one-on-one or anything. LSU wins it going away 41-24, so it wasn’t a winning strategy either. Here is Mocking the Drafts Game Film from the Cotton Bowl and Nebraska games:
LSU D vs Texas A&M O 2010 Cotton Bowl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eknzU4ibB6k
Nebraska D vs Texas A&M O 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xY3LhP1rWA
Mocking the Draft - Writer
MTD's Prospect Library - http://www.youtube.com/user/JoshMTD
How is his speed?
You mentioned his lack of top athleticism, but is that mostly in speed, agility, leaping ability, strength, etc. or across the board?

by 




















