DT's First Ever Mock Draft on MTD
This is my first Mock Draft here on Mocking the Draft, but I would like to hear your feedback. I think there will be a few moves this offseason that will make the draft a little more interesting. First off, I think the Jets will make a push to sign Peyton Manning, and I believe the Miami Dolphins will go hard after Matt Flynn, so he can reunite with his former coach. With the Browns targeting a runningback early will they get their QB later? What do you think of my first draft? Shed some light....
1. Indianapolis (2-14) – Andrew Luck, QB, Stanford
2. St. Louis (2-14) – Matt Kalil, OT, USC
3. Minnesota (3-13) – Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State
4. Cleveland (4-12) – Trent Richardson, RB, Alabama
5. Tampa Bay (4-12) – Morris Claiborne, CB, LSU
6. Washington (5-11) – Robert Griffin III, QB, Baylor
7. Jacksonville (5-11) - Kendall Wright, WR, Baylor
8. Miami (6-10) – Quinton Coples, DE, UNC
9. Carolina (6-10) – Michael Brockers, DT, LSU
10. Buffalo (6-10) – Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame
11. Kansas City (7-9) – Riley Reiff, OT, Iowa
12. Seattle (7-9) – Brock Osweiler, QB, Arizona State
13. Arizona (8-8) – David DeCastro, OG, Stanford
14. Dallas (8-8) – Dre Kirkpatrick, CB, Alabama
15. Philadelphia (8-8) – Vontaze Burfict, ILB, Arizona State
16. New York Jets (8-8) – Courtney Upshaw, DE/OLB, Alabama
17. Cincinnati - from Oakland (8-8) – Janoris Jenkins, CB, North Alabama
18. San Diego (8-8) – Jonathan Martin, OT, Stanford
19. Chicago (8-8) – Mohamed Sanu, WR, Rutgers
20. Tennessee (9-7) – Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina
21. Cincinnati* (9-7) – Lamar Miller, RB, Miami
22. Cleveland - from Atlanta* (10-6) – Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A&M
23. Detroit* (10-6) – Cordy Glenn, OG, Georgia
24. Pittsburgh* (12-4) – Mike Adams, OT, Ohio State
25. Denver* (8-8) – Luke Kuechly, ILB, Boston College
26. Houston* (10-6) – Dontari Poe, NT, Memphis
27. New England - from New Orleans* (13-3) – Chase Minnifield, CB, Virginia
28. Green Bay* (15-1) – Peter Konz, OC, Wisconsin
29. Baltimore* (12-4) – Donte' Hightower, ILB, Alabama
30. San Francisco* (13-3) - Devon Still, DT, Penn State
31. New England* (13-3) – Mark Barron, S, Alabama
32. New York Giants* (9-7) – Zach Brown, OLB, UNC
191 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jags
I think Wright is a good pick, but definitely not @ 7. Reiff or Coples are better value.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
I knew that was going to be my first comment
Let me explain this a little bit before I get attacked. I have spoke with several NFL scouts that have told me they have Wright higher on their charts then Blackmon. I know the Jags need help at WR but I think this could be the guy that everyone gets shocked by.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:23 PM EST up reply actions
I would not be shocked
but I feel like Gene Smith is going to be like me and realize no WR in the draft this year warrants a top 10 pick.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
I would be fine with Wright
But with the depth of the WR class Coples or Rieff would be my pick. I like the draft overall though. Lots of gutsy picks
SCALP'EM
Jesus is Lord!
by Thunder64 on Feb 15, 2012 9:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think the two best WR’s are Blackmon and Wright, I think it could happen like that
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions
Without a doubt they are, but a top 10 pick is elite. The question is are those 2 elite? Maybe, but I would probably lean towards 2nd round WR right now. If we took Wright I wouldn’t be upset though, as the Jags had to have seen something that warranted that.
SCALP'EM
Jesus is Lord!
by Thunder64 on Feb 15, 2012 10:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If wright has a good combine
We would be more comfortable, I guess. Id take wright
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Problem with our Wide recievers is that they're never wide open and they have trouble receiving the ball...
by TheTealDeal on Feb 16, 2012 7:57 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Yep.
no WR in the draft this year warrants a top 10 pick.
More people will wake up to this.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 10:32 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You both feel that Blackmon is not a top 10 pick?
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
Wait for his 40 time.
He may still go in the top-10, but…
It is what it is
Blackmon/Wright aren't in the class of Green/Jones.
And it’s not a given that a WR goes in the Top 10. In 2006, 2008 and 2010, no receivers went in the Top 10.
Even if you’re the GM of a team with a need at WR, why would you spend a Top 10 pick on a wideout, when similar talent can be had late in the first round or even in the second round?
The thing about Green and Jones is they were without flaws. Every top receiver in this class has a flaw or two. Blackmon? Too slow. Wright? Too short. Floyd? Booze. Jeffery? Work ethic. Sanu? Give me a break.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
hold on now
green and jones had flaws jones has terrible hands and green doesnt have great top end speed. i can see what youre saying with the rest but they werent flawless prospects
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 16, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
Terrible hands?
Come on.
They were both elite and no one questioned their potential. Everyone knew they’d be special. There’s not a guy in this class that fits that description.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
he dropped 8 passes this year
far from elite hands and his hands during his time in alabama were worse than they were last year in the nfl
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 16, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions
terrible might have been a little extreme
but they are BAD
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 16, 2012 9:13 PM EST up reply actions
So just to clarify where you're coming from...
…you think Julio Jones isn’t elite.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions
hes not flawless
and his hands arent elite
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 16, 2012 9:42 PM EST up reply actions
Which of the clowns...
…in this year’s draft would you draft ahead of him?
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions
blackmon....
he was slated higher pre draft until he decided to return most rankings were AJ. then Blackmon and Julio
the only reason julio skyrocketed was because blackmon went back to school and he ran a fast forty. people forget that though and act as if julio was a sure thing from day one
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 16, 2012 9:55 PM EST up reply actions
Okay.
I think you’re wrong. But okay.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 10:15 PM EST up reply actions
There's no such thing as a flawless WR prospect
The closest ones to being flawless were Calvin Johnson & Andre Johnson, & I’m sure they had minor flaws as well
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 16, 2012 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
Fair enough.
But you think anyone in this class compares favorably with Green and Jones?
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions
Unfortunately, there will be WRs taken in the Top 10 because there are teams in the Top 10 that need WRs
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with this, that makes sense, I think the Bills will take a WR as well, I don’t know if it is a good choice, but I could see them doing it.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
I assure you, unless Kalil or Claiborne is there
and maybe even if they are, Blackmon isn’t going past the Panthers lol
Yes please! Blackmon would not make it past the Panthers...
I don’t feel that these guys are top 5 talents, but Blackmon and Wright they could easily be well worth taking near the bottom of the top ten, especially since so many teams have a glaring need. Taking a WR high is very risky, but waiting to take one later has not necessarily helped out the Browns and Jags lately.
"You know the new iPhone? It’s faster, more powerful and smarter. It’s revolutionary. Why can’t the quarterback be like that? Why can’t you be a big, tall, fast, quick, strong, smart, mobile quarterback who’s unstoppable?"
-Cam Newton
by carolinapillpusher on Feb 16, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with that comment as well
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:14 PM EST up reply actions
I take it none of those scouts represented the Vikings organization?
Blackmon at #3…yuck!
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
/stopwastingpicks,vikings
I agree. He’s a huge stretch at #3. Besides, we could take almost a sure thing at LT or we could take a huge risk at WR. Blackmon’s not going to be elite in the NFL. He’s just slow enough. If he can get his 40 closer to 4.4 then we’re talkin’. I’m not one to get mesmerized by 40-times, but when you’re talking ELITE? It’s a deal-breaker.
White Horn Gold Pants
Can't see Griffin falling that far
Especially if a team takes Osweiller that high.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
I really feel that Oswieler is going to shock people. Just my opinion
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions
I do think he's gonna come up on the boards, but not that high
Then again, Christian Ponder got drafted at #12 last year
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
Dude's tape is ugly
He’s not even as developed as Gabbert was when he left school. I’m not saying he won’t get drafted in the 1st, but he looks like more of a 3rd-4th rd value to me.
he is getting talked about for a reason, when you get good training people see what type of QB you are. At 6’8 if he can have decent intangibles he will shock people, and move up
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
He's Derek Anderson.
Or Mallet without Mallet’s arm talent and experience. Watch his game tape and you’ll see a guy who doesn’t put his lower half into his throws, leading to inaccuracy and poor velocity. He’s more athletic than those other big QBs but he doesn’t use his mobility intelligently, IOW he’ll scramble away from pressure but not re-set in the pocket and keep his eyes downfield.
As an ASU fan
I thought it was insane when Oswieler declared, when people said he would be a 2nd round pick, and the thought of him going in the first let alone the top 10 makes me laugh hysterically. I can only hope that Seattle DOES take him, better for my Cardinals lol.
I'm shocked you have both Burfict (15) and Barron (31) going in the first round
I agree with you on Burfict being a 1st rounder (I see him as the next Patrick Willis or Ray Lewis) but everywhere I look everyone has his character issues knocking him out of the 1st round.
With Barron I expect his injury to knock him out of the first round.
First winner of the Golden Rex
Schottenheimer: "46 Left motion right over under bear 24 cat 65 triple left right up down on three"
Sione: "What is the offense doing?"
Rex: "I don’t know, but it won’t be a first down"
I really feel that Burfict is going to impress, and Mark Barron is by far the best safety in this class
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions
It's not character; it's stupidity.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions
I think Burfict has some issues but he is a competitor, he is hungry, have you watched him play? I am really a big fan of his, this kid reminds me of Ray Lewis.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:36 PM EST up reply actions
his issues might be enough to knock him out of the first
Or atleast a little later
Cold Blooded
by Jaggaholic82 on Feb 15, 2012 10:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
His issues could knock him out, but if you look at the first round there are tons of guys that have knocks on them
Janoris Jenkins
Dre Kirkpatrick
Vontaze Burfict
Alston Jeffery
But I wouldn’t mind any of them on my team, except Jeffery
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:49 PM EST up reply actions
I have watched him play.
And his play/athleticism is overrated.
I think Burfict fans haven’t actually watched him play; they’ve only seen his highlights.
Burfict’s play is characterized by disappearing for several series, missing tackles and getting swallowed up by guards. His technique sucks. Plain and simple.
People are in love with comparing him to Ray Lewis, but that’s an insult to Ray Lewis.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 9:54 AM EST up reply actions
I totally agree with you
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
my God....this x 100
"We will not be denied." - Antrel Rolle
by BigBlueIntervention on Feb 16, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
No way the Eagles draft Vontaze Burfict.
If Reid and company finally decide to draft a LB in the 1st rd it will be Luke Kuechly.
by Almightypudster on Feb 17, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
Jets
Fine by me
Oh yes that's right, I'm a Jets fan.
by Bob_The_Friendly_Baker on Feb 15, 2012 9:29 PM EST reply actions
Burfict won't go in the first.
Head case. Can’t bench press. Bad attitude. Dumb penalties.
by TFTribe on Feb 15, 2012 9:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Andre Smith went in the top 10
It’s always silly to me to see such definitive statements
“won’t”. How do we know? That’s why the draft is so fun. It’s crazy.
Burfict is extremely talented and you, me, Dan Kadar, anyone else not involved with the teams won’t have the kind of background checks a N.F.L.team will on Burfict. If they are getting ok information on him he’ll go in the first round
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me." Dudley Field Malone
Editor at nflmocks.com, contributor a newyork.sbnation.com
by Jesse Bartolis on Feb 15, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions
Burfict is special, he is a LBer that will bring fire to a team that needs it. He could be an easy pick when they get on the clock
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
I'm the only Giants fan who still wants him
I agree with you.
I don’t love Burfict for every team though. If I’m a Lions fan and they draft Burfict I might get a bit worried. Too many undisciplined players running around perhaps, but on a team with strong leadership. He could wake up and be special
"I have never in my life learned anything from any man who agreed with me." Dudley Field Malone
Editor at nflmocks.com, contributor a newyork.sbnation.com
by Jesse Bartolis on Feb 15, 2012 10:46 PM EST up reply actions
I could see him going to the Ravens, but right now I think the Eagles need help at Linebacker, and bad
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:49 PM EST up reply actions
Burflict is OVERRATED, never been impressed with him
I’ve never liked his game and Mayock of all people thinks the same way.
Not that I would be disappointed with Poe
But is there a specific reason you go with a NT instead of a WR for the Texans?
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
They definitely need both
But this class is fairly deep at WR. Poe is a pretty special type of giant human and ol Wade probably has a nice chub goin just thinking about him in the lineup.
I totally agree with trill, Dontari Poe is a beast, he is the best NT in the draft. He will blow people’s minds at the combine, remember what I am telling you
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
Again, I would not be disappointed with Poe one bit
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 9:54 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for that.
Wade probably has a nice chub goin
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
yall crazy
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:37 PM EST up reply actions
pre-combine mocks are tough
But I can’t see Osweiler going before Tannehill and Weeden. You don’t think Buffalo would like to shore up the tackle position with Reiff, or their pass rush with Upshaw? Good call on Kendall Wright though, I don’t think he’ll make it past the 15th pick.
If the Eagles finally do buckle down and draft an LB in the first round, Kuechly seems more their type.i
Eh, I still think if Jeffery is there when the Giants pick, we'll snag him.
Too much talent. Brown is the most likely of LB’s to go to us though, even if I don’t like his lack of wrapping up.
Jeffery is over rated badly, he takes off way too many plays, in my opinion. I have watched tons of film on him and I am not impressed.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions
Plus, he ran a 6.14 40 and weighed in at 335.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
I wish, that would be amazing at WR
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:50 PM EST up reply actions
If Jeffrey runs a 4.65 or lower, the Giants won't be turned away.
"We will not be denied." - Antrel Rolle
by BigBlueIntervention on Feb 15, 2012 10:53 PM EST up reply actions
He will run fast enough for the Chargers to have to trade up to get him
He isnt slow, and at the combine will make Floyd look like a mid round pick in comparison
Winning
If Brown runs a 4.4, I'll take him
My QB has 2 rings. Well, 3 if you want to get technical.
2012 NYG mock - 1: Dwayne Allen TE, 2: Brandon Boykin CB/RS, 3: A.J. Jenkins WR, 4: Vick Ballard RB, 5: Neiko Thorpe S, 6: Rishard Matthews WR/RS, 6: Blake DeChristopher G/T, 7: BPA
Also, Tannehill to Cleveland......really???
That would be a massively wasted pick because Tannehill has a higher bust factor than Colt McCoy. If they had any sense, they’d take Alshon Jeffery there & give McCoy some better weapons, then start getting him some linemen to protect him better
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
you would want Alshton Jeffery who showed up at his workout over weight and ran a 4.8 forty per several sources? That would be a huge risk if you ask me
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
Yet other sources say those reports were completely false
Read this for reference
http://www.catscratchreader.com/2012/2/12/2793523/nfl-draft-alshon-jefferys-combine-training
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 10:26 PM EST up reply actions
Also there's this
Heath Kline on 107.5 The Game stated that the author of that tweet has backtracked on all "facts" including where he was supposedly timed and when he was timed. The author is FOS, and has a background in music, not football (unless fantasy football counts).
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions
Well I read a tweet today from Evan Silva, who said will Jeffrey show up in shape as a wide receiver or out of shape like a TE or a potential person not on a roster
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions
Doesn't detract him from the Texans
We could still use him at TE if that’s the case
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
haha, that is great, I would much rather have him at a TE then a WR. He seems to me like he is MIKE WILLIAMS 2.0
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
He's already risky. Drafting a guy expecting him to play out of position multiplies the risk.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
by FreedomRide on Feb 16, 2012 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
Well, asking James Casey, Glover Quin, & Mario Williams to play out of position was a risk, wasn't it?
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 16, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
None were drafted with that intention, I believe.
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
How's the bust factor calculated?
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 10:42 PM EST up reply actions
The ratio of positive over negative media reviews of said player over a full year, multiplied by 100,
multiplied by their round in the draft, and divided by their overall draft-selection
It is what it is
by Middlesex on Feb 15, 2012 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Thanks!
Now if we could just quantify when someone officially becomes a “beast” all our questions would be answered.
There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 16, 2012 9:49 AM EST up reply actions
that's easy, COIN FLIP, HAHA
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
i love mock drafts that are different. i have no idea if osweiler will go that high, but he will absolutely end up “rising” during this predraft process. even tho hes raw, he has an extremely impressive skill set that will warrant a real high grade from a lot of teams
Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.
I don’t know if he will go that high either, but I could see the Seahawks taking a chance on him, they need a QB, we can’t deny that
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed on Osweiler
He has a very similar build and skill set to John Skelton, only difference is Osweiler went to a bigger school, ASU, than Skelton, Fordham, and is more ‘pro-ready’. I wouldn’t put him in the first yet, but I could potentially see him rising, and a team taking a chance on him a la Ponder and the Vikes last year.
Follow me on Twitter at @AlexDavidson68
Dont see the Skelton comparisons at all
Skelton is like 260… Brock might be 230 in his gear. I guess they are both tall if that’s what you meant.
As far as skill set, Brock doesn’t have the ARM Skelton has. Not even close.
I just thought that was a horrible comparison. Brock is more like Ryan mallet size wise, and Sam bradford skillset wise (tho not nearly as developed)
by cgcardzfan on Feb 17, 2012 10:52 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Pats.
Absolutely horrible. Let’s start with 27th, Chase Minnifield. Great kid and the Pats drafted his former teammate and fellow cornerback Ras-i-Dowling last year at 33rd. He could really add some talent and depth, but I don’t see it happening. Not while DT/34DE Fletcher Cox is on the board, where he would add youth and talent to the Pats DT/34DE corps. Or C Peter Konz who would be a major upgrade and help get Belichick his bang for his buck out of the two rookies RBs he drafted last year in the 2nd(Shane Vereen) and 3rd(Stevan Ridley) rounds. I just don’t see why they go for Minnifield here with those guys up for grabs. The CB corps is if anything too youthful.
Now, as for 31st, I would assume the Pats try to trade it back into next year and get a low-round pick. But besides that, Mark Barron? Are you kidding me? He’s a Safety incapable of man-coverage. Incapable. He’s a SS who’s had the benefit of being surrounded by great talent. He’s a SS who’s got a double-hernia surgery going on, who’s going to miss the Combine, and BTW the Pats already got a SS in Patrick Chung. Barron is incapable of playing FS. Incapable. Even if it was SS the Pats really needed, they wouldn’t go for this guy while some other guys are still on the board. Pats will use capspace to bring in a veteran-FS and maybe draft for depth in the later rounds. I swear to God, I am so sick of seeing people have the Pats take Mark Barron in the 1st.
It is what it is
I agree with you that Chung is there, but the Pat’s secondary is suspect. When I was filling it out, I was going to give the Pats Whitney Mercilius of Illinois but when i thought about it, why wouldn’t you want the best Safety in NCAA football? When you need Safety help?
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:16 PM EST up reply actions
Because the Pats need veteran help back there, not youth.
If anything they’re looking too young in the secondary, and yes in need of some talent. FA makes more sense for addressing S as that class is deeper and the Pats got the money to play wth.
Pats need youth at DT/34DE and WR.
It is what it is
I agree on Barron
Barron is essentially Chung, an injury prone box SS no point in drafting him.
I honestly don’t see the Pats taking a CB in the first round either. Just looking at the DBs they signed to the 80 man roster most of them are larger, way out of the Pats normal mold. I see them being interested in Steed or Trumain Johnson in the 2nd round and loading up on big bodies or trading back with their first round picks
I could see them going for Minnifield based on BPA,
but in the 2nd round. Same with DT/34DE Jared Crick.
It is what it is
As a bills fan, I would hate to see Jared Crick or Vinny Curry go to the Pats. I am just being honest
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
Crick looks like Gronk;
an excellent player deserving of a 1st round pick who took an injury and hasn’t been able to play for awhile, causing his stock to fall.
It is what it is
Crick is a beast, another guy that could be a steal in the later rounds is Matt Reynolds. I think he will be a great player, and he is very smart. Last year people had him in their top 5 for OT’s and he decided to return. Then all the sudden he fell out of conversation this year, but did good. It’s strange
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions
I think Griffin is the most likely and makes the most sense.
Goldston doesn’t look like he’s leaving SF.
It is what it is
Goldson's coverage skills are suspect anyway
Yes he had 6 picks but only had a total of 7 passes defenced (that includes the 6 picks) and according to PFF, quarterbacks have slightly over a 92 rating when throwing into Goldson’s coverage.
I’m not interested
Ask Drew Brees how well he covers
and ask Pierre Thomas how hard he hits when he finally wakes up
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 15, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
That is true, them boys both him and Whitner were unloading on people back there.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions
Goldson not going anywhere anyways
I’m sure they’ll throw the franchise tag on him
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 16, 2012 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
He's a hitter... didn't say he wasn't
but stats don’t lie… they are what they are. He is an average free safety when asked to cover and play the ball
I hope the Pats do sign nelson
he’s horrible.
flayed ones stealth mode
"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."
Quintin Coples
Just so you all know, I don’t think he is a top 10 or even top 32 pick in my mind. I scouted the ACC this year and the guy was horrible. He was flat out horrible. I know a team will reach for him, but he was horrible this season. So i just wanted to make that clear that he is over rated. To me there are many better DE’s in this draft than Coples. He is bust material
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
yes
I agree he is talented and is very capable of doing so, but he doesn’t give a ton of effort. Last year they used him more at DT and he was way better, this year he was non existent.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
I agree but to play devil's advocate
Robert Quinn and Marvin Austin attracted a lot of attention in 2010… Couples didn’t have the luxury of those 2 guys around last year.
Beyond effort, he has pad level problems. Plays too high and gets engulfed, that make him look lazy at times – leverage is everything; he could be playing hard but playing dumb. When his technique is right Couples looks all world
I agree he plays too high, but he is suppose to be an edge presence, and that didn’t happen last season
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
Serious question.
I haven’t seen a single positive report on Burfict all season and people I know who live in Arizona have nothing good to say about the guy. Plus, a report yesterday said he showed up out of shape to the pre-Combine and couldn’t do 15 reps on the bench. So why do you see Coples as a likely bust but see Burfict as the answer to Philadelphia’s LB problem?
by Tracer Bullet on Feb 16, 2012 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
49ers
They have no immediate need for a defensive tackle, I assume you project Still to move out to defensive end in their 3-4 defense. Justin Smith is starting to get up their in age but has yet to slow down and they possibly already have his replacement on the roster in either Demarcus Dobbs or Will Tukuafu. I could see them drafting a defensive tackle that projects to end later in the draft, but not the first round. The immediate needs are wide receiver, guard if Adam Snyder isn’t re-signed, and cornerback if Carlos Rogers leaves in free agency.
I agree
But at this point in the draft, I have them taking the Best Player Available and to me that is Devon Still. He can be used immediately for the Niners.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:37 PM EST up reply actions
Thats funny
I think Still is a top 10 pick, and this guy is complaining they dont need a DL at 30
Winning
I'm not complaining
But I’d rather see us draft someone who could make an immediate impact on the field, not fight for playing time in the rotation and being one of the highest paid special teams players in the league.
How is a guy drafted at 30
going to be the highest ST player in the league. Nevermind the fact dude is 300 pounds. You really must smoking that good stuff
Winning
Zach Brown
Brown could make a lot of sense for the 49ers if they can’t retain Ahmad Brooks. He could play immediately on passing downs and as his pass rushing skills improve, eventually replace Parys Haralson as a starter.
Brown seems to be a much better fit in a 4-3.
I don’t like him for the Niners.
by polodude017 on Feb 16, 2012 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
BPA
I totally agree with this logic, I’ve felt the 49ers will try to either move up a few spots if they see a guy like Konz slip that close to them trying to bolster their O-line in the first round. Or they use a pick on the DL, Devon Still would be a sick pick up in my opinion if that happened and would love to see him in a 49ers jersey. A lot of mocks have the 49ers taking a WR in the first I feel they address that need in free agency, looking at either Robert Meachem, Stevie Johnson and trying to retain Josh Morgan. Great job, Damond.
Kuechly
may be the surest hit in the draft, yet you have him below Burfict & falling to 25?
Try again.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
that's fair
he might be the surest thing in the draft, but just because he has 150+ tackles doesn’t mean he will be great, does it?
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 15, 2012 11:38 PM EST up reply actions
As a Broncos Fan...
I’d take him but i don’t know if I’d take him before Devon Still. Perhaps I could get your rationale. Plus, don’t you think Barron’s injuries knock him well out of the first, best safety (SS, not usually as highly sought after as FS) in this draft notwithstanding?
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
I really don’t think that Mark Barron will fall too far, the reason is, he is very good. If healthy he is the best Safety in the draft, period
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:43 AM EST up reply actions
Best Safety in last year's draft: Rahim Moore.
High 2nd round – with no injuries. Best strong safety: Quinton Carter, 4th round.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
No guarrantee
that ANY draft pick will become great in the NFL.
Based on consistent performance, Kuechly is about as sure a thing as you’ll find in the 2012 draft. He’s fundamentally sound, shows a LOT of football savvy, proven durability, hard worker, good character.
As for Barron – probably best in a weak class. Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Feb 16, 2012 10:00 AM EST up reply actions
Chargers
No real problem with the pick. From my point of view I would have drafted Alshon Jeffery. I think he’s the 2nd best WR though. And there’s others including yourself that think he belongs somewhere after Sanu and Floyd. The Philly guys are going to get all hurt if they havent already cause you took a LB. Reed usually err always goes play maker or linemen in the 1st. And Claiborne is not that good. Thanks for the mock
Winning
I'm good with Martin at 18
provided that there’s no real defensive value there.
I’d be upset with Jefferey taken there. While I’m not completely opposed to WR at 18 IF VJ is gone, Wright would get the nod over Jefferey. Yes, i realize they’re 2 entirely different players & Wright neither matches our usual WR mold nor is a replacement for VJ. He would, however, bring a very dynamic aspect to this offense that has been missing since the departure of Sproles. I could see him used similarly to McCluster & to stretch the field vertically.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Feb 16, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
Vikings
Not sure why everyone had the vikings taking blackmon. He is not an elite wr. If kalil is gone, (which I doubt because the rams have invested high picks at tackle in the last few years, and they’ll probably trade down to a team wanting RGIII) I believe the vikings will go claiborne. They need secondary help badly, and he has the potential to be a shut down corner. Or if the Rams do take kalil, the vikings will trade down to a team like washington for their two 1sts and pick up a LT and a corner/safety. Then 2nd round get Alshon Jeffrey. Just my 0.02
by CerealKilla on Feb 15, 2012 11:57 PM EST via Android app reply actions
I think Osweiler very well could end up being chosen by the Seahawks
Just not that high.
If Upshaw is there at 12 I think he is the guy the Seahawks take. Osweiler in the 2nd.
by The Great Googly on Feb 16, 2012 12:26 AM EST reply actions
Konz to GB is interesting. I think TT is going to re-sign Scott Wells for another couple of years, so I wouldn’t look for a replacement this year. But if he’s too expensive, TT has been known to move on from veteran players after they crack 30, so it’s certainly possible. As for OG, we have Josh Sitton on one side who will hopefully return to his form from 2010 and T.J. Lang, while not star, held his own pretty well.
I think I’m going to be disappointed if this first pick isn’t on the defensive side.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
While Jenkins is practically our guy at this point
I dunno about us taking Miller with Glenn and Konz still on the board.
"It’s time people started realizing just how good a player Carlos Dunlap already is, and that starts with the Bengals. They gave him a season-high 58 snaps and what was the result? Carnage on the right side of the Seattle line." -Pro Football Focus
What no one gave the Rams 10 picks to move up and grab RGIII!!!!!!
This is udderly preposteriorous
Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf
If RG3 is there when Cleveland drafts at #4
Why would they pass up on him for Trent Richardson? The drop off between Richardson and another RB is slight compared to the drop off from RG3 to Tannehill is substantial. The Browns haven’t had a franchise QB since Bernie Kosar. They will not pass on RG3, just to come back later in the first round and reach on a QB who played WR up until mid season in 2010.
"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."
Ya, I don't see it
I could see them taking Richardson early if RG3 is gone. Maybe. If he’s there? He’s the pick.
Without a trade partner this looks good for us
Kalils the target for us anyway. RGIII has enough value to make this not a slam dunk. I still think a team could take him and hold him for ransom. Especially a team like the Rams who could make anyone of 3-4 different guys our 1st pick and still come out alright.
Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf
Also
The Eagles have never taken a linebacker, safety, or runnimg back in the first round since Andy Reid became the head coach. I don’t see that trend breaking anytime soon.
I see the Eagles taking a DT, WR, or OL prospect with their first round pick.
"The tone is business," Garrett said. "Let's get to work. The Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands on Sunday at 4:15. They're an awfully good football team. We have to get ready for them."
Bullish on QBs?
I’ve been waning on that point in my personal mocks (which occur exclusively in my head). Bold, sir. Bold.
Please check out the charity that I run, Fort Worth Music Outreach@ www.fortworthmusicoutreach.org
Everybody makes mocks in their heads
That is what makes it fun, when you put it on paper, it is harder though. You need to sit and do it alone. I think the QB’s are a huge drop off after RG3, HUGE but teams need them bad.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:41 AM EST up reply actions
Would like it if you would include your thought process in how you make the picks
It really adds to Mocks. When I just see names and spots it just feels like someone threw names that sounded good down. Not that I think that’s what you did or anything it’s just I feel that Mocks are much more enjoyable when that person’s rationale for picking said player is. well at least for the 1st rounders. It’s a great post otherwise, don’t like the way your draft fell for the Giants but ehh unless Brockers falls to em (damn near impossible) I probably wouldn’t be happy. Mock drafts and prospect profiles are the best parts of the offseason bar none for me.
Thanks for the input Jlim
The reason I didn’t put my explanations is because it is my first mock draft. If you want an explanation on your team though, let me know, I will give you my opinion on what will happen.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:36 AM EST up reply actions
Packers?
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Nah its not really anything I want an explanation on or anything like that
It’s just interesting for me to find out what people like about certain prospects or why they think x player is a good fit. It really helps me out with prospects cause I only watch a few games of College ball.
Sees Richardson at #4, dismisses entire post as worthless.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Feb 16, 2012 5:22 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Thanks
But I think you will change your mind after the Combine, Trent Richardson will be a beast. He is strong as an ox, and you need a good runningback that is healthy in your division. That is why Peyton Hillis did so well, because them defenses are big. Richardson gives you a franchise runningback and to be honest, I would have gave the browns a WR in the later picks, but there are not that many good WR’s in the first round. Tannehill will be there, he could be a huge riser.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:38 AM EST up reply actions
RBs aren’t taken that high, especially by Tom Heckert. Any mock with Richardson to the Browns (or anywhere in the top 5) shows the poster doesn’t understand the modern NFL at all.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Feb 16, 2012 8:55 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
That's a little over the top...especially for a mockdraft. I think you take these a little too serious.
by tiderfootball09 on Feb 16, 2012 10:36 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Kila's slash for Apr 20 to May 4, 2011, right before he was sent down: .276 / .344 / .448
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Feb 16, 2012 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
Attention Mock Drafters
Please stop mocking Richardson to Cleveland at #4.
Also if Griffin falls as far as #4, (I doubt he will), no way the Browns pass on him. If the draft goes as you want it to for the Browns, I will bleed to death from my eye sockets.
I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.
I don’t see RG3 as a QB for the Browns. That is not Holmgrems style. He has always had a pocket passer. I don’t see it, besides Seneca Wallace, but I don’t him drafting a QB when he has tons of more pressing needs. The Browns could have been good this year, if Peyton Hillis didn’t act like a girl.
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:39 AM EST up reply actions
He has always had a pocket passer
Which is exactly what RG3 is. Just because he can run doesn’t mean he is a run-first QB.
"If you havin' dragon problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 arrows but my knee took one."
by Riddlah. on Feb 16, 2012 8:54 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree he could be a pocket passer, but I am not sure he is a good fit for Holmgrem. I think they will go after Matt Flynn hard though
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 9:03 AM EST up reply actions
I've seen this line a bunch from folks who want Griffin.
And I have to disagree. While he might not look to run first, he does run an awful lot. I’m not sure if he’s a fit for Holmgren or not, but this BS about him being a pocket passer is a little overblown. The fact is, there’s situations where most QB’s will simply tuck the ball and take a sack. In a lot of those situations Griffin will try to extend the play and make something happen. Now that can be good (as in a big play) or bad (as in a bigger loss on the sack of a turnover). I can certainly see some teams not going for that.
by polodude017 on Feb 16, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
but this BS about him being a pocket passer is a little overblown
No, it’s not. He is a pocket passer through and through, he just happens to run more than most QBs (because of his good speed), which isn’t a bad thing. He can throw like Luck and run like a RB when he has to. It’s almost as if people (see: you) try to hold his ability to run against him, like it’s a bad thing.
"If you havin' dragon problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 arrows but my knee took one."
are saying this with a straight face?
When RG3 ran the ball at Baylor it was mostly on designed running plays.
Most of the time he’s moving around INSIDE the pocket and throwing the ball.
Tag Team name for Sean Lee and Bruce Carter is RUSH HOUR
by Rohpuri on Feb 17, 2012 4:22 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
With all that said, I don't see Griffin falling to the Skins.
Just too many teams need QBs and I think at least one team is going to make the mistake of thinking he’s the next Cam Newton.
by polodude017 on Feb 16, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
This
Thank you
"You know the new iPhone? It’s faster, more powerful and smarter. It’s revolutionary. Why can’t the quarterback be like that? Why can’t you be a big, tall, fast, quick, strong, smart, mobile quarterback who’s unstoppable?"
-Cam Newton
by carolinapillpusher on Feb 16, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions
There is no greater need in sports than a Franchise QB. We don’t have one. That need trumps all our other needs combined. (We would not have been good this year even if Hillis had repeated his ’10 year.)
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Feb 16, 2012 8:58 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Franchise QB can mask deficiencies elsewhere
See Peyton Manning from 1998-2010
Tag Team name for Sean Lee and Bruce Carter is RUSH HOUR
by Rohpuri on Feb 17, 2012 4:23 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
thanks
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:39 AM EST up reply actions
thanks, I like him more and more every week as well
Follow on twitter @drocksthaparty
by Damond Talbot on Feb 16, 2012 8:40 AM EST up reply actions
Browns...
Will snap up RG3 regardless of what happens with Peyton Hillis. At 1-22, the Browns could go after Kendall Wright.
No RG3 at 1-4? This definitely brings Richardson, Blackmon and Claiborne into play. I’m not Blackmon’s biggest fan, but TR and Claiborne would be the best alternatives at 1-4.
Tannehill at 1-22 ain’t gonna happen. The Browns can wait for Nick Foles, or another project/depth QB later.
Lions
Of the prospects getting draft after Cordy Glenn at # 23, I like Peter Konz, Zach Brown, Mark Barron, Mike Adams, and Chase Minnifield (in roughly that order) more than Glenn.
Our biggest OL needs are Left Tackle or Center (Backus and Raiola are by far the oldest OL), and we’re relatively stable at Right Tackle and the two Guard spots, so I’m not sure where Glenn fits in.
Hey that's a timeout, I can play right? yeah, get me--get the F-- Help me up...I can throw the ball if you need me to throw the ball...
Lions pick
I can’t see the Lions passing on Mike Adams OLT if he is there to be picked @ #23. They will have a great replacement for Backus for many years. Now if they can get lucky and also get Mike Brewster C in the 3rd rd to go with Adams (team mates at Ohio St.) they would instantly have a very solid OL. They’d need to re-sign Tulloch at ILB or the Lions will be needing a ILB in this draft.
Not too bad of a mock for the broncos.
I will say, there was a report saying that the broncos are confident with Irving starting next year. However it does match their philosphy of BPA because it would be with that pick. So I could see it happening.
Btw, some people posting on here need to take a step back and relax. Just because someone mock drafts your team a player you don’t want, doesn’t mean it’s the end of the word. Notice the word “mock” " before it says draft? Also for the most part, most of these picks line up with what guys at NFL.com are saying and even ESPN. I realize we all have a fantasy mock draft already made in each others minds, but people should be open to other possiabilites and not be so narrow minded. Lastly making strong statements about someone’s knowledge because of a mock draft is childish at best.
by tiderfootball09 on Feb 16, 2012 10:51 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I'd echo your second paragraph.
It’s easy for us to come on here and bash our favorite team’s pick. We’ve probably all watched every game our team played in the previous season and know the roster 1-53. Now imagine trying to do that for all 32 teams. I’ve done mock drafts and it takes a ton of research and knowledge. Provide feedback, but be constructive.
by polodude017 on Feb 16, 2012 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure it shakes out this way.
But this is a dream scenario for KC in my opinion. To have the choice between Reiff, Martin and DeCastro would be ideal. I would go with Reiff also, as you have. He’s got the versatility to play both RT and LT and I like that he’s a little less of a finesse guy than Martin. I like DeCastro, but I think a guard will be easier to find than a tackle.
No Way
RGIII drops to number 6, the skins will have to trade up to Rams to get him away from the Browns.
Decent Giants selection.
JR has shown that he’s not afraid of taking a kid who has tremendous potential and athletic ability in the 1st. I just REALLY doubt he goes LB. I know everyone says he goes BPA and to an extent I agree. I think its more BPA/positional value. I dont think he values the LB position in the draft to spend a 1st rounder. Also, we have a 3-4 young lbers on the team that have shown flashes, in particular Jacquain williams is the same type of mold of a Zach Brown (although brown is a much better prospect) If brown is gunna have to sit behind Boley for 1-2 years i think we just stick with Williams.
Looking at Reese’s drafts for his career in the first 2 rounds hes taken:
WR:3
DB:4
LB: 1
DL: 2
For all those drafts, Giant fans have been screaming for him to take a LB. He’s only taken one (2nd round), Clint sintim, A pass rushing specialist DE/LB tweener. I like brown, just dont see him being the pick.
Steelers
I’ll take Adams even though he looks and sounds like a Starks clone.
I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
"It would be tough for me to care less about their opinion, to be honest with you." Mike Tomlin
I cannot stress the fact that the Jets won't go after Peyton enough.
Just because the front office is making a good move by stating “they will look at everything this off season” doesn’t all of the sudden mean they’re going to go hard for Manning. That would be a terrible move, I would hate it, and it’s not going to happen.
if
rg3 fell to the skins at 6, i don’t know what i would do, but that would be awesome!
by skinsfan42 on Feb 16, 2012 5:52 PM EST via Android app reply actions
As much as I disagree with the thinking, I can understand people mocking Richardson to the Browns. What I don’t understand is, why would the Browns pass on a QB at four to take a runningback, and then just end up taking a quarterback later in the first anyway? If you think the Browns are drafting a QB high, then obviously they’d take RG3 and best DE or WR available over Richardson and Tannehill every single time.
I don’t really agree with taking a QB at #22, and since Richardson is pretty much head and shoulders above any other RB in this draft, that’s why they’d be taking him
I’d rather get Flynn through FA for 10mil a season and see how he does, since he’s already familiar with the WC offense and has proven he can play in the NFL
by More passing yards than Dan Fouts on Feb 17, 2012 8:19 AM EST up reply actions
does anyone honestly believe kendal wright is tje sevond best reciever in the draft?? and really vontaze burfict is far from the best lb in the draft him going before upshall or hightower is absurd
by slamajama621 on Feb 16, 2012 9:20 PM EST via Android app reply actions
Brownies
Love that Richardson pick
They have many holes to fill on offense, but I think a QB can be had either later on in the draft, through FA or next season
Definitely need a RT, also, but that can be done in the 2nd or 3rd
by More passing yards than Dan Fouts on Feb 17, 2012 8:16 AM EST reply actions
Redskins
I really do hope the browns decide to take Trent Richardson as a Redskins fan so we can get RG3. I also notice you had them taking tannehill which I never thought of or saw coming. Good choice and Great Draft
by skins721 on Feb 19, 2012 8:25 AM EST via Android app reply actions
If RG3 is there at 4 and the Browns don’t want them, I doubt they’ll just pass without taking myraid calls from teams like the Seahawks, Cardinals and Redskins to try to trade down.
They can probably get Richardson between 5 and 16 somewhere, so I could see them trading down, grabbing another 2nd round pick and still getting their guy.
by More passing yards than Dan Fouts on Feb 20, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions

by 



















