*v0.4* Just another muck.. err Mock!
UPDATED TO v0.4
A lot of Mock Draft being thrown out there. Wanted to place my Mock in the hat and see what you guys think. I know there'll be some disagreement. I just ask you guys to keep an open mind when evaluating this Mock.
No trades and No Peyton Manning. Lets keep it simple.
ROUND 1 MOCK DRAFT
| Pick |
Team |
Players |
Position |
| 1 | Colts | Andrew Luck | QB |
| 2 | Rams | Matt Kalil | OT |
| 3 | Vikings | Riley Reiff |
OT |
| 4 | Browns | Robert Griffin III | QB |
| 5 | Buccs | Morris Claiborne | CB |
| 6 | Redskins | Dre Kirkpatrick |
CB |
| 7 | Jaguars | Quinton Coples | DE |
| 8 | Dolphins | Melvin Ingram | DE |
| 9 | Panthers | Janoris Jenkins | CB |
| 10 | Bills | Courtney Upshaw |
DE/OLB |
| 11 | Chiefs | Jonathan Martin | OT |
| 12 | Seahawks | Ryan Tannehill |
QB |
| 13 | Cardinals | Nick Perry | OLB |
| 14 | Cowboys | David DeCastro |
OG |
| 15 | Eagles | Luke Kuechly | ILB |
| 16 | Jets | Justin Blackmon |
WR |
| 17 | Bengals | Trent Richardson | RB |
| 18 | Chargers | Mike Adams |
OT |
| 19 | Bears | Cordy Glenn |
OG |
| 20 | Titans | Peter Konz |
C |
| 21 | Bengals | Mark Barron |
S |
| 22 | Browns | Kendall Wright |
WR |
| 23 | Lions | Dont'a Hightower | ILB |
| 24 | Steelers | Andrew Datko |
OT |
| 25 | Broncos | Michael Brockers |
DT |
| 26 | Texans | Michael Floyd |
WR |
| 27 | Patriots | Zach Brown | OLB |
| 28 | Packers | Dontarie Poe |
NT |
| 29 | Ravens | Stephon Gilmore |
CB |
| 30 | 49ers | Mohamed Sanu |
WR |
| 31 | Patriots | George Iloka |
FS |
| 32 | Giants | Lamar Miller |
RB |
| Pick | Team | Player | Position |
UPDATED TO v0.4
If it's deemed spam, it gets deleted.
88 comments
|
Add comment
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Redskins will not reach on Tannehill
He will be there in the second round. As for my chiefs. If you’re not doing trades then I guess DeCastro is good. I’m not sold on a guard at 11 but if he’s as good as they say and we can’t trade out of it, so be it
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
Locker, Gabbert and Ponder....
are proof that the QB position is taken very seriously and is a position that can and will be overdrafted. More proof is the play around the Redskins did with their QB. They need this pick with no trade up. Tannehill is better then both QBs on the Skins and will turn out to be a top QB in the NFL. He already has all the mechanics needed.
Well the Skins passed on both Gabbert and Ponder in last years draft so I don't think they'll reach
for a QB this year if he doesn’t merit the 6th overall pick. I could see them trading down and taking Tannehill later in the first but not at 6.
Tannehill is a better prospect then both of these guys.
Plus those two QBs were definitely not worth those high picks, but the teams were in need. Just like Washington is in need. How many seasons you guys want to go through with this sillyness? If anybody knows the need of a QB, its Mike Shanahan.
Last year teams had Free Agency after the draft
no one was sure they’d get the FA QB they were after so they had to reach for the best QB prospect available in the draft to ensure they had a QB
KC Draft prediction: No OT taken in first round
by trentchiefsfan on Feb 6, 2012 8:01 AM EST up reply actions
I'd take Minnifield before Boykin for Denver.
Boykin’s way too high here. Wouldn’t mind getting him in the 2nd.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
i think your right
i was actually stump at the Denver pick. A lot of people have Denver taking a TE. I know that Fox never drafted a DT in the 1st and prefers DBs. So to me it was overdraft a CB, overdraft a SS or the uneeded TE, which isnt a dire need. The problem is that Boykin and Minnifield are both projected as 2nd rounders, with Boykin above him because of his strong performance at the Senior Bowl. This could change as the draft gets closer, though.
Broncos will go BPA...
Fox has input but Elway has final say on draft picks. We do not need a SS but if you give up on Rahim Moore (I don;t yet) FS may be a need. Dwayne Allen, if he’s there would be a hell of an upgrade to the gaggle of late-rounders/journeymen TEs we’re fielding now. He would be a great weapon for a developing QB. Some other Broncos fans will disagree with me about that but they are not thinking BPA. DTs who can plug up the middle are still the biggest need for the Broncos. We’ll have to agree to disagree about Minnifield v. Boykin until the combine but I still see Minnifield as a late 1st and Boykin as a mid 2nd.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
I disagree with Allen as I dont think he warrants a 1st round pick. I am not convinced of his blocking skills and therefore would not be an every down contributor which I believe a 1st round pick should be.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
Everything I've read says he's a pretty good blocker...
The YouTubes seem to indicate this as well. He’s the complete package whereas Fleener is a good receiver but not a blocker and Orson Charles is the opposite.
I’m continuing to hope either Brockers or Still is there at 25 and this is a no-brainer but I’d be fine with Allen as opposed to the fith or sixth best DL or the 3rd or 4th best CB in the draft.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
i think he is very good receiver however i wasnt convinced when I saw him block and not read anything to convince me otherwise yet.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
Funny...
I can’t find a single scouting report questioning his blocking. And highlights I’ve seen show him blocking pretty well. Agreed, though, he’s got size, speed, and hands to rip it up in the NFL.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
I have had a quick relook at National Football Post and CBS they seem a bit more complimentary when I read them.
I may well have seen the bits that fitted my view such as
“High cut frame and limited power in hands prevent a top blocking grade. Will never be a dominant blocker because of frame.” from CBS
“doesn’t do a great job keeping his base down into contact, which allows defenders to get under him initially in the run game in-line…..gets upright and will get caught overextending at the point, allows himself to easily be rag dolled/ slipped through contact.” National Football Post
and passed over the better bits.
Whilst I am maybe open little bit more to the idea that he is a better blocker they do keep me thinking that he is not quite a 1st round guy for me yet.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
I don't think I've read National Football Post but...
Fair play.
I think that, depending upon whose board you look at, players ranked from say, 20 down to oh, 40 are really a matter of opinion and open to debate. There are a couple guys like Allen and Peter Konz who are the #1 guys at their position in this draft. I’d be more inclined to pick them than settling for the 4th, 5th, or 6th best player at another position of higher need.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
I agree that there are not a lot of guys out there who you could discuss the merits of where exactly they go in that 20-40 range. I think this is a draft with 15-20 definite 1st rounders and the it all depends on your team from there.
From a Denver perspective I would be looking at the board at 25 and seeing how many of those guys left will become an every down starter immediately. If there isnt a guy there hope another team does see a guy who they think can and then try and draft down and get at least another pick.
If there is a guy at 25 who happens to be the 4th best CB but they think he can contribute immediately great as he has just improved the team who takes the field on a Sunday.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
I think we both agree and disagree here at the same time...
Because, yes if this is a draft with 4 no-brainer, starter-from-day-one, CBs, taking one is worthwhile at pick #25. However, that corner is going to have to go out and beat Champ Bailey, Andre Goodman, Cassius Vaughn et al. and maybe he can. Or, say, because Bailey and Goodman are getting on a bit, you see this guy is a guaranteed replacement for one of them and better than any other pick (say it’s Kirkpatrick, falling inexplicably) then yes, take him but Dwayne Allen would easily be able to beat out our gaggle of journeymen/later-round projects at TE and be a true weapon in the Shannon Sharpe mold from the outset. I think that’s where we don’t agree.
I’m open to the idea of Allen being BPA if Still and Brockers are gone and I wouldn’t reach for Cox, Thompson, or Worthy. I also think Claborne and Kirkpatrick are guarantees while Jenkins, Dennard, Gilmore, are question marks and likely not worth it. I would also be open to Minnifield in the scenario proposed by this mock.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
I like Fletcher Cox but while he's a first round caliber player
so is Chase Minnifield and he plays a higher value position. Plus its Brockers or no DT in the first round for the G’s
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
What about resigning Terrell Thomas? What about Prince?
You guys have CBs. Fletcher is no little guy, plus he’s faster then Brockers. Not as good, but none of the top DLinemen are falling this far down. I think Fletcher is sleeper that will produce for the Gmen.
We are loaded at DT and have little cap room
Remember that we drafted Marvin Austin last year, that is our Fletcher Cox. Bernard had his best year as a Giant. Cox would be the 5th DT. Zero playing time. It only works if you are cutting Canty for cap space, and Canty is not the best choice for that due to his contract structure.
Ross is a UFA and is gone if he gets starting-type money. Thomas is coming off his 2nd surgery on the same ACL, he will probably resign cheap but cannot necessarily be counted on. And if he does recover fully, he will probably be gone in free agency in 2013. So Webster and Prince start, and we need a nickel.
Manningham is also likely gone, so I could see Dwight Jones or Sanu there. I’m also willing to consider McNutt that high.
If Kuechly gets bumped past Baltimore, I’d take him in a second.
2012 NYG mock - 1: Janoris Jenkins CB, 2: Kevin Zeitler G, 3: A.J. Jenkins, WR, 4: Neiko Thorpe S, 5: Vick Ballard RB, 6: Rishard Matthews WR, 6: some random LB, 7: BPA
I see Ravens don't want Kuechly, and Jeffrey is still there
One of those two would be great.
2012 NYG mock - 1: Janoris Jenkins CB, 2: Kevin Zeitler G, 3: A.J. Jenkins, WR, 4: Neiko Thorpe S, 5: Vick Ballard RB, 6: Rishard Matthews WR, 6: some random LB, 7: BPA
I didn't notice Jeffery wasn't taken
Easy pick then. Jeffery thrown in with our WR’s would be too good to be true.
Thomas, Ross,
doesn’t matter. Can never have too many corners, right after pass rushers. As for DT they basically get an extra draft pick in Marvin Austin. Cox can be faster then Brockers, but he’s not 6"6 312 and the best DL on one of the best defenses in college football.
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
i must say i like the format and look
Justin Blackmon is fine for the Jaguars
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Problem with our Wide recievers is that they're never wide open and they have trouble receiving the ball...
by TheTealDeal on Feb 5, 2012 9:22 AM EST via mobile reply actions
as i said on a previous mock
Blackmon is not worth the #7 pick plain and simple. Coples is the pick thank you very much!!
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
he is a reach though
his size is nice but not elite size. his speed is good but not elite. Unless he is the next Megatron or Fitzgerald or Andre Johnson, he is not worthy of a top 10 pick as a WR
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
6'1" 215lbs
You make it sound like he’s short. Most CBs are 2-3 inches shorter then him. He’s likely to run a 4.45 at the combine. It isnt elite, but neither was Jerry Rice. As long as he gets seperation with his route running, which he occassionally does, then he’ll do good. Plus he has great hands. Who else does your QB has to throw to?
I agree with Jagsrok
You can’t give Blackmon a 7th overall pick grade simply because Jerry Rice did well. Who doesn’t get separation occasionally? Prospects are all just that, prospects until they take the field. Blackmon has outstanding talent, but in the absence of the premium (6’5") height and 4.3 speed he’s a reach if taken any higher than 12-15. If a team needs O-line or D-line help more they have to pass on him unless there just isn’t any available good linemen left, which is not the case.
Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf
Blackmon got a 7th overall pick because of his skill and team need.
I only mention Rice because speed is not the dominating factor of a WRs success. No WR in this draft is 6’5" with a 4.3 speed. Not 6’4", not 6’3", not 6’2", not 6’1" and not 6’. There is only 4 WRs with a 4.3 speed within the first 3 rounds and their 5’9" – 5’11". You guys have no WR and without it, your QB can have all the time in the world and the DLine will get to him due to this fact. Ask Cutler. His #1 Receiver is his HB and he has 2 WR with 4.3 speed.
I guess we disagree on even more than I thought
Here’s a five-point summary of the Shiny Hood Ornament Man Law:
ONE – Wide receivers, for all their eye-catching flash and dash, are little more than shiny ornaments on the hood of an NFL offense. Oh, sure, they’re nice to have and they look all bright and sexy. But they don’t necessarily make the engine run any better – and they rarely if ever make your team any better.
TWO – You should add a flashy wide receiver only when all the other pieces of a great team are in place: a great driver (the quarterback), some sporty tires that provide plenty of traction (the offensive line and ground game), a powerful motor (the defense) and a great transmission (special teams) that allows you to change gears quickly and effectively.
THREE – Even the greatest receivers of all time can make a big impact only when all those pieces are in place, and even then the impact is largely overstated. Even the great Jerry Rice, for example, touched the ball just four to five times per game. So the impact of even the greatest at the position is minimal compared with the impact of a certain position that touches the ball on every offensive snap. And remember, Rice did not make the 49ers a great team. He was drafted by the 18-1 defending Super Bowl champ 49ers in 1985.
FOUR – Quarterbacks make wide receivers; wide receivers do not make quarterbacks. You can have a receiving corps of Rice, Don Hutson, Randy Moss, Homer Jones and the Catawba Claw … they won’t make many game-changing plays if the quarterback can’t get them the ball.
FIVE – Drafting wide receivers in the first round is almost always a bad decision; mortgaging your future with five draft picks to make it happen should get any personnel manager or GM fired immediately.
Good teams start building on the lines and work their way out. Teams who draft weapons without fixing their lines fail pretty regularly. Some one posted a link to this article on an earlier post so I can’t take any credit for originality, but I have subscribed to this philosophy for years and haven’t seen any evidence to the contrary yet.
Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf
by dbcouver on Feb 5, 2012 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Did I mention I'm happy with the Rams pick
I don’t want you to think that I didn’t agree with it. Actually, barring a trade it’s what I’d do.
Wolf. Wolfgang Wolf
I do think the best option is trade down
However, in this “no-trade situation”, you have to protect Bradford. This pick is way too high for WR. Plus the 2nd round will have many to choose from.
we agree on something
Teams should build from the inside-out, but not all teams follow this philosophy. It can go either way.
The Browns thought it was a good idea to not draft Julio Jones last year,
and look how it turned out. After another season, its still hard for them to evaluate whether or not Colt Mcoy is worth keeping as a starter because he “did not have any weapons”. I would say a top 3 pick is too high for a reciever, but #7 overall is fine for the best WR in the draft at a position of dire need.
The Jags WRs would not see the field on most NFL teams, and that is bascially setting Gabbert up for failure. MJD can not be the sole source of the team’s offense every year. RBs tend to have a small window for their peak.
Point number 3 is silly. If Jerry Rice catches 4-5 balls a game for 2 touchdowns, that is a huge impact on the game. Point number 5 is strange as well. Many recievers drafted in the first round have had great careers, so I don’t get how that is “almost always a bad decison”.
"You know the new iPhone? It’s faster, more powerful and smarter. It’s revolutionary. Why can’t the quarterback be like that? Why can’t you be a big, tall, fast, quick, strong, smart, mobile quarterback who’s unstoppable?"
-Cam Newton
by carolinapillpusher on Feb 6, 2012 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
1)Blackmon himself is thinking he runs closer to 4.5
2)If you go WR at 7, he better be taller and faster than 98+% of potential defenders.
3)Blackmon is not all that great. He is very good, but by no means is his talent level anything close to being worthy of a top 10 pick
4)It is not about who is there for Gabbert to throw to. The draft is about taking the best players at your pick. Need based drafting has failed this team in the past and the current GM does not employ that strategy. You get the best guy on your board, and I just do not see Blackmon as being close to BAP at 7
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
no i disagree
Blackmon is great at route running, catching the ball, and getting separation. Blackmon is completely an option due to our extreme need for WRs and his skillset. Feel free to disagree but your “opinion” isn’t the end all, say all, thank you very much.
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Problem with our Wide recievers is that they're never wide open and they have trouble receiving the ball...
by TheTealDeal on Feb 5, 2012 4:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I know he's a playmaker.
Much needed in Jacksonville.
not denying that
but is it worth reaching for a playmaker, especially when a top FA WR like Bowe or Colston more than likely ends up in Jacksonville.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
How much Cap Space does Jacksonville have??? There are other WR starved teams that have a fairly huge cap space.
A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
If I am not mistaken
they have most or second most cap space of any team.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
Until a WR has signed with us
Wrs can still be mocked to us
"HULU: An evil plot to destroy the world. Enjoy"
The Problem with our Wide recievers is that they're never wide open and they have trouble receiving the ball...
by TheTealDeal on Feb 6, 2012 3:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
even if a WR signs
mock away the WRs to the jags, but not Blackmon in the first since he is awful value there.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
If Richardson fell to 17 and Kirkpatrick fell to 21, that would be awesome.
Cincy Jungle: Where the Rocky Mountains are in the Pacific Ocean
Dude
It could not have played out any better for the Bengals. Great job!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bengals Picks = Home Run
I couldn’t be happier if it fell this way.
by Animal_Like_Football on Feb 5, 2012 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
Ravens
not a fan of Kuechly in a 3-4. I don’t think he has the size or athleticism to make up for it to be successful in a 3-4. Rather have Burfict or Jeffery.
On Ed Reed:
"I’ve told him to his face many times, ‘You’re the greatest safety ever to play the game,’"
"We all learn from each other, but we all learn most from him."
- Troy Polamalu
Absolutely
What was I thinking. This is the Ravens for crying out loud.
Konz is a lot better pick than Kuechly for us, however I do hesitate to use a first rounder on a C and especially one who has missed at least 2 games every year. If Grubbs leaves this pick will be more realistic since he could play G as well, but still have my reserves on it.
On Ed Reed:
"I’ve told him to his face many times, ‘You’re the greatest safety ever to play the game,’"
"We all learn from each other, but we all learn most from him."
- Troy Polamalu
With Gurode not playing to well at G and your C being an UFA, I think this would be the best route for Flacco and Rice.
Yeah it certainly is a possibility. Only thing that concerns me is the injuries. Ozzie is dedicated to helping the line this off-season though, so it definitely is a possibility. He is a good evaluator of line play and I just don’t know if he will choose to go this early or wait. Grubbs is the only interior lineman we have ever ever selected in the first and only 1 of 2 we have ever selected in the first two rounds.That’s my reasoning as why I think he could opt to pass on Konz, but like I said it still is definitely a possibility. He also could possibly trade down if this scenario played out, with Konz, Jeffery and Burfict all still available. Ozzie rarely stands still at the draft position so we will probably trade up if there’s someone he really likes or trade down.
On Ed Reed:
"I’ve told him to his face many times, ‘You’re the greatest safety ever to play the game,’"
"We all learn from each other, but we all learn most from him."
- Troy Polamalu
I actually would welcome Kuechly here. Many thought the same things about Laurinitis and Sean Lee when they got drafted, and those are two of the best ILB in the game right now.
Trust me, we could find a way to make a guy who had nearly 400 tackles in 2 seasons work in our defense.
"Picture Me Rollin"
Cowboys
I don’t think Cowboys take Jenkins before Kirkpatrick. Jenkins has more concerns than Kirkpatrick (drugs, height, tackling). Kirkpatrick would be the safer prospect that we could use against Nicks, Fitz, and other taller WRs.
"People don't really understand the light that I bring and just kind of shine on my teammates."
-Actual DeSean Jackson quote
by CaliCowboysFan92 on Feb 5, 2012 12:00 PM EST reply actions
True
Jenkins is a better cover CB. It could really go either way. I think Jenkins will rise above Dre due to his play at the Senior Bowl and his combine #s.
Yeah I have to see how Dre does at the combine before I pick a side
but I do believe that Jenkins has more cover talent.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
agreed
"People don't really understand the light that I bring and just kind of shine on my teammates."
-Actual DeSean Jackson quote
by CaliCowboysFan92 on Feb 5, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions
Texans
Even if Mario leaves OLB wouldn’t be that big of a need. WR is the only major hole we have.
and the clouds opened up and God said "I Hate you Texans Fans."
Our Andre, who art from Heaven, hallowed by thy name.
Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Canton.
Awful eagles pick
We have two quality tackles in Peters and Heremens and we need a LB desperately I would much rather Kuechley
I though ILB was a reach at this spot
But thank you for pointing this out. I was under the impression they needed a RT.
Titans DONT NEED A DT IN THE 1ST ROUND!
Team needs are DE, WR, OG, C, WOLB, S then if Finny leaves in FA a mid to late round CB.
So change the Titans pick to Whitney Mercilus
MCM's Favorite Public Servant
by Titans_Firefighter on Feb 5, 2012 1:40 PM EST reply actions
Bad Jets pick.
There is really no need for a DT, he couldn’t play NT and there is no need for depth there.
It was a DT originally
I updated it to an OT since the Jets need a RT.
Panthers
few problems with this. 1- Hurney is a very strong believer in BPA and hiting on the 2st round, Brockers is not close to BPA and is a huge risk. 2- Rivera has clearly expressed that he is ok with our DTs and said it wont be a point of focus in the draft.
I wanna be the very best, like no one ever was
Didnt know that
At the sametime the BPA are DE and 34 OLB, which you guys dont need.
well we are in a decent spot to trade down
but in this situation i think we would go with Kirkpatrick as long as he has a decent combine.
I wanna be the very best, like no one ever was
As much as I like Poe to the Texans
I just can’t see them passing on Mohammed Sanu
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
Also, I can't see the Steelers passing on Poe either
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
by The Night Owl on Feb 5, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
Great corners are very hard to find, and the pass is "in" right now.
I don’t see Kirpatrick dropping all the way to 21 over one weed charge.
"You know the new iPhone? It’s faster, more powerful and smarter. It’s revolutionary. Why can’t the quarterback be like that? Why can’t you be a big, tall, fast, quick, strong, smart, mobile quarterback who’s unstoppable?"
-Cam Newton
by carolinapillpusher on Feb 6, 2012 2:28 PM EST reply actions
UPDATE!
After reading everyone’s comments and more scouting reports, I’ve change many picks around. Take a look and please have an open mind.
Jags
MUCH better.
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
Twitter: @JWGreenbaum
Michael Floyd to the Texans??? Oh hell no......
Absolutely no way the Texans would draft someone with 3 DUIs on his record already. Texans do not draft players with character issues, especially not with high draft picks. Alshon Jeffery is still on the board, & they’d gladly take him over Floyd. Jeffery’s problems are correctable, whereas Floyd would be a disaster in Houston off the field.
Murphy’s 20th Military Law:
If it’s stupid, but it works, it ain’t stupid
"Fuck em all. Go Texans."
Dont'a to the Leos looks acceptable if Tulloch leaves
But that’s only if Tulloch leaves, and there’s no indication one way or another. I’d probably reach down for Zach Brown before grabbing an ILB, at least before free agency is done.
"You've got to respect your opponent, no matter who it is. You respect him best by going out there and beating him up." - Calvin Johnson

by 






















